The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
grave <strong>of</strong> North Pontic steppe type, in which a man was<br />
buried with his wife. <strong>The</strong> skeleton <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> man was associated<br />
with a stone battle-axe, copper daggers, an arrowhead,<br />
and a pot. Skull injuries attested for <strong>the</strong> skeleton <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
woman suggest that she was dispatched on <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> her<br />
husband to accompany him in <strong>the</strong> afterlife according to <strong>the</strong><br />
likewise North Pontic rite <strong>of</strong> suttee. O<strong>the</strong>r Rinaldone<br />
tombs produced horse remains – a feature pointing once<br />
again in <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> North Pontic steppe where <strong>the</strong><br />
animal in question was not only abundantly found but also<br />
suggested to have been already domesticated from <strong>the</strong> 4th<br />
millennium BC onwards. 308<br />
From a linguistic point <strong>of</strong> view, it has been observed<br />
by Hans Krahe that Tuscany, with names like Alma, Armenta,<br />
Aventia, Albinia, Arnus, Elsa, Auser, Ausenna, and<br />
Visentios, is included in <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> his Old European<br />
river names. 309 <strong>The</strong>se names, which are based on<br />
well-attested Proto-Indo-European roots, may well be<br />
rooted in <strong>the</strong> 3rd millennium BC, as <strong>the</strong>ir overall distribution,<br />
as rightly stressed by Peter Kitson, coincides remarkably<br />
with that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bell Beaker culture. 310<br />
Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> bearers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rinaldone culture are<br />
likely to be held responsible for <strong>the</strong> given layer <strong>of</strong> Old<br />
European river names in Tuscany.<br />
All in all, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong>re can be distinguished at least<br />
three different layers in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> Indo-Europeanization<br />
<strong>of</strong> Tuscany: (1) <strong>the</strong> bearers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rinaldone culture <strong>of</strong><br />
North Pontic steppe affiliations (3rd millennium BC onwards),<br />
(2) <strong>the</strong> Osco-Umbrians and Latin-Faliscans, which<br />
we have held responsible for <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European<br />
Urnfield culture in Italy (12th century BC onwards),<br />
and (3) Luwian population groups originating from <strong>the</strong><br />
308 Mallory 1989: 93-4; 198-201; in my opinion Drews 2004: 15-<br />
9 goes too far in discrediting <strong>the</strong> Dereivka bone cheekpieces as<br />
evidence for horse control.<br />
309 Krahe 1962: 304; note that Auser and Ausenna may have been<br />
introduced later by <strong>the</strong> Ausones or Oscans, just like <strong>the</strong> Ombrone<br />
is likely to be named by <strong>the</strong> Umbrians. <strong>The</strong> Tiber is <strong>the</strong> Etruscan<br />
and hence latest name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foremost river in Tuscany (< Luwian<br />
Tiwat/ra- “sun-god”), which used to be called Albula (< PIE *alb h -<br />
“white”) in an earlier period, see Krahe 1964: 53.<br />
310 Kitson 1997: 204-5; cf. Tovar 1977: maps 1-6 with Harrison<br />
1988: 12, map 1. Note that Tuscany is not included in <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bell Beaker culture, but <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong><br />
Palermo, where a twin catacomb grave from <strong>the</strong> Aeneolithic<br />
Conca d’Oro culture has been found (see de Vries 1976: 210-11),<br />
may suggest a connection between <strong>the</strong> Bell Beaker culture on <strong>the</strong><br />
one hand and <strong>the</strong> catacomb culture on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
87<br />
north-Aegean and southwest Anatolia, introducing <strong>the</strong> Orientalizing<br />
culture (c. 700 BC onwards). And all this in a<br />
region which Massimo Pallottino in a lifelong effort would<br />
have us believe (and succeeded in making his fellow<br />
Etruscologists believe) to be <strong>the</strong> home <strong>of</strong> a pre-Indo-<br />
European rest group!<br />
Postscriptum<br />
In an article about Etruscan origins which appeared in<br />
BABesch 79 (2004) 51-7, <strong>the</strong> Etruscologist Bauke van der<br />
Meer speaks out in favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orientalist <strong>the</strong>sis, but he<br />
does not choose between <strong>the</strong> two variant models <strong>of</strong> colonization<br />
as presented here, viz. at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bronze Age<br />
or during an advanced stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Early Iron Age: in fact,<br />
he posits three waves <strong>of</strong> colonization in sum, namely one<br />
c. 1100 BC, a second c. 900 BC, and <strong>the</strong> third c. 700 BC<br />
(p. 55).