04.06.2013 Views

1 zimbabwe election support network [zesn] - Nehanda Radio

1 zimbabwe election support network [zesn] - Nehanda Radio

1 zimbabwe election support network [zesn] - Nehanda Radio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

formal government in place at a time when hard decisions are desperately needed to bail out<br />

the country from its socioeconomic meltdown.<br />

The two political parties engage in a dialogue in order to find a lasting solution to the political<br />

impasse. Such a dialogue should however be guided by the “will of the people” as anything<br />

short of that constitutes a truce and not a permanent settlement. There is no substitute for<br />

negotiations. Lessons must be drawn from power-sharing experiences in other countries, the<br />

most recent being the Kenyan case. Experiences must also be drawn from Zimbabwe’s first<br />

Government of Unity as well as the Government of Unity following the 1987 Unity Accord.<br />

While disagreement over the outcome of the <strong>election</strong>s rages on realities on the ground compel<br />

the incumbent and the MDC leader to urgently engage each other or call for a fresh <strong>election</strong><br />

under a conducive environment and conditions that guarantee respect of the will of the people.<br />

It is time for hard talk. However, promising as it is, the power sharing route is no stroll in a<br />

garden park. Finding a solution to the Zimbabwe crisis is not going to be easy given the tangent<br />

stance of the main political actors. How far each of them is prepared to climb down and how far<br />

the mediator will slowly nudge them from their positions, will be decisive in determining either<br />

the collapse or the success of the negotiations.<br />

The fact that these negotiations are a follow-up to the 29 March and 27 June Elections makes<br />

the negotiation process even more protracted and delicate as it is imperative for negotiators to<br />

agree on what basis power sharing is based. Is it based on the 27 June poll or 29 March poll<br />

results? This question is particularly burning given that both contenders have hard-line<br />

positions on this sticky issue. How the mediator will handle this tricky question without<br />

shortchanging the will of the people will prove a test case of his mediation management<br />

capacity. It is also imperative to agree on who will head the proposed power sharing. Is the<br />

nation heading for an MDC or ZANU PF–headed Government? Who will wield<br />

executive/ceremonial powers? How are ministerial responsibilities to be shared? These<br />

questions are particularly tricky given the ideological and personality differences and mistrust<br />

between the two main political actors.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!