eq-ees-teacher-evaluation
eq-ees-teacher-evaluation eq-ees-teacher-evaluation
2 nd Year Teacher Practices - Summer Academic Year -- Teacher: Subject/Grade Level: Standard 1.1 – Content Knowledge Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Prepares to guide students to a deep understanding of content Stays current on new content and incorporates it into lesson design Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 1.3 Disciplinary Research and Inquiry Methodologies Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Demonstrates an understanding of research and inquiry methodologies Accepted methods of inquiry and research in the content area are included in lesson planning Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 3.1 – Implementing the Curriculum Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Learning experiences are appropriate for district curriculum and assessments Lesson plans demonstrate a coherence of learning objectives Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 4.2 – Instructional Resources Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Lesson design includes the use of developmentally appropriate instructional resources Planned learning activities include technologies where appropriate Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 9.1 – Induction and Collegial Activities Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Documents support and growth in mentor logs and aligned to the state’s mentor standards Meets regularly with the mentor to plan for the second year Comments: Overall Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Teacher’s Signature Date Evaluator’s Signature Date MISSOURI'S EDUCATOR EVALUATION SYSTEM
2 nd Year Teacher Practices - August Academic Year -- Teacher: Subject/Grade Level: Standard 1.2 Engaging in Content Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Plans and uses engagement strategies to maintain student interest Delivery of content keeps students interested and engaged Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 1.4 Interdisciplinary Instruction Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Connections are made between various content areas Connections are logical and add to overall learning Students understand the meaning of inter-disciplinary content connections Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 2.6 Language, Culture, Family, Community Values Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Collects and reviews demographic and biographical data of students Modifies instruction and learning activities based on particular student characteristics Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 5.2 Time, Space, Transitions, and Activities Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Class routines and structures support effective management of time, space, transitions and activities Students are engaged and responsive to the teacher’s classroom management strategies Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 6.4 Technology and Media Communication Tools Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Plans for and uses technology and media communication tools to enhance the learning process Students use technology effectively during instructional activities Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Standard 7.1 Use of Assessments Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished Lesson design includes multiple assessment modes, forms and approaches Formal and informal student assessments provide data about student status and progress before, during and after instruction Comments: Overall Comments: 0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 Teacher’s Signature Date Evaluator’s Signature Date MISSOURI'S EDUCATOR EVALUATION SYSTEM
- Page 57 and 58: Standard 5: Positive Classroom Envi
- Page 59 and 60: Standard 5: Positive Classroom Envi
- Page 61 and 62: Standard 6: Effective Communication
- Page 63 and 64: Standard 6: Effective Communication
- Page 65 and 66: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 67 and 68: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 69 and 70: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 71 and 72: Standard 7: Student Assessment and
- Page 73 and 74: Standard 8: Professionalism Quality
- Page 75 and 76: Standard 8: Professionalism Possibl
- Page 77 and 78: Standard 9: Professional Collaborat
- Page 79 and 80: Standard 9: Professional Collaborat
- Page 81 and 82: Sample Student Survey Questions (fo
- Page 83 and 84: Sample Survey Question Alignment Mi
- Page 85 and 86: 8. My child’s teacher regularly g
- Page 87 and 88: Growth Plan Missouri’s Educator E
- Page 89 and 90: Professional Growth Plan for Identi
- Page 91 and 92: Improvement Plan for: Identify Indi
- Page 93 and 94: Missouri's educator evaluation syst
- Page 95 and 96: Summative Evaluation Form Missouri
- Page 97 and 98: Standard 8: Self-Assessment and Imp
- Page 99 and 100: New Teacher Feedback Forms Missouri
- Page 101 and 102: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - Augus
- Page 103 and 104: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - Novem
- Page 105 and 106: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - Febru
- Page 107: 1 st Year Teacher Practices - June
- Page 111 and 112: 2 nd Year Teacher Practices - Novem
- Page 113 and 114: 2 nd Year Teacher Practices - Febru
- Page 115 and 116: 2 nd Year Teacher Practices - June
- Page 117 and 118: Research and Proven Practices Misso
- Page 119 and 120: Links to Research and Resources Mis
- Page 121 and 122: Introduction to the Literature Revi
- Page 123 and 124: MO Standard Evaluative Criteria for
- Page 125 and 126: feedback, and engage students in di
- Page 127 and 128: 1.4 Teacher makes interdisciplinary
- Page 129 and 130: Rothstein, P. (1990). Educational p
- Page 131 and 132: & Brown, 2005; Tieso, 2003; Tomlins
- Page 133 and 134: Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence re
- Page 135 and 136: Danielson (1996, 2007) asserts that
- Page 137 and 138: 0.61) on student achievement. Accor
- Page 139 and 140: Available from http://merc.soe.vcu.
- Page 141 and 142: deviations higher than the achievem
- Page 143 and 144: Several other studies have demonstr
- Page 145 and 146: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Practice
- Page 147 and 148: Research and Proven Practices of Dr
- Page 149 and 150: Missouri Domain 1 Teaching Routine
- Page 151 and 152: Missouri Indicator # of Marzano str
- Page 153 and 154: MDQ 2.9 Based on student needs, the
- Page 155 and 156: Teacher Growth Guide 1.2 - Marzano
- Page 157 and 158: MDQ 5.24 The teacher scans the room
2 nd Year Teacher Practices - Summer Academic Year --<br />
Teacher: Subject/Grade Level:<br />
Standard 1.1 – Content Knowledge Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished<br />
Prepares to guide students to a deep understanding of content<br />
Stays current on new content and incorporates it into lesson design<br />
Comments:<br />
0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7<br />
Standard 1.3 Disciplinary Research and Inquiry Methodologies Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished<br />
Demonstrates an understanding of research and inquiry methodologies<br />
Accepted methods of inquiry and research in the content area are included in lesson<br />
planning<br />
Comments:<br />
0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7<br />
Standard 3.1 – Implementing the Curriculum Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished<br />
Learning experiences are appropriate for district curriculum and assessments<br />
Lesson plans demonstrate a coherence of learning objectives<br />
Comments:<br />
0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7<br />
Standard 4.2 – Instructional Resources Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished<br />
Lesson design includes the use of developmentally appropriate instructional resources<br />
Planned learning activities include technologies where appropriate<br />
Comments:<br />
0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7<br />
Standard 9.1 – Induction and Collegial Activities Emerging Developing Proficient Distinguished<br />
Documents support and growth in mentor logs and aligned to the state’s mentor<br />
standards<br />
Meets regularly with the mentor to plan for the second year<br />
Comments:<br />
Overall Comments:<br />
0 – 1 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7<br />
Teacher’s Signature Date Evaluator’s Signature Date<br />
MISSOURI'S EDUCATOR EVALUATION SYSTEM