04.06.2013 Views

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REVIEWS AND COMMENTS BY MURRAY N. ROTHBARD 55<br />

Well, <strong>the</strong>re you are. The “stronger” has won; <strong>the</strong><br />

“weaker” has lost; but with him was lost <strong>the</strong> faint precious<br />

stirrings of a civilized culture. Where does morality stand on<br />

this issue? Has “good” triumphed? Does might make right?<br />

Does morality mean barbarism? As far I am concerned, <strong>the</strong><br />

answer to <strong>the</strong>se questions is a ringing nay!<br />

The Rugged Individualist who gave three lusty cheers on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ug victory is thus sadly deficient in moral sense. His <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

of ethics is on <strong>the</strong> level of an intolerant barbarian.<br />

3. The Glorification of Struggle<br />

The Rugged Individualist glorifies struggle and condemns<br />

<strong>the</strong> easy path. Since <strong>the</strong> whole process of civilization has<br />

been <strong>the</strong> cumulative attempt to make it easier to satisfy<br />

man’s desires, <strong>the</strong> Rugged Individualist is of necessity<br />

opposed to civilization. We consider man as progressing<br />

when he invents ever new ways to “reduce costs” which is<br />

simply <strong>the</strong> process of finding easier ways to satisfy man’s<br />

ever-growing desires.<br />

I consider one of <strong>the</strong> glories of economic freedom and individualism<br />

(not rugged, but humane) <strong>the</strong> ever-growing standard<br />

of living, <strong>the</strong> magnificent increase in opportunities for<br />

leisure, and <strong>the</strong> development of life-giving modern medicine.<br />

I consider it a tribute to <strong>the</strong> moral qualities of an individualist<br />

society that private charity and philanthropy helps <strong>the</strong><br />

unfortunate people in our midst. Private philanthropy is <strong>the</strong><br />

direct expression of <strong>the</strong> great Christian principle of <strong>the</strong><br />

bro<strong>the</strong>rhood of man and <strong>the</strong> Golden Rule.<br />

Private philanthropy indeed is <strong>the</strong> only valid expression of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se Christian ethical principles; compulsory charity<br />

through “social legislation” is <strong>the</strong> exact contrary: it is <strong>the</strong><br />

evil imposition of force by one group on ano<strong>the</strong>r. Christ was<br />

a great individualist not because He was rugged, as Dr. Cutten<br />

seems to think, but because He recognized that His great<br />

ethical principles could only be put into effect through <strong>the</strong> voluntary<br />

action of individuals and not by a self-appointed group

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!