The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evans CHIC LH value attestation 1. 2 001 1 AMU # 310 2. – – 10 H ARMAH I, [®ar] # 332, 623 # 333 3a. 73 018 13 PÁRA # 255, # 296, # 314, #332 3b. 14 PÁRANA # 271 4. – – 15 mi 4 # 333 5. 3 002 624 19 á # 332, # 333 6. 16 007 625 29 tá # 296, # 314 7. 7 006 31 H ISH IA, [®i] # 246, # 333 8. 58 040 35 na # 309, # 333 626 9. 10 095 41 tà # 332 10. – – 56-7 KATA, kà # 333 11. 9 009 66 PIA, pi # 003, # 139 12. 27 057 80-1 SARU PF 7 (8x), # 333 13. 11 010 82 ta 6 PF 5 (41x), # 258 14. – – 85 l(a) # 332 15. – – 90 TIWA, ti # 333 16. – – 97 WALWA, ú # 333 17. 65 016 101 TARKU # 193, # 271, # 310 18. 99 028 102-3 KURUNT, rú 627 # 255, # 296 19. 63 011 104 sà # 271 20. 62 012 107 MUWA, mu # 253, # 271 21. – – 108 SURNA, sú # 333 22. 64 013 109 MALIA, ma 6 # 139, # 312 23. 67 – 110 ma # 333 24. – – 111 H AWA, ®a 4 # 328 25. 77 – 125 lí # 333 26. 82 – 128 TINTAPU, ti 5 # 314, # 333 27. 80 – 130-3 ARA, ra LF (7x), # 333 28. 59 – 138 [wa] # 333 29. 92 031 153 nú PF 5 (25x), PF 6 (11x) 30. – – 160 WIANA, wi # 333 31. – – 167 [PARNA, pa] # 333 32. 96 – 175 LALA, la # 271 628 33. – – 181 TURPI, [tu] # 333 34. – – 189 WASU, [wa 1] # 333 35. – – 190 sol suus # 333 623 Note that the sign is rendered in this text “en face” instead of “en profile” as is usually the case. 624 Note that both Evans and CHIC present only the xoanon sign, not the man’s head itself. 625 Note that this particular form of the arm sign is represented without the dagger, as it occurs in # 314. 626 Note that the ship sign appears both with and without a mast as well as in form of an hippocamp. 627 Value attested already for seals or sealings from the Late Bronze Age period, see Herbordt 1998: 313; 317, fig. 4, 3-4. 628 Note that the sign is rendered here in a lengthened and extremely slim way so that it is almost not recognizable anymore as a tongue, but the three knobs on the top side are decisive for its identification. 124
36. 5 005 191 TIWATA, [ti] PF 2 (35x), PF 3 (4x) 37. – – 199 TARH UNT, ®à # 333 38. 115 061/069 212 H APA, ná # 196, # 333 39. – – 223 s 6 # 333 40. 114 034 228 UTNA, tu 5 PF 7 (10x), # 333 41. 41 041 267 WANA, [wa 6] # 246, # 271, # 309 42. – 032 268 scalprum # 328 43. 17 – 278 li # 333 44. 12 043 283-4 custos # 314, # 333 Evans CHIC LH value attestation 45. 300 gens # 277 46. 15 051 312-3 ZITI, zi # 328 47. 24 056 327 SASA, sa 5 PF 7 (10x), # 193, # 255, # 328 48. – – 369 vita (= Cretan knot), cf. Bossert 1932: 12-3 49. – – 370 ASU, as, su # 333 50. 14 050 383, 1 (determ. of PN) # 310, # 314, # 333 51. – – 383, 2 [+ta/i], +ra/i # 332, # 333 52. 122 077 415 sa # 003, # 139 53. – – 419 mà, mì LF (1x) 54. 138 – 438 magistratus # 193 55. – – 451 ®ur # 271 56. 19 036 488 ta 5 PF 6 (17x), # 255 Table 4. Correspondences between Cretan hieroglyphic and Luwian hieroglyphic (values in square brackets attested for Cretan hieroglyphic only). Evans CHIC Eg. value attestation 1. 2 001 A 1 AMU # 310 12. 27 057 A 21 SARU PF 7 (8x) 13. 11 010 D 56 ta 6 PF 5 (41x) 57. 85-6 020-1 L 2 bi’ty # 003, # 018, # 039, # 139, # 310 58. – – M 23 nswt # 018, # 039 59. 116 *156 M 43 WAINU, wa # 274, # 314 60. 109 – N 5 sol # 310 40. 114 034 N 26 UTNA, tu 5 PF 7 (10x), # 333 41. 41 041 O 11 WANA, wa 6 # 246, # 271, # 309 48. – – S 34 vita (= Cretan knot) 61. 21 046 U 21 t PF 4 (7x) 62. 18 044 X 8 pi (< PIA) PF 1 (72x), PF 2 (35x), PF 3 (4x), PF 4 (7x), # 255 63. 31 076 Y 3 TUPA, du # 312 35. – – – sol suus # 333 Table 5. Correspondences between Cretan hieroglyphic and Egyptian hieroglyphic (values as attested for Cretan hieroglyphic). 125
Page 1:
The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples 1
Page 4 and 5:
Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof.dr
Page 7:
CONTENTS Preface ..................
Page 10 and 11:
profited from the collaboration wit
Page 12 and 13:
Frontispiece. Rowers depicted on a
Page 15 and 16:
In a work which deals with the ethn
Page 17 and 18:
similar vein, to accuse Georges Dum
Page 19:
upon a pre-existing local populatio
Page 22 and 23:
certainty about the 8th century BC
Page 24 and 25:
with the Heraklids Kresphontes and
Page 26 and 27:
after the end of the Bronze Age. 43
Page 28 and 29:
Miletos may be due to an historical
Page 30 and 31:
It lies at hand to correlate the fa
Page 32 and 33:
more, he rearranged the western pro
Page 35 and 36:
4. AN HISTORIOGRAPHIC OUTLINE In th
Page 37 and 38:
The view of Maspero that the Sea Pe
Page 39 and 40:
ples as mere pirates goes Helck’s
Page 41 and 42:
site or manoeuvring in mountainous
Page 43 and 44:
The contemporary sources with a bea
Page 45 and 46:
Enkomi cylinder seal (Inv. no. 19.1
Page 47 and 48:
Tablet 1687 from Enkomi Side A (15)
Page 49 and 50:
RS 20.238 ù dú-nu-na-ta dan-níš
Page 51 and 52:
Libyans (year 5) as well as success
Page 53 and 54:
Fig. 5. Land battle scene of Medine
Page 55 and 56:
he said to me: “To be sure, they
Page 57 and 58:
6. LUKKA AND THE LUKKA LANDS Since
Page 59 and 60:
7. ETHNOGENESIS OF THE GREEKS The d
Page 61 and 62:
the archaeological record by the Ma
Page 63 and 64:
adopting the then modern Indo-Aryan
Page 65 and 66:
Evidently, the Hyksos were a highly
Page 67:
linguistic features from an hypothe
Page 70 and 71:
have been Crete, since in the text
Page 72 and 73:
war 199 - a suggestion further emph
Page 74 and 75: give and take a few dialectal reshu
Page 77 and 78: In Homeros there are three indicati
Page 79 and 80: Models The problem of Etruscan orig
Page 81 and 82: 7th century BC, is, considering the
Page 83 and 84: (proto-)Villanovan is attested (cf.
Page 85 and 86: sumed that the Etruscans have borro
Page 87: grave of North Pontic steppe type,
Page 90 and 91: Trojans, nor will they change their
Page 92 and 93: “Venel Atelinas has given this to
Page 94 and 95: as follows: 370 1. M(arce) Vnata
Page 96 and 97: Fig. 17. Settlement of the Sea Peop
Page 98 and 99: salian Gyrtone. 406 On the basis of
Page 100 and 101: of their foundation of Kume, the Ai
Page 102 and 103: Asherah, Ugaritic y-, -m)!”. 453
Page 104 and 105: inhabitants of the Mesara plain at
Page 106 and 107: sociated from that of Mls, a predec
Page 108 and 109: found here. 513 It is interesting t
Page 110 and 111: Fig. 21. Distribution of Trojan gre
Page 112 and 113: The story continues with the Sherde
Page 114 and 115: On the basis of the combined eviden
Page 116 and 117: our identification of the Weshesh w
Page 118 and 119: (Histories I, 57) reports, adopted
Page 120 and 121: lesh are geographically based, bein
Page 123: APPENDIX I: ON THE DECIPHERMENT OF
Page 127 and 128: Evans CHIC CL value attestation 64.
Page 129 and 130: identical to Egyptian bi’ty “ki
Page 131 and 132: # 258 # 271 # 296 # 309 1 2 3 1. 'y
Page 133: # 314 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. 'tá-PÁRA
Page 136 and 137: 52. “-ship” -®i- -c-, -- (pro)
Page 138 and 139: 59. 3rd pers. pl. pres./fut. -nt -n
Page 140 and 141: pattern is formed by the G pl. in -
Page 142 and 143: LUWIAN ROMAN INDIC GERMANIC F1 Tark
Page 144 and 145: linguistic point of view, however,
Page 146 and 147: meat) or as a sacred animal per se:
Page 148 and 149: Behn, Friedrich, 1924, Hausurnen. B
Page 150 and 151: tury B.C’. Orientalia 56. Pp. 1-3
Page 152 and 153: Gardiner, Alan H., 1947, Ancient Eg
Page 154 and 155: Ägäis und die Levante während de
Page 156 and 157: terranean in the mid second millenn
Page 158 and 159: occidentale. Studia Mediterranea 8.
Page 160 and 161: Sommer, Ferdinand, 1932, Die A®®i
Page 162 and 163: --- , 2004b, Woudhuizen, Fred C., S
Page 164 and 165: hele andere etnische groep rekenen.
Page 167: CURRICULUM VITAE VAN FREDERIK CHRIS
show all

The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?