eq-ees-teacher-evaluation
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

eq-ees-teacher-evaluation eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

march4teachers
from march4teachers More from this publisher
03.06.2013 Views

Marshall, K. (2009). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation: How to work smart, build collaboration, and close the achievement gap. Jossey-Bass. http://www.josseybass.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470449969.html Marshall, K. (2010, September 4). Teacher evaluation rubrics. Retrieved June 2012, from http://www.marshallmemo.com/articles/%20KM%20Teacher%20Eval%20Rubrics%20Sept%202 010.pdf Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). http://shop.ascd.org/Default.aspx?TabID=55&ProductId=790 McClellan, C. (2012, February 5). Teacher evaluator training & certification: Lessons learned from the measures of effective teaching project. The Danielson Group. http://www.danielsongroup.org/article.aspx?type=news&page=METLessons Waters, T., Marzano, J. & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. McREL. http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/ASC/5031RR_BalancedLeadership.pdf Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) Project. (2010, December). Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the measures of effective teaching project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. http://www.metproject.org/downloads/Preliminary_Finding-Policy_Brief.pdf The New Teacher Project. (2010). Teacher evaluation 2.0. http://tntp.org/assets/documents/Teacher-Evaluation-Oct10F.pdf?files/Teacher-Evaluation- Oct10F.pdf The New Teacher Project. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. http://widgeteffect.org/downloads/TheWidgetEffect.pdf The following references mentoring support and services in Missouri. Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2008, May). Missouri mentoring program standards. Retrieved June 2012, from http://www.dese.mo.gov/divteachqual/leadership/documents/mentoringstandards.pdf Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (n.d.) Administrator mentoring program. Retrieved June 2012, from http://www.dese.mo.gov/divteachqual/leadership/mentor_prog/index.html Missouri's educator evaluation systeM

Introduction to the Literature Review of the Missouri Teacher Professional Practice Standards This review of the literature that supports the Missouri Standards and Quality Indicators was conducted by RMC Research Corporation (http://www.rmcresearchcorporation.com/). The review provides a brief summary of high-quality evidence in support of each of the specific performance elements that comprise Missouri’s Teacher Standards and Quality Indicators. The review includes summaries of pertinent research, references for those who would like to read more about the actual studies, additional resources, and related research. The review can serve as source of professional development to assist teachers in their focus and growth on particular indicators. Included in this review are references for the following standards and quality indicators: Standard 1: Content Knowledge, including varied perspectives, aligned with appropriate instruction Quality Indicator 1 – Teacher delivers content knowledge and increases academic language Quality Indicator 2 – Teacher engages students in subject matter Quality Indicator 3 – Teacher engages students in methods of inquiry and research Quality Indicator 4 – Teacher makes interdisciplinary content connections Quality Indicator 5 – Teacher incorporates global and real world learning activities Standard 2: Student Learning, Growth and Development Quality Indicator 1 – Teacher uses developmental factors and theories to guide instruction Quality Indicator 2 – Teacher encourages student responsibility for their own learning Quality Indicator 3 – Teacher applies theories of learning to differentiate instruction Quality Indicator 4 – Teacher respects and values each student’s learning needs Quality Indicator 5 – Teacher designs lessons based on prior experiences, learning styles, multiple intelligences, strengths and needs Quality Indicator 6 – Teacher designs instruction with considerations for language, culture and family and community values Standard 3: Curriculum Implementation Quality Indicator 1 – Teacher designs learning experiences that align to curriculum standards Quality Indicator 2 – Teacher uses lessons and activities to meet the diverse needs of learners Quality Indicator 3 – Teacher evaluates lessons relative to long and short-term learning goals Standard 4: Critical Thinking Quality Indicator 1 – Teacher promotes critical thinking and problem-solving skills Quality Indicator 2 – Teacher uses a variety of instructional resources to enhance student learning Quality Indicator 3 – Teacher employs individual and collaborative learning strategies Missouri's educator evaluation systeM

Marshall, K. (2009). Rethinking <strong>teacher</strong> supervision and <strong>evaluation</strong>: How to work smart, build<br />

collaboration, and close the achievement gap. Jossey-Bass.<br />

http://www.josseybass.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470449969.html<br />

Marshall, K. (2010, September 4). Teacher <strong>evaluation</strong> rubrics. Retrieved June 2012, from<br />

http://www.marshallmemo.com/articles/%20KM%20Teacher%20Eval%20Rubrics%20Sept%202<br />

010.pdf<br />

Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective<br />

instruction. Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development<br />

(ASCD).<br />

http://shop.ascd.org/Default.aspx?TabID=55&ProductId=790<br />

McClellan, C. (2012, February 5). Teacher evaluator training & certification: Lessons learned from the<br />

measures of effective teaching project. The Danielson Group.<br />

http://www.danielsongroup.org/article.aspx?type=news&page=METLessons<br />

Waters, T., Marzano, J. & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us<br />

about the effect of leadership on student achievement. McREL.<br />

http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/ASC/5031RR_BalancedLeadership.pdf<br />

Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) Project. (2010, December). Learning about teaching: Initial<br />

findings from the measures of effective teaching project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.<br />

http://www.metproject.org/downloads/Preliminary_Finding-Policy_Brief.pdf<br />

The New Teacher Project. (2010). Teacher <strong>evaluation</strong> 2.0.<br />

http://tntp.org/assets/documents/Teacher-Evaluation-Oct10F.pdf?files/Teacher-Evaluation-<br />

Oct10F.pdf<br />

The New Teacher Project. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on<br />

differences in <strong>teacher</strong> effectiveness.<br />

http://widgeteffect.org/downloads/TheWidgetEffect.pdf<br />

The following references mentoring support and services in Missouri.<br />

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2008, May). Missouri mentoring<br />

program standards. Retrieved June 2012, from<br />

http://www.dese.mo.gov/divteachqual/leadership/documents/mentoringstandards.pdf<br />

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (n.d.) Administrator mentoring program.<br />

Retrieved June 2012, from<br />

http://www.dese.mo.gov/divteachqual/leadership/mentor_prog/index.html<br />

Missouri's educator <strong>evaluation</strong> systeM

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!