03.06.2013 Views

eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

eq-ees-teacher-evaluation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Also provided is a document called the Possible<br />

Sources of Evidence. There is a single page document<br />

provided for each standard. This document provides a<br />

list of “possible” sources of evidence that a <strong>teacher</strong><br />

might include as a component of the Educator Growth<br />

Plan.<br />

It is important to note that this is not a comprehensive<br />

list of all evidence sources nor is it a checklist of things<br />

to do and/or provide. It simply offers some possible<br />

examples that might be included.<br />

The evidence provided is categorized by the three<br />

professional frames found on each of the <strong>teacher</strong>’s<br />

growth guides. In this way, <strong>teacher</strong>s and<br />

administrators can use this to clarify exactly what kind<br />

of evidence will indicate that growth in performance<br />

has occurred.<br />

Example<br />

Mrs. Johnson, in consultation with her administrator and perhaps also peers and/or a mentor, reviews the Possible Sources of Evidence<br />

documents and the Research and Proven Practices section of the Educator Evaluation System webpage to determine which new skills and<br />

strategies would be most appropriate given the particular growth opportunities of her selected indicators. Mrs. Johnson considers the following<br />

information as she works to complete her Educator Growth Plan:<br />

Quality Indicator 1.1: Content knowledge and academic language<br />

o Using the Research and Proven Practices section of the Educator Evaluation webpage, Mrs. Johnson observes that there are 23<br />

different Marzano instructional strategies that align to Quality Indicator 1.1. In reviewing these strategies, she and her<br />

administrator agree that strategy MDQ 2.12: “The <strong>teacher</strong> engages students in activities that help them record their<br />

understanding of new content in linguistic ways and/or represents the content in nonlinguistic ways” would be helpful for<br />

increasing a students’ use of academic language. From the Professional Impact section of the Possible Sources of Evidence for<br />

Missouri's educator <strong>evaluation</strong> system Page 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!