eq-ees-teacher-evaluation
eq-ees-teacher-evaluation eq-ees-teacher-evaluation
General Observation Feedback Form Teacher: Date: Indicator #1 Indicator #2 Indicator #3 Teacher Practice Strategies Select those that apply Lecture Classroom Discussion Cooperative Learning Group Work Guided Practice Learning Centers Hands On/Active Learning Presentations Question/Answer Independent Student Work Peer Evaluation Advanced/Graphic Organizers Nonlinguistic Representations Project Based Learning Similarities/Differences Summarizing/Note Taking Student Engagement High Moderate Low Disengaged Comments on Indicators Observed Comments/Observations on Teacher Practice Strategies Depth of Knowledge Extended Thinking Strategic Thinking Skill Concept Recall Overall Comments/ Observations Teacher’s Signature/Date Observer’s Signature/Date Signatures indicate the document has been reviewed and discussed. MISSOURI'S EDUCATOR EVALUATION SYSTEM Classroom Structure Evidence of Student Work Yes No Room Organized Yes No Curriculum/Instruction Taught curriculum matches written curriculum Yes No Objectives & DOK Align Yes No Accessible Materials Yes No Clear Learning Targets Yes No Technology Integrated Yes No Learning Assessments Observations Question/Answer Quiz or Test Group Response Individual Response Conferencing Observation None Learning Environment Conducive to Learning Somewhat Conducive Not Conducive Disruptive Behavior Off Task Behavior Lack of Organization
Summative Evaluation Form Missouri’s Educator Evaluation systEM
- Page 43 and 44: Standard 2: Student Learning, Growt
- Page 45 and 46: Standard 2: Student Learning, Growt
- Page 47 and 48: Standard 2: Student Learning, Growt
- Page 49 and 50: Standard 3: Curriculum Implementati
- Page 51 and 52: Standard 3: Curriculum Implementati
- Page 53 and 54: Standard 4: Critical Thinking Teach
- Page 55 and 56: Standard 4: Critical Thinking Possi
- Page 57 and 58: Standard 5: Positive Classroom Envi
- Page 59 and 60: Standard 5: Positive Classroom Envi
- Page 61 and 62: Standard 6: Effective Communication
- Page 63 and 64: Standard 6: Effective Communication
- Page 65 and 66: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 67 and 68: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 69 and 70: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 71 and 72: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 73 and 74: Standard 8: Professionalism Quality
- Page 75 and 76: Standard 8: Professionalism Possibl
- Page 77 and 78: Standard 9: Professional Collaborat
- Page 79 and 80: Standard 9: Professional Collaborat
- Page 81 and 82: Sample Student Survey Questions (fo
- Page 83 and 84: Sample Survey Question Alignment Mi
- Page 85 and 86: 8. My child’s teacher regularly g
- Page 87 and 88: Growth Plan Missouri’s Educator E
- Page 89 and 90: Professional Growth Plan for Identi
- Page 91 and 92: Improvement Plan for: Identify Indi
- Page 93: Missouri's educator evaluation syst
- Page 97 and 98: Standard 8: Self-Assessment and Imp
- Page 99 and 100: New Teacher Feedback Forms Missouri
- Page 101 and 102: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - Augus
- Page 103 and 104: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - Novem
- Page 105 and 106: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - Febru
- Page 107 and 108: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - June
- Page 109 and 110: 2 nd Year Teacher Practices - Augus
- Page 111 and 112: 2 nd Year Teacher Practices - Novem
- Page 113 and 114: 2 nd Year Teacher Practices - Febru
- Page 115 and 116: 2 nd Year Teacher Practices - June
- Page 117 and 118: Research and Proven Practices Misso
- Page 119 and 120: Links to Research and Resources Mis
- Page 121 and 122: Introduction to the Literature Revi
- Page 123 and 124: MO Standard Evaluative Criteria for
- Page 125 and 126: feedback, and engage students in di
- Page 127 and 128: 1.4 Teacher makes interdisciplinary
- Page 129 and 130: Rothstein, P. (1990). Educational p
- Page 131 and 132: & Brown, 2005; Tieso, 2003; Tomlins
- Page 133 and 134: Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence re
- Page 135 and 136: Danielson (1996, 2007) asserts that
- Page 137 and 138: 0.61) on student achievement. Accor
- Page 139 and 140: Available from http://merc.soe.vcu.
- Page 141 and 142: deviations higher than the achievem
- Page 143 and 144: Several other studies have demonstr
Summative Evaluation<br />
Form<br />
Missouri’s Educator Evaluation systEM
Change language