Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi
M.: There is no connection between Self-Realisation and individual
predispositions (samskara). It is not always possible to live up to
the ideal of the Guru.
D.: Do not passions affect Realisation?
M.: The attempt to cleanse oneself will be automatic.
D.: Is it not necessary to wash off all impurities before Realisation?
M.: Jnana will wash them clean.
D.: Gandhiji is often perplexed finding his intimate disciples going
wrong. He wonders how it could happen and thinks that it is due
to his own defects. Is it so?
M.: (Sri Bhagavan smiled and answered after a few minutes) Gandhiji
has struggled so long to perfect himself. All others will be right
in due course.
D.: Is the Hindu view of reincarnation correct?
M.: No definite answer is possible for this question. There are pros
and cons for the view. Even the present birth is denied natvevaham
jatu nasam etc., (Bhagavad Gita). We were never born, etc.
D.: Is not individuality anadi (without beginning)?
M.: Investigate and see if there is any individuality at all. Ask this
question after solving this problem.
Nammalvar says: “In ignorance I took the ego to be myself;
however, with right knowledge, the ego is nowhere and only you
remain as the SELF.”
Both monists and dualists are agreed on the necessity of Self-
Realisation. Let us do it first and then discuss the side-issues.
Advaita or dvaita cannot be decided on theoretical considerations
alone. If the Self is realised the question will not arise at all. Even
Suka had no confidence in his brahmacharya whereas Sri Krishna
was sure of his brahmacharya. Self-Realisation is designated by so
many different names, satya, brahmacharya, etc. What is natural
to the state of Self-Realisation forms the disciplinary course in
the other state. “I-am-the-body” idea will become extinct only on
Self-Realisation. With its extinction the vasanas become extinct
and all virtues will remain ever.
489