04.06.2013 Views

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LAW AND NATURE IN THE WORK OF MURRAY N. ROTHBARD 5<br />

respectively; and it is actually here that, for <strong>the</strong> first time,<br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong> thoroughly and extensively expresses his dissent<br />

from <strong>the</strong> ideas of <strong>the</strong> two great masters. The criticisms of<br />

<strong>Mises</strong> are <strong>the</strong> same as those contained in Ethics of Liberty,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> comments on <strong>the</strong> Symposium on Relativism of 1960<br />

mark <strong>the</strong> first time that <strong>Rothbard</strong> distances himself from<br />

some <strong>Mises</strong>ian positions. This is an interesting set of documents<br />

showing how <strong>the</strong> main lines of <strong>Rothbard</strong>ian thought<br />

were already firmly in place between <strong>the</strong> late 1950s and <strong>the</strong><br />

early 1960s as regards subjects such as <strong>the</strong> possibility of<br />

absolute ethical values based on natural law, <strong>the</strong> nonaggression<br />

axiom, and <strong>the</strong> criticism of <strong>the</strong> state.<br />

But that is not all. As early as 1948, we find in <strong>the</strong> comments<br />

made by <strong>the</strong> twenty-two-year-old <strong>Rothbard</strong> on Cutten’s<br />

paper, “Rugged Individualism,” arguments that demolish<br />

<strong>the</strong> aberrant <strong>the</strong>ories of social Darwinism, revealing that<br />

<strong>the</strong> young author’s individualism was already mature before<br />

he met <strong>Mises</strong>. Allusions to <strong>the</strong> immorality of <strong>the</strong> state’s initiatives<br />

for social welfare and criticisms of <strong>the</strong> state were a<br />

sign that <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>Rothbard</strong>’s thought already<br />

included <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong> state as aggressor.<br />

Alongside <strong>the</strong>se writings, <strong>the</strong>re are very positive comments<br />

on Lionel Robbins’s The Great Depression and on<br />

Caroline Robbins’s The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman.<br />

The volume by Lionel Robbins is presented as “one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> great economic works of our time.” 1 Robbins attributes<br />

responsibility for <strong>the</strong> Wall Street Crash of 1929 to <strong>the</strong> interventionist<br />

economic policies that caused <strong>the</strong> expansion of<br />

credit in <strong>the</strong> preceding years. After this, recovery was slow<br />

because of policies that interfered with <strong>the</strong> capacity of <strong>the</strong><br />

market to correct <strong>the</strong> structure of production that had been<br />

damaged by <strong>the</strong> preceding expansion of credit, <strong>the</strong>reby<br />

increasing <strong>the</strong> length and <strong>the</strong> severity of <strong>the</strong> Depression.<br />

1 <strong>Murray</strong> N. <strong>Rothbard</strong>, “Review of Lionel Robbins, The Great<br />

Depression” (London: Macmillan, 1937); see p. 79 in this volume.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!