04.06.2013 Views

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REVIEWS AND COMMENTS BY MURRAY N. ROTHBARD 125<br />

he believes that <strong>the</strong> world is governed by a whole host of<br />

capricious spirits and demons, each of which can only be<br />

propitiated—with only partial “success”—by ritual, by<br />

magic, and by a priestcraft of witch doctors who specialize<br />

in this propitiation. So fearful is <strong>the</strong> savage that he can do<br />

nothing on his own, that his individuality is virtually completely<br />

undeveloped—because <strong>the</strong> individual savage makes<br />

almost no use of his reason and of his mind. Therefore, virtually<br />

everything <strong>the</strong> savage does is governed by immutable,<br />

utterly irrational, taboos or command: by custom.<br />

And this is <strong>the</strong> fear-ridden, barely human, creature whom<br />

we, people who have used our intellect to “conquer” nature,<br />

are being asked to emulate, whom Polanyi extols as being<br />

truly “social,” and as being happily free of <strong>the</strong> “inhuman”<br />

despotism of <strong>the</strong> free market!<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> life of <strong>the</strong> savage, as Hobbes put it, is<br />

“nasty, brutish, and short.” His life expectancy is very short,<br />

and his life is ravaged by all manner of disease, disease that<br />

he can do nothing about except give food to witch doctors to<br />

utter incantations. The increasing conquest of disease has<br />

been made possible only by <strong>the</strong> advance of civilization: by<br />

<strong>the</strong> use of reason, by capitalism, and by <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

Polanyi admires <strong>the</strong> tribal and o<strong>the</strong>r caste societies,<br />

because “nobody starves.” 76 Everyone might admittedly be<br />

on a subsistence level, he concedes, but no individual<br />

starves. Is it that great a comfort that everyone starves<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r? This is a grotesque statement. The primitive<br />

world is—indeed all worlds before <strong>the</strong> Industrial Revolution<br />

were—constantly racked by famine and by plague. “Famine”<br />

was a continual occurrence before <strong>the</strong> Industrial Revolution;<br />

since <strong>the</strong> Industrial Revolution we have never heard of<br />

famine (<strong>the</strong> only recent famines have been in Communist<br />

China, and earlier, in Soviet Russia). Famine emerges from<br />

a lack of interlocal trade; when one locality’s food crop fails,<br />

76 Polanyi, The Great Transformation, p. 210.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!