04.06.2013 Views

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LAW AND NATURE IN THE WORK OF MURRAY N. ROTHBARD 13<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory of subjective rights has its roots in <strong>the</strong> nominalist<br />

philosophy of Ockham, Tierney identifies <strong>the</strong> concept of ius<br />

as a subjective right in <strong>the</strong> writings of <strong>the</strong> twelfth-century<br />

canonists. John Finnis and Germain Grisez also follow <strong>the</strong><br />

continuity line, but <strong>the</strong>y are really more Kantians than true<br />

Thomists. 13 In point of fact, Finnis and Grisez integrate<br />

natural law with a deontological <strong>the</strong>ory—with elements<br />

deriving from Kant. 14<br />

While not forgetting <strong>the</strong> many different positions taken<br />

by today’s supporters of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of natural rights, <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />

can be counted among those who, like Henry Veatch,<br />

base natural rights on <strong>the</strong> Aristotelian/Thomist <strong>the</strong>ory of<br />

natural law. 15 However, <strong>Rothbard</strong>’s position is particularly<br />

original for two reasons: first, because from <strong>the</strong> concept of<br />

self-ownership, he deduces <strong>the</strong> axiom of nonaggression, <strong>the</strong><br />

true cornerstone of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong>ian system, which he views<br />

as a clarification of <strong>the</strong> classic triad of <strong>the</strong> natural rights to<br />

life, liberty, and property; 16 second, because of <strong>the</strong> extreme<br />

conclusions that <strong>Rothbard</strong> arrives at regarding natural law<br />

and <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> state. In fact, <strong>Rothbard</strong> wants “to establish<br />

an objective ethics which affirms <strong>the</strong> overriding value of<br />

liberty, and morally condemns all forms of statism.” 17<br />

The <strong>the</strong>me of <strong>the</strong> rational foundation of ethics and<br />

absolute values becomes predominant in <strong>Rothbard</strong>’s comments<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Symposium on Relativism organized by <strong>the</strong><br />

13John Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon,<br />

1980).<br />

14Henry B. Veatch, Human Rights: Fact or Fancy? (Baton Rouge:<br />

Louisiana State University Press, 1985), p. 104.<br />

15For an examination of <strong>the</strong>se distinctions, see Raimondo<br />

Cubeddu, “Legge naturale o diritti naturali? Alcune questioni di<br />

filosofia politica liberale,” Quaderni dell’Istituto Acton 15 (2004).<br />

16It seems that <strong>Rothbard</strong> owes this idea to Ayn Rand. Cf. Ayn<br />

Rand, “Man’s Rights,” in The Virtue of Selfishness (New York:<br />

Signet, 1964).<br />

17<strong>Rothbard</strong>, The Ethics of Liberty, p. 213.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!