The Contribution of cocoa additive to cigarette smoking addiction
The Contribution of cocoa additive to cigarette smoking addiction The Contribution of cocoa additive to cigarette smoking addiction
Page 38 of 207 RIVM report 650270002 Caffeine smoking; smoking blocked the subjective stimulant effects of caffeine. The only cardiovascular effect noted was an increase in heart rate after smoking. Caffeine did not influence puffing behaviour; however, the increase in end-expired CO concentration after smoking was greater in the caffeine condition, suggesting subjects inhaled more smoke after caffeinated than decaffeinated coffee (48). In a placebo-controlled, double blind randomized design, the cardiovascular interaction between caffeine (250 mg intravenously) and nicotine (4 mg chewing gum) in 10 healthy volunteers was investigated, both under baseline conditions and during physical and mental stress (standing up and mental arithmetic). It was concluded that the combined administration of caffeine and nicotine showed additive effects on cardiovascular parameters during baseline conditions but less than additive effects during sympathoadrenal stimulation (49). The effects of caffeine (1.0-30.0 mg/kg) and nicotine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) administered alone and in combination on ventilation in unanesthetized rhesus monkeys was investigated. Caffeine produced marked, dose-dependent increases in ventilation. In contrast, acute administration of nicotine had less pronounced respiratory-stimulant effects. The joint effects of caffeine and nicotine on ventilation generally did not differ from those obtained with caffeine alone. Chronic administration of nicotine (1.0 mg/kg/day) for 4 consecutive weeks via osmotic pumps significantly decreased the half-life of caffeine but had little effect on ventilation or on sensitivity to the respiratory-stimulant effects of caffeine. Two primary metabolites of caffeine, theophylline and paraxanthine, were active as respiratory stimulants and were equipotent to caffeine, and the joint effects of caffeine and its metabolites were additive. The results indicate that caffeine and nicotine stimulate respiration through different pharmacological mechanisms, in contrast to caffeine and its metabolites, which exhibit a similar pharmacological profile. Moreover, significant pharmacokinetic interactions may be obtained when caffeine and nicotine are coadministered (50). Critical assessment Chemical By heating/combustion nitrous gases are formed. Caffeine is able to react with strong oxidants, resulting in radicals. It also forms complexes with compounds. In vivo Caffeine shows interaction effects with agonists/antagonists of the adenosine receptors, the liver enzyme system and phosphodiesterase. It has also mutagenic interaction effects. Conclusion Chemical Caffeine is able to form complexes with several chemicals; it forms also reactive radicals after oxidation. In vivo Caffeine has several systemic interaction effects in the body. Based on the low caffeine dose in cigarettes, it is unlikely whether these interactions play a role in the health effects of smoking. Of importance is the potential mutagenic effect of caffeine; the question is whether the low caffeine dose is able to display local mutagenic effects in the pulmonary system.
RIVM report 650270002 Page 39 of 207 Caffeine DEPENDENCY After sudden caffeine cessation, withdrawal symptoms develop in a small portion of the population but are moderate and transient. Tolerance to caffeine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity has been shown in animals. In humans, tolerance to some subjective effects of caffeine seems to occur, but most of the time complete tolerance to many effects of caffeine on the central nervous system does not occur. In animals, caffeine can act as a reinforcer, but only in a more limited range of conditions than with classical drugs of dependence. In humans, the reinforcing stimuli functions of caffeine are limited to low or rather moderate doses while high doses are usually avoided. The classical drugs of abuse lead to quite specific increases in cerebral functional activity and dopamine release in the shell of the nucleus accumbens, the key structure for reward, motivation and addiction. However, caffeine doses that reflect the daily human consumption, do not induce a release of dopamine in the shell of the nucleus accumbens but lead to a release of dopamine in the prefrontal cortex, which is consistent with caffeine reinforcing properties. Moreover, caffeine increases glucose utilization in the shell of the nucleus accumbens only at rather high doses that stimulate most brain structures, non-specifically, and likely reflect the side effects linked to high caffeine ingestion. That dose is also 5-10-fold higher than the one necessary to stimulate the caudate nucleus, which mediates motor activity and the structures regulating the sleep-wake cycle, the two functions the most sensitive to caffeine. In conclusion, it appears that although caffeine fulfils some of the criteria for drug dependence and shares with amphetamines and cocaine a certain specificity of action on the cerebral dopaminergic system, the methylxanthine does not act on the dopaminergic structures related to reward, motivation and addiction (51, 52). The pharmacology of caffeine in cocoa products has been thoroughly reviewed and the conclusion seems to be that this agent is not responsible for the craving qualities of chocolate (15, 53). Effects of smoking cessation There is a strong, significant relationship between coffee consumption and smoking. In six epidemiological studies reviewed and analyzed, 86.4 % of smokers consumed coffee versus 77.2 % of non-smokers. Ex-smokers use more coffee than non-smokers do, but somewhat less than smokers do. Seventeen experimental studies suggest that the pharmacological effect of caffeine in coffee may be partially but not totally responsible for the relationship. Conditioning, a reciprocal interaction (caffeine intake increases anxiety/arousal--nicotine decreases it), or joint effect of a third variable (e.g., stress, alcohol) may account for the relationship. In abstinent smokers, blood caffeine levels increase and remain elevated for as long as 6 months. These higher caffeine plasma levels may be sufficient to produce caffeine toxicity syndrome (54). Critical assessment Caffeine has low addictive properties and some causal relationship exists between caffeine intake from coffee and smoking. However, the low doses in the cigarettes is marginal compared with the high intake from other caffeine sources, such as coffee. At the other hand, caffeine could increase the nicotine availability through bronchodilatation, which subsequently could increase the addictive property of
- Page 1 and 2: RIVM report 650270002/2002 The cont
- Page 3 and 4: RIVM report 650270002 Page 3 of 207
- Page 5 and 6: RIVM report 650270002 Page 5 of 207
- Page 7 and 8: RIVM report 650270002 Page 7 of 207
- Page 9 and 10: RIVM report 650270002 Page 9 of 207
- Page 11 and 12: RIVM report 650270002 Page 11 of 20
- Page 13 and 14: RIVM report 650270002 Page 13 of 20
- Page 15 and 16: RIVM report 650270002 Page 15 of 20
- Page 17 and 18: RIVM report 650270002 Page 17 of 20
- Page 19 and 20: RIVM report 650270002 Page 19 of 20
- Page 21 and 22: RIVM report 650270002 Page 21 of 20
- Page 23 and 24: RIVM report 650270002 Page 23 of 20
- Page 25 and 26: RIVM report 650270002 Page 25 of 20
- Page 27 and 28: RIVM report 650270002 Page 27 of 20
- Page 29 and 30: RIVM report 650270002 Page 29 of 20
- Page 31 and 32: RIVM report 650270002 Page 31 of 20
- Page 33 and 34: RIVM report 650270002 Page 33 of 20
- Page 35 and 36: RIVM report 650270002 Page 35 of 20
- Page 37: RIVM report 650270002 Page 37 of 20
- Page 41 and 42: RIVM report 650270002 Page 41 of 20
- Page 43 and 44: RIVM report 650270002 Page 43 of 20
- Page 45 and 46: RIVM report 650270002 Page 45 of 20
- Page 47 and 48: Page 47 of 207 RIVM report 65027000
- Page 49 and 50: RIVM report 650270002 Page 49 of 20
- Page 51 and 52: RIVM report 650270002 Page 51 of 20
- Page 53 and 54: RIVM report 650270002 Page 53 of 20
- Page 55 and 56: RIVM report 650270002 Page 55 of 20
- Page 57 and 58: RIVM report 650270002 Page 57 of 20
- Page 59 and 60: RIVM report 650270002 Page 59 of 20
- Page 61 and 62: RIVM report 650270002 Page 61 of 20
- Page 63 and 64: RIVM report 650270002 Page 63 of 20
- Page 65 and 66: RIVM report 650270002 Page 65 of 20
- Page 67 and 68: RIVM report 650270002 Page 67 of 20
- Page 69 and 70: RIVM report 650270002 Page 69 of 20
- Page 71 and 72: RIVM report 650270002 Page 71 of 20
- Page 73 and 74: RIVM report 650270002 Page 73 of 20
- Page 75 and 76: RIVM report 650270002 Page 75 of 20
- Page 77 and 78: RIVM report 650270002 Page 77 of 20
- Page 79 and 80: RIVM report 650270002 Page 79 of 20
- Page 81 and 82: RIVM report 650270002 Page 81 of 20
- Page 83 and 84: RIVM report 650270002 Page 83 of 20
- Page 85 and 86: RIVM report 650270002 Page 85 of 20
- Page 87 and 88: RIVM report 650270002 Page 87 of 20
RIVM report 650270002 Page 39 <strong>of</strong> 207<br />
Caffeine<br />
DEPENDENCY<br />
After sudden caffeine cessation, withdrawal symp<strong>to</strong>ms develop in a small portion <strong>of</strong><br />
the population but are moderate and transient. Tolerance <strong>to</strong> caffeine-induced<br />
stimulation <strong>of</strong> locomo<strong>to</strong>r activity has been shown in animals. In humans, <strong>to</strong>lerance <strong>to</strong><br />
some subjective effects <strong>of</strong> caffeine seems <strong>to</strong> occur, but most <strong>of</strong> the time complete<br />
<strong>to</strong>lerance <strong>to</strong> many effects <strong>of</strong> caffeine on the central nervous system does not occur. In<br />
animals, caffeine can act as a reinforcer, but only in a more limited range <strong>of</strong><br />
conditions than with classical drugs <strong>of</strong> dependence. In humans, the reinforcing stimuli<br />
functions <strong>of</strong> caffeine are limited <strong>to</strong> low or rather moderate doses while high doses are<br />
usually avoided. <strong>The</strong> classical drugs <strong>of</strong> abuse lead <strong>to</strong> quite specific increases in<br />
cerebral functional activity and dopamine release in the shell <strong>of</strong> the nucleus<br />
accumbens, the key structure for reward, motivation and <strong>addiction</strong>. However, caffeine<br />
doses that reflect the daily human consumption, do not induce a release <strong>of</strong> dopamine<br />
in the shell <strong>of</strong> the nucleus accumbens but lead <strong>to</strong> a release <strong>of</strong> dopamine in the<br />
prefrontal cortex, which is consistent with caffeine reinforcing properties. Moreover,<br />
caffeine increases glucose utilization in the shell <strong>of</strong> the nucleus accumbens only at<br />
rather high doses that stimulate most brain structures, non-specifically, and likely<br />
reflect the side effects linked <strong>to</strong> high caffeine ingestion. That dose is also 5-10-fold<br />
higher than the one necessary <strong>to</strong> stimulate the caudate nucleus, which mediates mo<strong>to</strong>r<br />
activity and the structures regulating the sleep-wake cycle, the two functions the most<br />
sensitive <strong>to</strong> caffeine. In conclusion, it appears that although caffeine fulfils some <strong>of</strong><br />
the criteria for drug dependence and shares with amphetamines and cocaine a certain<br />
specificity <strong>of</strong> action on the cerebral dopaminergic system, the methylxanthine does<br />
not act on the dopaminergic structures related <strong>to</strong> reward, motivation and <strong>addiction</strong><br />
(51, 52).<br />
<strong>The</strong> pharmacology <strong>of</strong> caffeine in <strong>cocoa</strong> products has been thoroughly reviewed and<br />
the conclusion seems <strong>to</strong> be that this agent is not responsible for the craving qualities<br />
<strong>of</strong> chocolate (15, 53).<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>smoking</strong> cessation<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a strong, significant relationship between c<strong>of</strong>fee consumption and <strong>smoking</strong>.<br />
In six epidemiological studies reviewed and analyzed, 86.4 % <strong>of</strong> smokers consumed<br />
c<strong>of</strong>fee versus 77.2 % <strong>of</strong> non-smokers. Ex-smokers use more c<strong>of</strong>fee than non-smokers<br />
do, but somewhat less than smokers do. Seventeen experimental studies suggest that<br />
the pharmacological effect <strong>of</strong> caffeine in c<strong>of</strong>fee may be partially but not <strong>to</strong>tally<br />
responsible for the relationship. Conditioning, a reciprocal interaction (caffeine intake<br />
increases anxiety/arousal--nicotine decreases it), or joint effect <strong>of</strong> a third variable<br />
(e.g., stress, alcohol) may account for the relationship. In abstinent smokers, blood<br />
caffeine levels increase and remain elevated for as long as 6 months. <strong>The</strong>se higher<br />
caffeine plasma levels may be sufficient <strong>to</strong> produce caffeine <strong>to</strong>xicity syndrome (54).<br />
Critical assessment<br />
Caffeine has low addictive properties and some causal relationship exists between<br />
caffeine intake from c<strong>of</strong>fee and <strong>smoking</strong>. However, the low doses in the <strong>cigarette</strong>s is<br />
marginal compared with the high intake from other caffeine sources, such as c<strong>of</strong>fee.<br />
At the other hand, caffeine could increase the nicotine availability through<br />
bronchodilatation, which subsequently could increase the addictive property <strong>of</strong>