04.06.2013 Views

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Talks</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Ramana</strong> <strong>Maharshi</strong><br />

power (sakti), life current (prana), etc. Seek your source; the search<br />

takes you to the Heart automatically. The antahkaranas are only<br />

ideas (kalpana) to explain the subtle body (sukshma sarira). The<br />

physical body (sarira) is made up of the elements: earth, air, fire,<br />

water and ether; it is insentient. The Self is pure and self-luminous<br />

and thus self-evident. The relation between the two is sought to<br />

be established by positing a subtle body, composed of the subtle<br />

aspects of the five elements on the one hand, and the reflected<br />

light of the Self on the other. In this way the subtle body which<br />

is synonymous <strong>with</strong> the mind, is both sentient and insentient, i.e.,<br />

abhasa. Again, by the play of the pure quality (satva guna) on the<br />

elements, their brightness (satva aspect) manifests as the mind<br />

(manas), and the senses (jnanendriyas); by the play of rajas (active<br />

quality), the raja (active) aspect manifests as life (prana) and limbs<br />

(karmendriyas); by the play of dullness (tamas) the tama (dark)<br />

aspect manifests as the gross phenomena of the body, etc.<br />

D.: But the mind is reputed to have these three qualities also.<br />

M.: Yes. There is purity (satva) in satva (in the pure quality); activity<br />

in it (rajas in satva); and dullness also (tamas in satva); and so on,<br />

Suddha satva is quite pure; misra (mixed satva) is a combination<br />

of satva <strong>with</strong> other qualities. The quality satva implies only its<br />

predominance over the other two qualities.<br />

Later <strong>Sri</strong> Bhagavan continued: The intricate maze of philosophy<br />

of different schools is said to clarify matters and reveal the Truth.<br />

But in fact they create confusion where no confusion need exist.<br />

To understand anything there must be the Self. The Self is obvious.<br />

Why not remain as the Self? What need to explain the non-self?<br />

Take the Vedanta for instance: They say there are fifteen kinds of prana.<br />

The student is made to commit the names to memory and also their<br />

functions. The air goes up and is called prana; goes down and is called<br />

apana; operates the indriyas and is called something. Why all this?<br />

Why do you classify, give names and enumerate the functions, and so<br />

on? Is it not enough to know that one prana does the whole work?<br />

The antahkarana thinks, desires, wills, reasons, etc., and each<br />

function is attributed to one name such as mind, intellect, etc. Has<br />

anyone seen the pranas or the antahkaranas? Have they any real<br />

375

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!