eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

The first 1 ½ pages of the summative evaluation form provides both an overview of the effectiveness of the teacher looking across all nine
standards as well as a focused view in regards to the specific indicators the teacher has worked on throughout the year.
Assessing the teacher’s performance across all teaching standards
o Each standard is listed with summary statements. The statements represent a very broad description drawn from the categories
of commitment, practice and impact. They are listed as a type of checklist supporting each of 9 standards. For each standard,
three options are provided:
Area of Concern – checking this box for a standard will likely result in an improvement plan for this standard meaning
that growth in this area is both necessary and required for continued employment
Growth Opportunity – checking this box for a standard might possibly result in an indicator from this standard being
selected in the following year as an opportunity for growth and documented in the next year’s Educator Growth Plan
Meets Expectation – checking this box for this standard indicates that performance in this area meets the expecation of
the administrator/district at the present time
o Note: the comment box provided below each standard provides opportunity to offer the rationale for the rating as well as to
note exemplary performance in this particular area.
Assessing the teacher’s performance on selected indicators
o This section of the summative evaluation form focuses on the growth opportunities presented through the selected indicators.
Summative information is provided in the following areas:
Indicator and Rationale – document the specific indicator(s) that were selected and the reason this was a growth
opportunity for the teacher
Baseline Assessment – indicate the initial rating achieved for each selected indicator
Goal – summarize the goal that was created to address the growth opportunity
Results – describe the outcomes of implementing the strategy and determine whether the focus was adequately
addressed
Follow-Up Assessment – indicate the follow-up rating achieved for each selected indicator
o Note: This information is transferred from the Educator Growth Plan
Missouri's educator evaluation system Page 20