04.06.2013 Views

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Talks</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Ramana</strong> <strong>Maharshi</strong><br />

the adhishthana of Jiva is one; that of Isvara is another; how can<br />

these two adhishthanas become one? He replies, there are the same<br />

adhara for both the adhishthanas.<br />

Furthermore he mentions several khyatis;<br />

(1) asat-khyati: rope being present, there appears the snake which<br />

is not present there.<br />

(2) sat-khyati: rope itself looking like snake.<br />

(3) atma-khyati: rope remaining unidentified, the remembrance of<br />

snake, formerly seen elsewhere, creates the illusion.<br />

(4) akhyati: totally unreal.<br />

(5) anayatha-khyati: mental image of snake projected and seen as<br />

if it were in front of oneself.<br />

(6) anirvachaniya-khyati: inexplicable.<br />

Here he raises the question: Should the world be any one of these,<br />

whether illusory or unreal; it must be the result of previous experience.<br />

It must have been real at that time: real once, must be real always.<br />

He answers it: the experience need not necessarily be real; not having<br />

seen a real snake, but only seeing a picture of it and gaining an impression,<br />

one can mistake a rope to be a snake. Thus the world need not be real.<br />

Why waste time in such polemics? Only turn your mind inward<br />

and spend the time usefully.<br />

In the union of the individual <strong>with</strong> the Supreme, the Supreme is<br />

hearsay and the individual directly experienced. You can make use<br />

only of direct experience; therefore look who you are.<br />

Why is Isvara mentioned then?<br />

Because you see the world and want to know how it came into<br />

being. They say that it was created by God. If you know that He<br />

created you and all else, your mind is a little satisfied and becomes<br />

less restless than otherwise. But it is not realisation. It can be only<br />

if you realise yourself; this is Perfection or Realisation, etc.<br />

To resume polemics - the author of Vritti Prabhakara claims to have<br />

studied 350,000 books before writing this book. What is the use?<br />

Can they bring in Realisation of the Self? Vichara Sagara is full<br />

of logic and technical terms. Can these ponderous volumes serve<br />

311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!