Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REVIEWS AND COMMENTS BY MURRAY N. ROTHBARD 87<br />
We see <strong>the</strong> interesting and important roles played in maintaining<br />
and fostering <strong>the</strong> liberal tradition by <strong>the</strong> dissenters, by<br />
Yorkshiremen, by <strong>the</strong> Anglo-Irish seeking relaxation of English<br />
bonds, by Cambridge University and by <strong>the</strong> dissenting<br />
Academies of <strong>the</strong> West Country. We see <strong>the</strong> importance, in<br />
<strong>the</strong> early period, of Trenchard and Gordon, authors of <strong>the</strong><br />
Cato letters. 33 And we find such intriguing characters as<br />
<strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century. Cartwright’s influence was<br />
evident in <strong>the</strong> six points of <strong>the</strong> Chartists, a sociopolitical movement<br />
that developed in England between 1838 and 1850 that aimed to<br />
improve <strong>the</strong> terrible conditions of <strong>the</strong> working class and to introduce,<br />
at <strong>the</strong> political level, such fundamental rights as universal suffrage.<br />
John Jebb (1736–1786) was a Unitarian who studied at Trinity<br />
College. He taught ma<strong>the</strong>matics, but various colleges prohibited <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
students from attending his lectures because of his nonconformist<br />
religious ideas. He was in favor of independence for <strong>the</strong> American<br />
colonies and he condemned English policy towards America.<br />
Capel Lofft (1751–1824) joined <strong>the</strong> radical movement for parliamentary<br />
reform in <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century. He<br />
was <strong>the</strong> author of An Argument on <strong>the</strong> Nature of Party and Faction:<br />
In Which Is Considered <strong>the</strong> Duty of a Good and Peaceable Citizen<br />
at <strong>the</strong> Present Crisis (1780).<br />
33 John Trenchard (1662–1723), a political writer and polemicist,<br />
was known for, among o<strong>the</strong>r things, his writings against a standing<br />
army. He was elected to Parliament and in 1719 he began to<br />
work with Thomas Gordon, with whom he published Cato’s Letters<br />
in <strong>the</strong> London Journal from 1719 to 1723. This was a series of articles<br />
criticizing government activities in general. Among his works,<br />
see A Short History of Standing Armies in England (1698).<br />
Thomas Gordon (c. 1692–1750) was a lawyer in Scotland who<br />
later moved to London, where he began his work as a political writer<br />
and polemicist. Among Gordon’s works, see The Conspirators, The<br />
Case of Catiline (1721); A Learned Dissertation Upon Old Women<br />
(1720); Three Political Letters to a Noble Lord, Concerning Liberty<br />
and Constitution (1721).<br />
Trenchard and Gordon helped to disseminate <strong>the</strong> thought of Locke,<br />
applying his ideas to <strong>the</strong> concrete problems of <strong>the</strong> government of <strong>the</strong><br />
day. Their most important writings, in this regard, were Cato’s Letters,<br />
which came out in various editions in <strong>the</strong> American colonies where <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were widely distributed. It seems that <strong>the</strong>y were very important in forging<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical basis for <strong>the</strong> American Revolution. Gordon and<br />
Trenchard gave a particularly radical turn to Locke’s thought. While