04.06.2013 Views

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Murray N. Rothbard vs. the Philosophers - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MURRAY N. ROTHBARD VS. THE PHILOSOPHERS: UNPUBLISHED WRITINGS<br />

4 ON HAYEK, MISES, STRAUSS, AND POLYANI<br />

seminars at prestigious universities and was one of <strong>the</strong> most<br />

influential classical-liberal foundations in <strong>the</strong> United States.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 1940s, <strong>Rothbard</strong> had also been<br />

working part time as a consultant to <strong>the</strong> National Book<br />

Foundation (a subsidiary of <strong>the</strong> Volker Fund) and for <strong>the</strong><br />

Foundation for Economic Education. The Foundation for<br />

Economic Education (FEE) was founded by Leonard E.<br />

Read in 1946, with headquarters in a mansion on <strong>the</strong> banks<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Hudson River in New York. Its aim was to disseminate<br />

libertarian ideas, especially in <strong>the</strong> area of economics.<br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong> first made contact with this foundation when he<br />

requested a copy of a pamphlet against rent control, Roofs<br />

or Ceilings? written by Milton Friedman and George Stigler.<br />

The young <strong>Rothbard</strong> had attended Stigler’s economics lectures<br />

at Columbia University.<br />

The reviews and comments published in <strong>the</strong> following<br />

pages date from <strong>the</strong> years when <strong>Rothbard</strong> was working for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Volker Fund, and <strong>the</strong> two classical-liberal foundations,<br />

National Book Foundation, and FEE. Given <strong>the</strong>ir nature,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y comprise a set of writings that are very heterogeneous,<br />

composed in a style that is sometimes informal and marked<br />

by <strong>the</strong> biting irony that was to become a typical feature of<br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong>’s prose. In <strong>the</strong>m, one can find some of <strong>the</strong> major<br />

<strong>the</strong>mes that characterize <strong>the</strong> thought of <strong>the</strong> author.<br />

These writings are published here for <strong>the</strong> first time, in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir original English, and <strong>the</strong> decision to publish <strong>the</strong>m was<br />

made for various reasons. Some pieces clarify <strong>the</strong> author’s<br />

position in relation to intellectuals such as Leo Strauss and<br />

Karl Polanyi on subjects such as progress, technology, and<br />

on what today is termed “globalization.” O<strong>the</strong>rs, such as <strong>the</strong><br />

two sets of comments on Hayek’s Constitution of Liberty,<br />

contain not only <strong>the</strong> criticisms—later found in Ethics of Liberty—of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hayekian concept of “coercion,” but also some<br />

interesting criticisms of <strong>the</strong> rule of law as a guarantee of liberty<br />

and of <strong>the</strong> absence of references to natural law in<br />

Hayek’s work. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>se writings help shed light<br />

on <strong>the</strong> genesis of <strong>Rothbard</strong>’s thought. His criticisms of<br />

Hayek’s and <strong>Mises</strong>’s ideas date back to 1958 and 1960

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!