The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mesara plain at <strong>the</strong> time!<br />
To recapitulate our evidence on <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Pelasgians, we have experienced <strong>the</strong> following. First, at <strong>the</strong><br />
time that <strong>the</strong> Pelagians formed part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earliest recorded<br />
inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Greece, <strong>the</strong>y probably spoke a Thraco-<br />
Phrygian language. Second, when – driven out by <strong>the</strong><br />
Greeks – <strong>the</strong>y migrated to western Anatolia, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians<br />
adapted to <strong>the</strong> local language and went over to speak a<br />
Luwian vernacular, which, however, still bore testimony <strong>of</strong><br />
a long history with (pre-)Greek. Third, those Pelasgians<br />
which went to <strong>the</strong> Mesara plain in Crete likewise adapted<br />
to <strong>the</strong> local linguistic situation, using Luwian as <strong>the</strong>ir primary<br />
language and Semitic in religious and <strong>of</strong>ficial matters<br />
in order to keep up with <strong>the</strong> international standards at <strong>the</strong><br />
time. Evidently, <strong>the</strong> migrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians were not<br />
massive enough to alter <strong>the</strong> existing linguistic situation in<br />
<strong>the</strong> new homeland. <strong>The</strong> latter conclusion ties in with <strong>the</strong><br />
fact that <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians in western Anatolia were not so<br />
important as to enter into <strong>the</strong> Hittite records as a distinct<br />
population group. As a closing remark to this section, it<br />
may be <strong>of</strong> interest to note that all three linguistic layers<br />
discussed are demonstrable for <strong>the</strong> Philistines in <strong>the</strong>ir new<br />
home in <strong>the</strong> Levant: Thraco-Phrygian in <strong>the</strong> place name<br />
Ekron, which bears witness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PIE root *akr- or *aker-<br />
“high”, Luwian in <strong>the</strong> personal name Goliath, which recalls<br />
Lydian names <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type Alyattes, Sadyattes, etc., 475<br />
and Semitic in <strong>the</strong> divine name ’šrt “Asherah (with Phoenician<br />
feminine ending -t)” as recorded for Ekron. 476 As it<br />
seems, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgian ancestors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philistines preserved<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir ethnic identity during <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Mycenaean koin (c. 1350-1200 BC)!<br />
Additional note 1: Pelasgians in Italy<br />
Pelasgian population groups are not only recorded for <strong>the</strong><br />
Aegean, but also for Italy. 477 Of <strong>the</strong> latter, it is absolutely<br />
clear that <strong>the</strong>y ultimately originated from <strong>the</strong> Aegean, and<br />
hence bear testimony <strong>of</strong> migration from east to west. When<br />
did such a migration take place? In order to answer this<br />
475 Pauly-Wissowa Realencyclopädie, s.v. Philister; Dothan 1982:<br />
22; Machinist 2000: 63-4; Indo-European more in general is <strong>the</strong><br />
genitive in -š as recorded for <strong>the</strong> patronyms in a Philistine inscription<br />
from Tell Gemme, dated to <strong>the</strong> 7th century BC, see Garbini<br />
1997: 244.<br />
476 Gitin 1993: 250-2, with note 37; cf. Merlo 1998.<br />
477 For an overview, see Briquel 1984.<br />
104<br />
question it is relevant to note that Pelasgians colonizing <strong>the</strong><br />
north <strong>of</strong> Italy were confronted with Umbrians, 478 whereas<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir colleagues preferring <strong>the</strong> south had to drive out<br />
Auronissi (= variant form <strong>of</strong> Aurunci, a Latin indication <strong>of</strong><br />
Oscans). 479 Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> migration in question can<br />
only be situated after <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Urnfield ancestors<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oscans and Umbrians in Italy at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Bronze Age (see section 10), which means in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Early Iron Age. In sou<strong>the</strong>rn Etruria and Latium, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians<br />
are reported to have stumbled upon Sicels, 480<br />
which is more problematic to situate in <strong>the</strong> Early Iron Age,<br />
because <strong>the</strong> latter were already kicked out <strong>of</strong> this environment<br />
by <strong>the</strong> Umbrians and <strong>the</strong> Opicans (= Greek indication<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oscans) apparently at <strong>the</strong> turn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bronze Age to<br />
<strong>the</strong> Early Iron Age. 481 <strong>The</strong>ir presence in central Italy at <strong>the</strong><br />
arrival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians may <strong>the</strong>refore well be due to an<br />
anachronism <strong>of</strong> our source, Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos,<br />
basing himself on antiquarian relics. 482<br />
As we have seen in <strong>the</strong> above, <strong>the</strong>re is reason to believe<br />
that <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians in <strong>the</strong> Aegean region are actually<br />
identical with <strong>the</strong> Tyrrhenians recorded for <strong>the</strong> same area.<br />
This identification by and large holds good for <strong>the</strong>ir kinsmen<br />
in Italy as well, but not in every case. Thus, <strong>the</strong> Pelasgian<br />
presence at Caere is clearly distinct from <strong>the</strong><br />
subsequent one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tyrrhenians, identified as Lydians.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians, <strong>the</strong> site is called Agylla.<br />
When <strong>the</strong> Lydians attacked <strong>the</strong> site, so <strong>the</strong> story goes, one<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m asked how it is called. A Pelasgian, not understanding<br />
<strong>the</strong> question, saluted him in Greek: khaire. As a<br />
consequence, <strong>the</strong> Lydians believed <strong>the</strong> site to be called like<br />
478 Justinus, Epitoma historiarum philippicarum Pompei Trogi<br />
XX, 1, 11 (Spina); Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities<br />
I, 20, 4 (Cortona); II, 49, 1 (ager Reatinus).<br />
479 Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnasso, Roman Antiquities I, 21, 3.<br />
480 Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities I, 20, 4-5; cf.<br />
Briquel 1984: 175, note 31 (Caere); 298-9 (Pisa, Saturnia, Alsium);<br />
Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities I, 21; cf.<br />
Briquel 1984: 351-2 (ager Faliscus); Briquel 1984: 361, note 14<br />
(various locations in Latium).<br />
481 Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos, Roman Antiquities I, 22, 4-5.<br />
482 Cf. Briquel 1984: 300-1. Note in this connection <strong>the</strong> Sicel nature<br />
ascribed to Saturnus at Cutiliae in <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> an oracle once<br />
given to <strong>the</strong> Pelasgians about <strong>the</strong>ir future homeland and recorded<br />
on a tripod from <strong>the</strong>ir sanctuary at Dodona (Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halikarnassos,<br />
Roman Antiquities I, 19), whereas, as we have seen in note<br />
478 above, <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ager Reatinus, to which Cutiliae<br />
belongs, in effect consisted <strong>of</strong> Umbrians at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> its actual<br />
colonization by Pelasgians.