03.06.2013 Views

The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mesara plain at <strong>the</strong> time!<br />

To recapitulate our evidence on <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Pelasgians, we have experienced <strong>the</strong> following. First, at <strong>the</strong><br />

time that <strong>the</strong> Pelagians formed part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earliest recorded<br />

inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Greece, <strong>the</strong>y probably spoke a Thraco-<br />

Phrygian language. Second, when – driven out by <strong>the</strong><br />

Greeks – <strong>the</strong>y migrated to western Anatolia, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians<br />

adapted to <strong>the</strong> local language and went over to speak a<br />

Luwian vernacular, which, however, still bore testimony <strong>of</strong><br />

a long history with (pre-)Greek. Third, those Pelasgians<br />

which went to <strong>the</strong> Mesara plain in Crete likewise adapted<br />

to <strong>the</strong> local linguistic situation, using Luwian as <strong>the</strong>ir primary<br />

language and Semitic in religious and <strong>of</strong>ficial matters<br />

in order to keep up with <strong>the</strong> international standards at <strong>the</strong><br />

time. Evidently, <strong>the</strong> migrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians were not<br />

massive enough to alter <strong>the</strong> existing linguistic situation in<br />

<strong>the</strong> new homeland. <strong>The</strong> latter conclusion ties in with <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians in western Anatolia were not so<br />

important as to enter into <strong>the</strong> Hittite records as a distinct<br />

population group. As a closing remark to this section, it<br />

may be <strong>of</strong> interest to note that all three linguistic layers<br />

discussed are demonstrable for <strong>the</strong> Philistines in <strong>the</strong>ir new<br />

home in <strong>the</strong> Levant: Thraco-Phrygian in <strong>the</strong> place name<br />

Ekron, which bears witness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PIE root *akr- or *aker-<br />

“high”, Luwian in <strong>the</strong> personal name Goliath, which recalls<br />

Lydian names <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type Alyattes, Sadyattes, etc., 475<br />

and Semitic in <strong>the</strong> divine name ’šrt “Asherah (with Phoenician<br />

feminine ending -t)” as recorded for Ekron. 476 As it<br />

seems, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgian ancestors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philistines preserved<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir ethnic identity during <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Mycenaean koin (c. 1350-1200 BC)!<br />

Additional note 1: Pelasgians in Italy<br />

Pelasgian population groups are not only recorded for <strong>the</strong><br />

Aegean, but also for Italy. 477 Of <strong>the</strong> latter, it is absolutely<br />

clear that <strong>the</strong>y ultimately originated from <strong>the</strong> Aegean, and<br />

hence bear testimony <strong>of</strong> migration from east to west. When<br />

did such a migration take place? In order to answer this<br />

475 Pauly-Wissowa Realencyclopädie, s.v. Philister; Dothan 1982:<br />

22; Machinist 2000: 63-4; Indo-European more in general is <strong>the</strong><br />

genitive in -š as recorded for <strong>the</strong> patronyms in a Philistine inscription<br />

from Tell Gemme, dated to <strong>the</strong> 7th century BC, see Garbini<br />

1997: 244.<br />

476 Gitin 1993: 250-2, with note 37; cf. Merlo 1998.<br />

477 For an overview, see Briquel 1984.<br />

104<br />

question it is relevant to note that Pelasgians colonizing <strong>the</strong><br />

north <strong>of</strong> Italy were confronted with Umbrians, 478 whereas<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir colleagues preferring <strong>the</strong> south had to drive out<br />

Auronissi (= variant form <strong>of</strong> Aurunci, a Latin indication <strong>of</strong><br />

Oscans). 479 Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> migration in question can<br />

only be situated after <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Urnfield ancestors<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oscans and Umbrians in Italy at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Bronze Age (see section 10), which means in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Early Iron Age. In sou<strong>the</strong>rn Etruria and Latium, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians<br />

are reported to have stumbled upon Sicels, 480<br />

which is more problematic to situate in <strong>the</strong> Early Iron Age,<br />

because <strong>the</strong> latter were already kicked out <strong>of</strong> this environment<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Umbrians and <strong>the</strong> Opicans (= Greek indication<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oscans) apparently at <strong>the</strong> turn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bronze Age to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Early Iron Age. 481 <strong>The</strong>ir presence in central Italy at <strong>the</strong><br />

arrival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians may <strong>the</strong>refore well be due to an<br />

anachronism <strong>of</strong> our source, Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos,<br />

basing himself on antiquarian relics. 482<br />

As we have seen in <strong>the</strong> above, <strong>the</strong>re is reason to believe<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians in <strong>the</strong> Aegean region are actually<br />

identical with <strong>the</strong> Tyrrhenians recorded for <strong>the</strong> same area.<br />

This identification by and large holds good for <strong>the</strong>ir kinsmen<br />

in Italy as well, but not in every case. Thus, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgian<br />

presence at Caere is clearly distinct from <strong>the</strong><br />

subsequent one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tyrrhenians, identified as Lydians.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians, <strong>the</strong> site is called Agylla.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> Lydians attacked <strong>the</strong> site, so <strong>the</strong> story goes, one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m asked how it is called. A Pelasgian, not understanding<br />

<strong>the</strong> question, saluted him in Greek: khaire. As a<br />

consequence, <strong>the</strong> Lydians believed <strong>the</strong> site to be called like<br />

478 Justinus, Epitoma historiarum philippicarum Pompei Trogi<br />

XX, 1, 11 (Spina); Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities<br />

I, 20, 4 (Cortona); II, 49, 1 (ager Reatinus).<br />

479 Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnasso, Roman Antiquities I, 21, 3.<br />

480 Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities I, 20, 4-5; cf.<br />

Briquel 1984: 175, note 31 (Caere); 298-9 (Pisa, Saturnia, Alsium);<br />

Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities I, 21; cf.<br />

Briquel 1984: 351-2 (ager Faliscus); Briquel 1984: 361, note 14<br />

(various locations in Latium).<br />

481 Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities I, 22, 4-5.<br />

482 Cf. Briquel 1984: 300-1. Note in this connection <strong>the</strong> Sicel nature<br />

ascribed to Saturnus at Cutiliae in <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> an oracle once<br />

given to <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians about <strong>the</strong>ir future homeland and recorded<br />

on a tripod from <strong>the</strong>ir sanctuary at Dodona (Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos,<br />

Roman Antiquities I, 19), whereas, as we have seen in note<br />

478 above, <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ager Reatinus, to which Cutiliae<br />

belongs, in effect consisted <strong>of</strong> Umbrians at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> its actual<br />

colonization by Pelasgians.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!