E. Coli

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Kikuvi, G.M.; Ole-Mapenay, I.M.; Mitema, E.S. and Ombui, J., (2006): Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia Coli isolates from faeces and carcass samples of slanghtered cattle and chicken in Kenya. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 61(314): 82-87. Khohkhoo P.H. and peighambari S.M. (2005): Drug resistance patterns and plasmid profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from cases of avian colibacillosis. Journal of the faculty of veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, 60(2): 97-105. Kondrachi M. (1976): Sensitivity of Escherichia Coli strains isolated from field cases of calf colibacillosis to antibiotics and nitrofuran preparations. I. sensitivity.to antibiotic in vitro. Medycyana Vet., 23: 355-356. Krieg N.R. and Holt J.G. (1984): Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. I. William and Wilkins. Company, Baltimore, London. Kumar A.D., Sarma B.J.R., Rao A.S. and Mishra S.K. (2003): Serogroups of Escherichia Coli isolates from chickens and their antibiogram. Indian journal of poultry science., 38(3): 270-273. Lambie N., Ngeleka M., Brown G. and Ryan J. (2000): Retrospective study on Escherichia coli infection in broilers subjected to postmortem 110 --
examination and antibiotic resistance of isolates in Trinidad. Avian Dis., 44 (1): 155-60. Landman W.J. and Cornelissen R.A. (2006): Escherichia coli salpengitis and peritonitis in layer chickens. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd, 131 (22): 814-22. Larkin C., Poppe C., McNab B., MaEwen B., Mahdi A. and Odumeru J.(2004): Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from hog beef and chicken Carcass samples from Provincially inspected abattoirs in Ontario. J. food Prot., 67(3): 448-455. Lee Y.J., Kim K.S., Kwon Y.K. and Tak R.B. (2003): Biochemical characteristic and antimicrobials susceptibility of Salmonella gallinarum isolated in Korea J. Vet. Sci., 4(2): 161-166. Likov B., Elistina P. and Paranzhilova M. (1984): Dynamics of latent epizootic process as evaluated an incidence of infection index. Vet. Med. Nauki., 21 (7-8): 31-7. Lin, M.Y.; Cheng, M.C.; Huang, K.J. and Tsai, W.C.(1993): Classification, pathogenicity and susceptibility of hemolytic Gram negative bacteria isolated from sick or dead chickens. Avian Dis. 37:6-9 Liu, J.H.; Wei, S.Y.; Ma, J.Y.; Zeng, Z.L.; Lu, D.H.; Yang, G.X. and Chem, Z.L., (2007): Detection and characterization of CTX-M and CMY-2 B-Lactamases among Escherichia coli isolates from farm animals in Guangdong province of China. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 29: 576-581. 111 --
Page 1 and 2:
A STUDY ON THE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS I
Page 3 and 4:
List of contents Page 1-Introductio
Page 5 and 6:
Tables Page Table(1)Biochemical rea
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements First of all thank
Page 9 and 10:
2 Introduction certain serogroups,
Page 11 and 12:
Sodium chloride 5.0 g/l Agar pH 7.3
Page 13 and 14:
Sodium citrate, tribasic 2.0 g/l So
Page 15 and 16:
3.1.4.Solutions and indicators in b
Page 17 and 18:
Polyvalent 4: O6 , O27 , O78 , O148
Page 19 and 20:
serological identification accordin
Page 21 and 22:
6- Urease test The test determine t
Page 23 and 24:
3. The plate was swabbed in differe
Page 25 and 26:
2.REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1. Inciden
Page 27 and 28:
Review of Literature suggested that
Page 29 and 30:
Review of Literature K5 (37.5%), 15
Page 31 and 32:
Review of Literature within Ireland
Page 33 and 34:
Review of Literature salmonella spe
Page 35 and 36:
Review of Literature Sasipreeyajan
Page 37 and 38:
Review of Literature Moreno et al.
Page 39 and 40:
Review of Literature Mohamad (1996)
Page 41 and 42:
Review of Literature pencillin (68.
Page 43 and 44:
Review of Literature El-Ghamdi et a
Page 45 and 46:
Review of Literature serious ever l
Page 47 and 48:
Review of Literature the time from
Page 49 and 50:
Review of Literature isolates from
Page 51 and 52:
4.Results A total of 295 chicken sa
Page 53 and 54:
Table (4): Incidence of chicken Ent
Page 55 and 56:
Abolila 11 10/11(90.9%) 10/10(100%)
Page 57 and 58:
fermentation (Lactose, Maltose, Man
Page 59 and 60:
isolates were salmonella, pseudomon
Page 61 and 62:
Fig.(3)Triple sugar iron agar(TSI),
Page 63 and 64:
Fig.(4).Citrate negative E.coli iso
Page 65 and 66:
Fig.(6)An isolate was sensitive to
Page 67 and 68: Farm Mansoura1 Omda1 Asher3 Asher4
Page 69 and 70: Gentamycin, Colistin, Erythromycin,
Page 71 and 72: Trimethoprim), Colistin, Erythromyc
Page 73 and 74: (Sulpamethox-azole/ Trimethoprim),
Page 75 and 76: Table(10)Sensitivity pattern for is
Page 77 and 78: R = Resistant S = Sensitive CTX30 =
Page 79 and 80: Table(12 )Sensitivity Pattern of is
Page 81 and 82: Doxycyclin, Erythromycin, were effe
Page 83 and 84: Fig.(8) Sensitivity percentages of
Page 85 and 86: Discussion Concerning bacteriologic
Page 87 and 88: al., (1997) reported that 10% of E.
Page 89 and 90: 1/2(50%) Salmonella broiler isolate
Page 91 and 92: 12/14(85.71%) E.coli isolates from
Page 93 and 94: streptomycin, meanwhile higher perc
Page 95 and 96: Two out of eleven(18.18%) E.coli is
Page 97 and 98: and Nguyen (1995) who reported mode
Page 99 and 100: Summary Bacterial diseases have lon
Page 101 and 102: epresented 105/138(76.08%) and 33/1
Page 103 and 104: 100%, 100%, 63.63%, 63.63%, 63.63%,
Page 105: 3-Results of antibiogram on biotype
Page 108 and 109: a pediatric cohort in aperiurbab ar
Page 110 and 111: Bozorgmehri O., Fard M.H. and Gilan
Page 112 and 113: importance in some poultry farms. 7
Page 114 and 115: Fisher M.E., Trampel D. W. and Grif
Page 116 and 117: Hui, A.K. and Das, R., (2000): Prev
Page 120 and 121: Machado J. and Bernardo F. (1990):
Page 122 and 123: Oxoid manual (1998): The oxoid manu
Page 124 and 125: and O 157 Serotypes from piglets an
Page 126 and 127: Van Donkersgoed J., Manninen K., Po
Page 128 and 129: ﻦﻴﺘﺴﻟﻮآ , ﻦﻴﺳﺎ
Page 130: - She received her primary educatio
show all

E. Coli

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?