eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

eq-ees-teacher-evaluation eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

march4teachers
from march4teachers More from this publisher
03.06.2013 Views

The second year of teaching is organized in similar fashion. The timeframes on this table begin with the summer prior to the second year of teaching and extend through to the summer following the second year of teaching. This encompasses all of the required two years of mentoring that is to be provided to all new teachers. Each table contains 8 separate timeframes. Each timeframe contains anywhere between 2 to 7 Quality Indicators as the particular focus during the indicated timeframe. In this way, new teachers are focusing on a defined set up performances within each specified timeframe. The selected indicators are suggested based on ordinary events that occur in a typical school year. There is flexibility to substitute indicators based on the unique characteristics of a particular district and/or school. What is most important is ensuring that baseline data on performance is collected on the new teacher; that the new teacher receives feedback on their performance from both the mentor and administrator; and that this occurs without being an overwhelming process. Missouri's educator evaluation system Page 29

New Teacher Feedback and Evaluation Forms There are a series of new teacher feedback forms. These forms are aligned to the 8 timeframes that occur each year and collectively create the process for gathering baseline data on the new teacher’s performance. Each form specifically lists the quality indicators for the specified timeframe. Each indicator includes bulleted statements referencing the particular knowledge and/or skill to be demonstrated. There is opportunity to provide comments for each of the listed indicators. A 0 – 7 rating scale is also provided for each indicator. The rating scale and a full description of the performance it references are provided on each specific growth guide for each quality indicator. An overall determination on performance uses baseline and follow-up scores, feedback generated throughout the year on selected indicators, general feedback generated periodically through classroom observations and any other data or information relevant to the teacher’s performance observed or gathered throughout the year. This information is captured on feedback forms. This information and data is used to complete Summative Evaluation Form. Missouri's educator evaluation system Page 30

The second year of teaching is organized in<br />

similar fashion. The timeframes on this table<br />

begin with the summer prior to the second year<br />

of teaching and extend through to the summer<br />

following the second year of teaching. This<br />

encompasses all of the r<strong>eq</strong>uired two years of<br />

mentoring that is to be provided to all new<br />

<strong>teacher</strong>s.<br />

Each table contains 8 separate timeframes. Each<br />

timeframe contains anywhere between 2 to 7<br />

Quality Indicators as the particular focus during<br />

the indicated timeframe. In this way, new<br />

<strong>teacher</strong>s are focusing on a defined set up<br />

performances within each specified timeframe.<br />

The selected indicators are suggested based on<br />

ordinary events that occur in a typical school<br />

year. There is flexibility to substitute indicators<br />

based on the unique characteristics of a<br />

particular district and/or school. What is most<br />

important is ensuring that baseline data on<br />

performance is collected on the new <strong>teacher</strong>;<br />

that the new <strong>teacher</strong> receives feedback on their<br />

performance from both the mentor and<br />

administrator; and that this occurs without being<br />

an overwhelming process.<br />

Missouri's educator <strong>evaluation</strong> system Page 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!