04.06.2013 Views

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Talks</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Ramana</strong> <strong>Maharshi</strong><br />

Regarding ajnana in early youth and jnana at the present time, <strong>Sri</strong><br />

Bhagavan said: There is no jnana as it is commonly understood.<br />

The ordinary ideas of jnana and ajnana are only relative and false.<br />

They are not real and therefore not abiding. The true state is the<br />

non-dual Self. It is eternal and abides whether one is aware or not.<br />

It is like kanthabharana or the tenth man.<br />

D.: Someone else points it out.<br />

M.: That one is not external. You mistake the body for the Guru. But<br />

the Guru does not think himself so. He is the formless Self. That<br />

is <strong>with</strong>in you; he appears <strong>with</strong>out only to guide you.<br />

Talk 500.<br />

D.: When all the thoughts are banished and the mind is still or enters<br />

into a state of nothingness or emptiness, what is the nature of effort<br />

needed on the part of the ‘seeker’ to have a pratyakshabhava of<br />

the ‘sought’ (e.g., seeing a mango as a mango)?<br />

M.: Who sees nothingness or emptiness? What is pratyaksha? Do you call<br />

perception of mango pratyaksha? It involves the play of karma, karta,<br />

and karya (action, doer and deed). So it is relative and not absolute.<br />

Because you see a thing now you say there is nothing afterwards (i.e.,<br />

when you no longer see it). Both are functions of the mind. What lies<br />

behind both these assertions is pratyaksha. There is indriya pratyaksha<br />

(directly perceived by senses), manasa pratyaksha (directly perceived<br />

by the mind) and sakshat pratyaksha (realised as the very Being). The<br />

last alone is true. The others are relative and untrue.<br />

D.: If no effort is needed, can the perpetuated state of emptiness of<br />

mind be called the state of realisation?<br />

M.: Effort is needed so long as there is mind. The state of emptiness<br />

has been the bone of contention in all philosophies.<br />

D.: Is there anything like pratyakshabhava in the state of realisation<br />

or is realisation merely felt or experienced as the very Being or<br />

Sthiti of the soul?<br />

M.: Pratyaksha is very being and it is not feeling, etc.<br />

D.: Until the seeker realizes that he is the sought, the above questions<br />

arise for him (the former).<br />

497

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!