eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

Growth Opportunity – checking this box for a standard might possibly result in an indicator from this standard being
selected in the teacher’s second year as an opportunity for growth and documented in the next year’s Educator Growth
Plan
Meets Expectation – checking this box for a standard indicates that performance in this area meets the expecation of
the administrator/district at the present time
o Note: the comment box provided below each standard provides opportunity to offer the rationale for the rating as well as to
note exemplary performance in this particular area.
The second page of the Summative Evaluation Form provides an overall rating for the new teacher. This section is completed as follows:
1. Years in Position – determine if this is the first or second year the teacher has been in the current evaluated position (Note: the purpose for
“in position” is to allow for reassignment of teachers to different grade levels/positions without adversly affecting performance ratings)
2. Select one of the effectiveness ratings based on the following criteria:
a. Ineffective Rating
i. Multiple areas of concern across the 9 standards, OR
ii. An average of the follow-up assessment scores on the selected indicators falls into the indicated range
b. Minimally Effective Rating
i. 1 area of concern across the 9 standards, OR
ii. An average of the follow-up assessment scores on the selected indicators falls into the indicated range
c. Effective Rating
i. No areas of concern across the 9 standards, AND
ii. An average of the follow-up assessment scores on the selected indicators falls into the indicated range
d. Highly Effective Rating
i. No areas of concern across the 9 standards, AND
ii. An average of the follow-up assessment scores on the selected indicators falls into the indicated range
e. Complete the comments section and the recommendation for employment
Missouri's educator evaluation system Page 32