04.06.2013 Views

ROLE OF DIOSMIN-HESPERIDIN COMBINATION (DAFLON ...

ROLE OF DIOSMIN-HESPERIDIN COMBINATION (DAFLON ...

ROLE OF DIOSMIN-HESPERIDIN COMBINATION (DAFLON ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>DIOSMIN</strong>-<strong>HESPERIDIN</strong> <strong>COMBINATION</strong><br />

Egypt. J. Otolaryngol., Vol. 25, No. 1 January, 2009<br />

<strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>DIOSMIN</strong>-<strong>HESPERIDIN</strong> <strong>COMBINATION</strong> (<strong>DAFLON</strong>® SERVIER) IN<br />

TREATMENT <strong>OF</strong> VASOMOTOR RHINITIS <strong>OF</strong> PREGNANCY;<br />

A RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY<br />

Waleed Ezzat, 1 Samia Fawaz, 1 Ali El Makhzangy, 1 Ahmed Rateb 2<br />

1 OtoRhinolaryngology, 2 Gynecology and Obstetrics departments, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Egypt<br />

Objective: To determine the validity and efficacy of use of micronised purified Diosmin-Hesperidin combination (Daflon®<br />

Servier), a known safe drug in pregnancy, in the improvement of symptoms of females suffering from vasomotor rhinitis of<br />

pregnancy (VMRP).<br />

Design: A prospective non company sponsored randomized control study.<br />

Setting: Antenatal and ENT outpatient clinics of Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.<br />

Methods Forty-eight pregnant women suffering from symptoms and signs of VMRP attending the antenatal clinic were asked<br />

to fill up a questionnaire and referred to the ENT clinic for objective assessment and counseling. They were subsequently<br />

followed up in both clinics till delivery*<br />

Main outcome measures: Subjective grading of VMRP was done using the 7 most related items from the modified sinonasal<br />

outcome test (SNOT) scale scoring system, and objective grading of it using the rhinoscan acoustic rhinometer (by<br />

Rhinometrics®).<br />

Results: The Diosmin-hesperidin combination only group showed similar response to Fluticasone propionate, while<br />

combination of Diosmin-hesperidin and Fluticasone propionate gave better response than the Fluticasone propionate only<br />

group.<br />

Conclusions: Diosmin-hesperidin combination is an effective treatment line in the control of symptoms of VMRP, either<br />

alone or in combination with Fluticasone propionate.<br />

Keywords: Vasomotor rhinitis, pregnancy, Diosmin-Hesperdin combination.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Vasomotor rhinitis is characterized by prominent<br />

symptoms of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and congestion.<br />

These symptoms are excessive at times and are exacerbated<br />

by certain odors (e.g., perfumes, cigarette smoke); alcohol;<br />

spicy foods; emotions; pregnancy and environmental<br />

factors such as temperature, and barometric pressure<br />

changes. (1)<br />

Pregnancy is a delightful event that most women will<br />

experience at some time of their fertile lives, but like any<br />

other event in which there are drastic physiologic changes<br />

occurring in the body to fulfill its requirements, it does not<br />

pass without some annoyance. One of these annoyances<br />

can be vasomotor rhinitis of pregnancy (VMRP).<br />

The pathophysiology of VMRP has been widely studied by<br />

several researchers, and the various factors that were<br />

alleged or proven to be responsible for this condition<br />

included; 1) raised estrogen levels, acting directly (2)<br />

producing nasal congestion, and indirectly causing<br />

histamine release, cyclicAMP production, (3) and Vasoactive<br />

Intestinal Peptide (VIP) release by nasal nerve terminals, (4)<br />

all causing congestion. 2) Raised serum progesterone levels<br />

leading to nasal vascular wall smooth muscle relaxation,<br />

and subsequently vascular pooling. (5) 3) Increased blood<br />

volume, which also increases vascular pooling (5) and 4) the<br />

continuous secretion of placental growth hormone (PGH)<br />

after the first trimester, also leading to effects similar to<br />

EJO, Vol. 25, No 1 Jan., 2009 61


progesterone, (6) namely increasing extracellular volume<br />

and peripheral vascular dilatation). (7)<br />

Other mechanisms contributing to VMRP are explained as<br />

follows; a) nasal congestion by vascular smooth muscle<br />

relaxation, and increased extracellular volume, all affect the<br />

vascular tone of the capacitance vessels, with the resultant<br />

additional nasal obstruction. (8) Plasma extravasation also<br />

creates fluid which contributes to interstitial swelling and<br />

increased nasal secretions, (9,10). b) vascular distension and<br />

osmolar changes lead to neural depolarization of the<br />

branches of the trigeminal nerve with reflexes ensuing from<br />

the parasympathetic nerves, leading to increased secretions<br />

and sneezing in addition to the depolarization of type C<br />

nociceptive fibers in afferent neurons of the V nerve with<br />

resultant local release of neuropeptides as substance P and<br />

neurokinin A, (9,11,12,13) which in turn produce local<br />

inflammatory effects (neurogenic inflammation) directly<br />

affecting blood flow and glandular secretion (12) by acting<br />

on endothelial junctions opening them and allowing<br />

plasma to escape (10,12,14) c) An additional proposed factor<br />

may be the non-immune degranulation of mast cells with<br />

the release of chemical mediators including histamine and<br />

prostaglandin E215 with the resultant increase in the<br />

sensitivity of nerve endings and increased vascular<br />

permeability and cellular recruitment. (7) To<br />

summarize, there are alterations in blood flow, increased<br />

nasal secretions, and imbalance in neuropeptide function.<br />

Recent work suggested that fibroblasts in nasal mucosa of<br />

pregnant females are influenced by progesterone and these<br />

subsequently affect the extracelluler matrix. They also<br />

proposed that oestrogen and progesterone change<br />

neurotransmitter concentrations such as substance P to<br />

cause the symptoms of nasal stuffiness experienced by<br />

pregnant women. (16)<br />

Diagnosis of VMRP in general is made by default after<br />

excluding other causes of rhinitis. (8) Nasal cytology may be<br />

a simple but necessary option to rule out eosinophilic<br />

rhinitis, or non allergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome<br />

(NARES). VMRP is usually diagnosed in the second<br />

trimester of pregnancy when all the previously mentioned<br />

factors start to appear and become active with peaking of<br />

hormonal levels. Usually congestion is more problematic<br />

than nasal discharge. (8)<br />

Treatment of vasomotor rhinitis (VMR) in general is often<br />

unsatisfactory, and medications that have been tried<br />

include those used for allergic rhinitis, but they are usually<br />

not as effective as they are in allergic rhinitis. In VMRP the<br />

issue of possible fetal harm is another hamper, so most if<br />

not all physicians ask the patient to tolerate the condition,<br />

or just revert to the regular vasoconstrictive nasal agents<br />

with possible suffering of their long term side effects. (17)<br />

Ezzat, W. et al<br />

Local nasal steroids have been used for several indications<br />

starting from the second trimester of pregnancy and with<br />

no apparent teratogenic effect, but its efficacy in VMRP has<br />

been questioned by many. On the other hand, pregnant<br />

females often suffer from varicosities, either pelvic, or in<br />

the lower limbs or both, and for a long time have been<br />

treated by the natural flaviniods as the commercial<br />

diosmin-hesperidin combination (Daflon®, Servier), which<br />

withstood the test of safety, but this drug has never been<br />

tested in the local control of the congestion that occurs in<br />

the nose in cases of VMRP.<br />

The general modes of action of micronized flavinoids are<br />

through increasing vascular tone, protection of vascular<br />

endothelium (both normal and diseased) and decreasing<br />

edema. (18,19) It has also been demonstrated to have antiinflammatory<br />

effects through reduction of histamine,<br />

bradykinin and leukotrienes release, thus preventing<br />

escape of macromolecules from the microcirculation,<br />

decreasing the activation of complement system, and<br />

preventing adherence of leukocytes to endothelial cells<br />

diminishing capillary permeability. (18-23)<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

To determine the validity and efficacy of use of micronized<br />

purified Diosmin-Hesperidin combination (Daflon®<br />

Servier), a known safe drug in pregnancy, in the<br />

improvement of symptoms of women suffering from<br />

vasomotor rhinitis of pregnancy (VMRP).<br />

PATIENTS AND METHODS<br />

Design: A prospective non company sponsored<br />

randomized case control study.<br />

Material: In this study we selected 48 pregnant women<br />

referred to our E.N.T clinic, as they specifically complained<br />

from symptoms related to VMRP. The patient was selected<br />

by the obstetrician when she complained of annoying nasal<br />

obstruction on routine inquiry during each follow up and<br />

subsequently was referred to the otolaryngologist.<br />

Inclusion criteria:<br />

The studied women were all between the age 20 and 35<br />

years, regardless of parity.<br />

All were healthy, and were not receiving any additional<br />

treatments for any disease, aside from calcium and iron<br />

supplements.<br />

Exclusion criteria:<br />

1) Association with any acute or chronic gestational or<br />

non gestational disease.<br />

2) Presence of any manifestation of complicated<br />

pregnancy.<br />

62 Egypt. J. Otolaryngol.


3) Any prior nasal allergy or chronic nasal disease.<br />

4) Also any nasal surgery, irrespective of its nature<br />

Methodology: After appropriate counseling, the patients<br />

were asked to fill out an initial questionnaire (modified<br />

Sino-nasal-outcome-test, SNOT) 24. A modification of the<br />

SNOT test was used addressing 7 common nasal related<br />

symptoms. The test evaluates the degree of affection in a<br />

numerical value ranging from 0 to 5, where 0 meant that<br />

the symptom did not exist, and 5 means that she is<br />

suffering from that symptom all or most of the time, with<br />

values 2, 3 and 4 in between, the grade of symptoms<br />

included in the SNOT test and their results were collected<br />

to be analyzed<br />

A more detailed history was taken by the otolaryngologist<br />

in order to determine the onset of the complaint and to rule<br />

out possible exclusion criteria that were missed, After<br />

selecting the subjects they were informed and consented in<br />

writing that they are receiving a new untested treatment<br />

modality and a few paragraphs about the drugs used, with<br />

their references and websites for further reading, were<br />

given to the patients on demand for further information<br />

about the medications. An objective rhinometric test using<br />

the rhinoscan acoustic rhinometer (by Rhinometrics®) was<br />

performed for patients who consented. The rhinometric test<br />

was done twice with an interval of 30 minutes in-between,<br />

no vasoconstrictive or topical agent was given and the<br />

subject just had to blow her nose twice before each testing.<br />

An average of the two readings was taken, and then the<br />

readings of both sides were also averaged, and calculated<br />

in cubic centimeters. This value was considered as the<br />

baseline patency value for that specific subject before<br />

commencing treatment.<br />

The patients were divided into three groups. The line of<br />

treatment was chosen according to a random calendar<br />

system, i.e. patients attending the ORL clinic on day 1-15<br />

from the Gregorian month would be group A, those<br />

attending on day 16-22 would be group B, and those<br />

attending on day 23-31 would be group C. Doubling the<br />

duration of patient choice for the main study group A was<br />

intended to widen the database of this specific group.<br />

<strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>DIOSMIN</strong>-<strong>HESPERIDIN</strong> <strong>COMBINATION</strong><br />

Group A included 24 patients and they were treated using<br />

Diosmin-hesperidin combination only. Group B included<br />

14 females, and were treated by Diosmin-hesperidin<br />

combination and a local nasal steroid, namely fluticasone<br />

propionate (Flixonase®,GSK), and group C included 12<br />

females treated by Fluticasone propionate only.<br />

The dose of administered Diosmin-hesperidin combination<br />

was the therapeutically producer recommended 500<br />

milligram twice daily, the dose of Fluticasone propionate<br />

was also the recommended 2 puffs (100<br />

microgram)/nostril/day.<br />

A follow up visit to the otolaryngologist was scheduled<br />

after 4 weeks and both the SNOT and rhinometric tests<br />

were repeated in exactly the same manner as previously<br />

mentioned. The subject was asked to account on her<br />

symptoms in the last two weeks of treatment and not the<br />

period at the start of therapy.<br />

The study took 7 months to be completed.<br />

Statistical analysis: The results were tabulated and data<br />

were analyzed using the statistical package for the social<br />

science (SPSS, version 15, Inc., Chicago, IL) When applying<br />

statistical analysis for the SNOT test, the total score of all<br />

the symptoms was calculated by simple addition of the<br />

individual scores, the scale was from zero (absolutely no<br />

symptoms) to 35 (maximum complaint from all the<br />

symptoms all the time). The distributional characteristics of<br />

the continuous variables were examined by Kolmogorov-<br />

Smirnov test. Normally distributed continuous variables<br />

were examined using one-way analysis of variance and<br />

Tukey test. Skewed variables were examined using<br />

Kruskall Wallis & Mann-Whitney U tests. X2 analysis used<br />

for frequency data. Fisher exact test was used when cell<br />

size was small. Significance level was established at P


Statistical analysis of the results showed that all three<br />

groups were statistically equivalent when assessed before<br />

treatment (non-significant statistical difference), but in the<br />

post-treatment assessment there was a highly significant<br />

difference in both the subjective and objective findings,<br />

always in favor of post-treatment assessment (P


We compared three groups of women by using three<br />

modalities of treatment. Comparing the results of the three<br />

groups with each other, which revealed that Diosminhesperidin<br />

combination when used alone showed an<br />

improvement both subjectively and objectively from before<br />

to after treatment. While the combination group (group B)<br />

showed a highly significant improvement, which is better<br />

than the other two groups.<br />

These findings implicate that Diosmin-hesperidin<br />

combination, as a micronized flavinoid drug, can and<br />

should be used in VMRP as an effective line of treatment,<br />

whether alone instead of local nasal steroid to give the<br />

same improvement with more range of safety to the<br />

pregnant women or in combination with other lines in<br />

severe cases to give better response.<br />

Also in our study no side effects occurred to the pregnant<br />

women or their offspring after delivery.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Our findings demonstrate that the use of Diosminhesperidin<br />

combination, either as a monotherapy, or in<br />

combination with local nasal steroids, in the regular doses<br />

of 1000 mg/day, has proved to be a safe as well as effective<br />

mode of treatment of VMRP.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1) Wheeler PW, Wheeler SF. Vasomotor Rhinitis. American<br />

Family Physician. 2005;72:1057-62.<br />

2) Toppozada H, Toppozada M, El-Ghazzawi I, Elwany S. The<br />

human respiratory nasal mucosa in females using<br />

contraceptive pills. J Laryngol Otol. 1984;98:43-51.<br />

3) Wilson JA, Hawkins RA, Sangster K. Estimation of estrogen<br />

and progesterone receptors in chronic rhinitis. Clin<br />

Otolaryngol. 1986;11:213-18.<br />

4) Bende M, Hallgårde U, Sjögren C, Uvnäs-Moberg K.<br />

Nasal congestion during pregnancy. Clin Otolaryngol.<br />

1989;14:385-7.<br />

5) Schatz M, Zeiger RS. Diagnosis and management of rhinitis<br />

during pregnancy. Allergy Proc. 1988;9:545-54.<br />

6) Eriksson L, Frankenne F, Eden S, Hennen G, von Schoultz B.<br />

Growth hormone 24-hour serum profiles during pregnancy:<br />

lack of pulsatility for the secretion of the placental variant. Br<br />

J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:949-53.<br />

7) Bengtsson B-Å, Rosén T, Johansson J-O, Johannsson G,<br />

Oscarsson J, Landin-Wilhelmsen K.Cardiovascular risk factors<br />

in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Endocrinol<br />

Metab.1995;2:29-35.<br />

<strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>DIOSMIN</strong>-<strong>HESPERIDIN</strong> <strong>COMBINATION</strong><br />

8) Ayars GH, Altman LC, McManus MM. Injurious effect of the<br />

eosinophil peroxidase-halide system and major basic protein<br />

on human nasal epithelium in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis.<br />

1987;135:848-53.<br />

9) Druce HM, Baraniuk JN. Neuroregulation of mucosal<br />

vasculature. In Busse WW, Holgate ST (eds):<br />

Asthma and Rhinitis. Cambridge, MA, Blackwell Sciences.<br />

1995;742-51.<br />

10) Persson CGA, Greiff L, Andersson M. Mucosal exudation of<br />

plasma in asthma and rhinitis. In; Busse WW, Holgate ST<br />

(eds): Asthma and Rhinitis. Cambridge, MA, Blackwell<br />

Sciences. 1995;733-41.<br />

11) Lund VJ. Nasal physiology: Neurochemical receptors,<br />

nasal cycle, and ciliary action. Allergy Asthma Proc.<br />

1996;17:179-84.<br />

12) Baraniuk JN. Sensory, parasympathetic, and sympathetic<br />

neural influences in the nasal mucosa. J Allergy Clin<br />

Immunol. 1992;90:1045-50.<br />

13) Baraniuk JN, Kaliner MA. Functional activity of upper-airway<br />

nerves. In Busse WW, Holgate ST (eds): Asthma and Rhinitis.<br />

Cambridge, MA, Blackwell Sciences. 1995;:652-66.<br />

14) Widdicombe JG. Microvascular anatomy of the airways. In<br />

Busse WW, Holgate ST (eds): Asthma and Rhinitis.<br />

Cambridge, MA, Blackwell Sciences. 1995;722-32.<br />

15) Togias A, Lykens K, Kagey-Sobotka A. Studies on the<br />

relationships between sensitivity to cold, dry air,<br />

hyperosmolal solutions, and histamine in the adult nose. Am<br />

Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:1428-33.<br />

16) Philpott C.M, Conboy P, AL-Azzawi F, Murty G. Nasal<br />

physiological changes during pregnancy. Clin Otolaryngol<br />

Allied Sci. 2004;29:343-51.<br />

17) Sobol S.E, Frenkiel S, Nachtigal D, Wiener D, Teblum C.<br />

Clinical manifestations of sinonasal pathology during<br />

pregnancy. J Otolaryngol. 2001;30:24-8.<br />

18) Acar TI, Tacyildiz RI, Vahapog H. Efficacy of micronized<br />

flavinoid fraction on healing in thermally injured rats. Ann<br />

Burns Fire Disast.2002;15:1.<br />

19) Bouskela E, Svenjo E. Oxidant-induced increase in vascular<br />

permeability is inhibited by oral administration of Arvenum<br />

500 and alfa-tocopherol. Int. Journ. Microcirc. 1997;9-11.<br />

20) Allegra C. An original microhaemorheological approach to<br />

the pharmacological effects of Arvenum 500 in severe chronic<br />

venous insufficiency. Int. Journ. Microcirc. 1995;15:50-4.<br />

21) Allegra C, Bartolo M, Carioti B, Cassiani D. Effectiveness of<br />

Daflon 500mg on microlymphatics proceedings of the World<br />

Congress for microcirculation, Munich. 1996.<br />

EJO, Vol. 25, No 1 Jan., 2009 65


22) Curri SB, Bacci PA, Lattarulo P, Albergati F. Immediate and<br />

long term effects on microcirculation before and after 2<br />

months of Endermologic treatment. XXth. Congress of Italian<br />

Society of Aesthetic Medicine, Rome. 1999.<br />

23) Lattarulo P, Bacci PA. Mancini S., Evaluations of integrated<br />

treatment in phlebolymphology using Endermology and<br />

Diosmine micronized Esperidine, Abstract of European<br />

Congress on Phlebology U.I.P., Breme. 1999:58.<br />

Ezzat, W. et al<br />

24) Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG, Richards ML. Psychometric and<br />

clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test<br />

(SNOT-20).Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126:41-7.<br />

25) Ambro B.T., Scheid S.C., Pribitkin E.A. Prescribing guidelines<br />

for ENT medications during pregnancy. Ear Nose Throat J.<br />

2003;82:565-8.<br />

66 Egypt. J. Otolaryngol.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!