04.06.2013 Views

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi Complete ... - BrahminVoice.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Talks</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Ramana</strong> <strong>Maharshi</strong><br />

M.: It is according to circumstances. They all mean the Self. Para means<br />

‘not relative’ or ‘beyond the relative’, that is to say, the Absolute.<br />

D.: Should I meditate on the right chest in order to meditate on the Heart?<br />

M.: The Heart is not physical. Meditation should not be on the right<br />

or the left. Meditation should be on the Self. Everyone knows ‘I<br />

am’. Who is the ‘I’? It will be neither <strong>with</strong>in nor <strong>with</strong>out, neither<br />

on the right nor on the left. ‘I am’ - that is all.<br />

The Heart is the centre from which everything springs. Because<br />

you see the world, the body and so on, it is said that there is a centre<br />

for these, which is called the Heart. When you are in the Heart, the<br />

Heart is known to be neither the centre nor the circumference. There<br />

is nothing else. Whose centre could it be?<br />

D.: May I take it that the Self and the non-Self are like substance<br />

and its shadow?<br />

M.: Substance and shadow are for the one who sees only the shadow<br />

and mistakes it for the substance and sees its shadow also. But<br />

there is neither substance nor shadow for the one who is aware<br />

only of the Reality.<br />

D.: Buddha, when asked if there is the ego, was silent; when asked if there<br />

is no ego, he was silent; asked if there is God, he was silent; asked if there<br />

is no God, he was silent. Silence was his answer for all these. Mahayana<br />

and Hinayana schools have both misinterpreted his silence because<br />

they say that he was an atheist. If he was an atheist, why should he<br />

have spoken of nirvana, of births and deaths, of karma, reincarnations<br />

and dharma? His interpreters are wrong. Is it not so?<br />

M.: You are right.<br />

27th October, 1936<br />

Talk 274.<br />

The Muslim Professor asked how Vaishnavism can be reconciled to<br />

Advaitism.<br />

M.: The Vaishnavites call themselves Visishtadvaitins. This is also<br />

Advaita. Just as the individual body comprises the soul, the ego<br />

and the gross body, so also God comprises Paramatma, the world<br />

and the individuals.<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!