Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REVIEWS AND COMMENTS BY MURRAY N. ROTHBARD 55<br />
Well, <strong>the</strong>re you are. The “stronger” has won; <strong>the</strong><br />
“weaker” has lost; but with him was lost <strong>the</strong> faint precious<br />
stirrings of a civilized culture. Where does morality stand on<br />
this issue? Has “good” triumphed? Does might make right?<br />
Does morality mean barbarism? As far I am concerned, <strong>the</strong><br />
answer to <strong>the</strong>se questions is a ringing nay!<br />
The Rugged Individualist who gave three lusty cheers on<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ug victory is thus sadly deficient in moral sense. His <strong>the</strong>ory<br />
of ethics is on <strong>the</strong> level of an intolerant barbarian.<br />
3. The Glorification of Struggle<br />
The Rugged Individualist glorifies struggle and condemns<br />
<strong>the</strong> easy path. Since <strong>the</strong> whole process of civilization has<br />
been <strong>the</strong> cumulative attempt to make it easier to satisfy<br />
man’s desires, <strong>the</strong> Rugged Individualist is of necessity<br />
opposed to civilization. We consider man as progressing<br />
when he invents ever new ways to “reduce costs” which is<br />
simply <strong>the</strong> process of finding easier ways to satisfy man’s<br />
ever-growing desires.<br />
I consider one of <strong>the</strong> glories of economic freedom and individualism<br />
(not rugged, but humane) <strong>the</strong> ever-growing standard<br />
of living, <strong>the</strong> magnificent increase in opportunities for<br />
leisure, and <strong>the</strong> development of life-giving modern medicine.<br />
I consider it a tribute to <strong>the</strong> moral qualities of an individualist<br />
society that private charity and philanthropy helps <strong>the</strong><br />
unfortunate people in our midst. Private philanthropy is <strong>the</strong><br />
direct expression of <strong>the</strong> great Christian principle of <strong>the</strong><br />
bro<strong>the</strong>rhood of man and <strong>the</strong> Golden Rule.<br />
Private philanthropy indeed is <strong>the</strong> only valid expression of<br />
<strong>the</strong>se Christian ethical principles; compulsory charity<br />
through “social legislation” is <strong>the</strong> exact contrary: it is <strong>the</strong><br />
evil imposition of force by one group on ano<strong>the</strong>r. Christ was<br />
a great individualist not because He was rugged, as Dr. Cutten<br />
seems to think, but because He recognized that His great<br />
ethical principles could only be put into effect through <strong>the</strong> voluntary<br />
action of individuals and not by a self-appointed group