Abstracts - International Initiative for Georgian Cultural Studies
Abstracts - International Initiative for Georgian Cultural Studies Abstracts - International Initiative for Georgian Cultural Studies
carving. The study of Georgian repousse ornaments should be conducted in many different directions: the chronological grouping of ornamental motives, definition of their function, symbolic meaning, style, peculiarities, techniques, a search for a wide and rich parallel material, as well as their links with Georgian architectural decoration. As a consequence the conclusions of these studies will define the worth place of Georgian repousse ornament in the Georgian and world history of ornamental decoration. Maria Lidova Scuola Normale Superiora. Italy Creating a Liturgical Space: the Sinai Complex of Icons by Ioannes Tsohabi. This paper deals with six icons from the collection of St. Catherine’s monastery on Mount Sinai in Egypt. Four of the panels are calendar icons. A fifth represents the Last Judgment while the last one bears a unique representation of five miraculous icons of the Virgin and a narrative cycle dedicated to the miracles and passions of Christ. A range from the late eleventh early twelfth century has been proposed for the dating of these images. This group of icons is one of several testimonies pointing to the active presence of Georgian monks on Sinai in the Middle Byzantine period. The Georgian origin of these images is confirmed not only by a particularly expressive style that still awaits detailed analysis and comparison with Georgian paintings, but also by bilingual inscriptions (every Greek name is complemented by its Georgian equivalent). A short Georgian inscription under the throne of Redeemer in the scene of the Last Judgment records the priest Ioannes Tsohabi as a commissioner of the icon. The same name, Ioannes, is cited in four large Greek epigrams that decorate the reverses of the icons. These Greek inscriptions are a work of a master poet, a great connoisseur of Greek texts and literature. Though these icons have already been discussed by various art historians, several problems remain unresolved. Previous studies have generally treated the icons individually. In this paper, I will analyze the icons as a single and coherent project. In my view, it is quite probable that all six were displayed together and thus created and defined a particular liturgical space. Their unity is confirmed by the sophisticated Greek epigrams, their original iconographic programs, and their stylistic and typological similarity. Through a comparison with illuminated manuscripts and monumental paintings, it is possible to demonstrate that the Sinai complex of icons had specific liturgical meanings. Finally, these icons are of great importance for understanding the mutual relations between Georgian and Byzantine art. Nana Burchuladze Georgian National Museum. Georgia MEDIEVAL GEORGIA Georgian Icons at St. Catherine’s Monastery on Mount Sinai (To Georgian-Byzantine Interrelations) The Mount Sinai and the monastery of St. Catherine are among the most important spiritual centers of the Christian East. Georgians were always attracted to this sacred site – traces of their presence can be detected from the 6 th century. The activities of Georgians were especially intense between the ninth and tenth centuries as evident from the amount of translated ecclesiastic literature and icons painted by Georgian monks. The Sinai collection of icons also comprised these relics brought from Georgia. Recently Georgian scholars were given the opportunity to study Georgian manuscripts kept on the Mount Sinai. The catalogue of this treasure was 89
also published. As for Georgian icons, little information exists on them. Obviously, in this situation the unveiling and study of each Georgian icon is of a special importance, as they provide the valuable information on the spiritual life and activities of Georgian monks on the Mount Sinai. The collection of documentary information regarding these icons from the collection of St. Catherine’s Monastery and which were subsequently bought by a Russian collectors in the 19 th century and which are lost for today, is a very important issue. The paper aims at presenting one of those Sinai icons, particularly the fragmented polyptych with Georgian inscriptions, which depicts common Christian Saints alongside Georgian saints—the Syrian and Athonite fathers and other Georgian eminent spiritual figures. The onsite study of the icon and of related material reveals that information regarding this work of art in scientific literature is misleading. While studying the icons, we had the opportunity to determine their composition and iconographic program, investigate the technique and style in which they were executed, as well as date this masterpiece to the first half of 14 th century based on the comparative analyses. Along with the study of the aforementioned polyptych, we have also submitted relatively comprehensive information regarding the Georgian icons, which formed and continue to form a part of the Sinai Collection. We hope that the results of this accomplished study will be interesting and useful both for the study of the medieval Georgian icon painting and for the history of Sinai and Orthodox icons in general. Alexsander Saminski Andrei Rublev Museum, Russia The Miniatures and Origin of the Berti Gospel The Berti Gospel book (Tbilisi, Q-906) is famous for its late-twelfth-century silver-gilt covers made by the goldsmith Beshken at the Opiza Monastery. The manuscript was donated to the neighboring Monastery of Berti by a monk named Iovane Mtavraidze, who inherited it from his brother and uncle. Though his dedicatory inscription does not specify where the Gospel was copied, the book’s miniatures provide key evidence for its origin. Though presently kept separately, they were at first integral to the volume, as it can be deduced from their page size and from the marginal traces of sewing holes that match those of the codex’s binding. The Berti portrait of Saint Luke is a direct copy of a miniature in a late-twelfth-century manuscript at Dumbarton Oaks, Ms 4. The codices are also similar in terms of format, ruling type and number of lines per page. They should have been written at adjacent locations. The excellent execution of the Washington miniatures suggests Constantinopolitan origin, but the volume’s modest headpieces in red ink and the mediocre quality of its parchment show that other possibilities should not be excluded. All of the Berti Gospels’ evangelist portraits find close counterparts in a Georgian manuscript held at the St. Petersburg Institute of Oriental Studies, E 45. This codex probably has the same origin as the Berti and Washington ones. A Greek inscription of its owner under the image of Matthew suggests that in 1832 it was in a Greek milieu. Some of its headpieces closely resemble Greek and Georgian manuscripts produced in Antioch in the 11 th century. One of those books is the present Tbilisi Q-371 copied by a priest named Iovane Mtavaraidze in 1091. The family of the owner of the Berti Gospels - Iovane Mtavraidze thus seems to have had old connections with Antioch 90 MEDIEVAL GEORGIA
- Page 40 and 41: ANCIENT GEORGIA Nino Shanshashvili,
- Page 42 and 43: ANCIENT GEORGIA Mikheil Abramishvil
- Page 44 and 45: ANCIENT GEORGIA Nino Gomelauri G. C
- Page 46 and 47: ANCIENT GEORGIA the fourth arch (pl
- Page 48 and 49: ANCIENT GEORGIA Teimuraz Bibiluri M
- Page 50 and 51: ANCIENT GEORGIA Merab Khalvashi Bat
- Page 52 and 53: II seqcia Sua saukuneebis saqarTvel
- Page 54 and 55: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo xiluli d
- Page 56 and 57: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo SeiZleba
- Page 58 and 59: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo irine ma
- Page 60 and 61: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo am relie
- Page 62 and 63: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo jon vilk
- Page 64 and 65: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo daviT xo
- Page 66 and 67: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo mxat vru
- Page 68 and 69: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo adreqris
- Page 70 and 71: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo ufro ber
- Page 72 and 73: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo Tavis wa
- Page 74 and 75: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo izolda m
- Page 76 and 77: Christopher Haas Villanova Universi
- Page 78 and 79: from the 15th-18th c compare with i
- Page 80 and 81: define the place of action and emph
- Page 82 and 83: MEDIEVAL GEORGIA masters: Sometimes
- Page 84 and 85: MEDIEVAL GEORGIA the different Poly
- Page 86 and 87: Markus Bogisch University of Copenh
- Page 88 and 89: Edith Neubauer University of Leipzi
- Page 92 and 93: MEDIEVAL GEORGIA Nino Kavtaria Nati
- Page 94 and 95: sastendo moxsenebebi / Poster Prese
- Page 96 and 97: III seqcia modernizmi saqarTveloSi
- Page 98 and 99: modernizmi saqarTveloSi gadawyvetas
- Page 100 and 101: modernizmi saqarTveloSi aRniSnuli t
- Page 102 and 103: modernizmi saqarTveloSi sacxovrebel
- Page 104 and 105: modernizmi saqarTveloSi maTi Semdgo
- Page 106 and 107: modernizmi saqarTveloSi ganviTarebi
- Page 108 and 109: modernizmi saqarTveloSi dakavSirebu
- Page 110 and 111: Gaston Buachidze de l’Académie d
- Page 112 and 113: MODERNISM IN GEORGIA Nana Kipiani G
- Page 114 and 115: MODERNISM IN GEORGIA Georgian Art N
- Page 116 and 117: MODERNISM IN GEORGIA Mzia Chikhradz
- Page 118 and 119: MODERNISM IN GEORGIA Tea Urushadze
- Page 120 and 121: IV seqcia restavracia/konservacia b
- Page 122 and 123: estavracia/konservacia gadawyvetile
- Page 124 and 125: estavracia/konservacia Selesilobis
- Page 126 and 127: estavracia/konservacia franCesko im
- Page 128 and 129: estavracia/konservacia da spilenZis
- Page 130 and 131: estavracia/konservacia Tea kinwuraS
- Page 132 and 133: Maia Shavishvili Department of Cult
- Page 134 and 135: RESTORATION/CONSERVATION Nicholas,
- Page 136 and 137: RESTORATION/CONSERVATION Francesco
- Page 138 and 139: RESTORATION/CONSERVATION Mari Claud
carving.<br />
The study of <strong>Georgian</strong> repousse ornaments should be conducted in many different directions: the<br />
chronological grouping of ornamental motives, definition of their function, symbolic meaning, style,<br />
peculiarities, techniques, a search <strong>for</strong> a wide and rich parallel material, as well as their links with <strong>Georgian</strong><br />
architectural decoration. As a consequence the conclusions of these studies will define the worth place of<br />
<strong>Georgian</strong> repousse ornament in the <strong>Georgian</strong> and world history of ornamental decoration.<br />
Maria Lidova<br />
Scuola Normale Superiora. Italy<br />
Creating a Liturgical Space: the Sinai Complex of Icons by Ioannes Tsohabi.<br />
This paper deals with six icons from the collection of St. Catherine’s monastery on Mount Sinai in Egypt.<br />
Four of the panels are calendar icons. A fifth represents the Last Judgment while the last one bears a unique<br />
representation of five miraculous icons of the Virgin and a narrative cycle dedicated to the miracles and passions<br />
of Christ. A range from the late eleventh early twelfth century has been proposed <strong>for</strong> the dating of these<br />
images.<br />
This group of icons is one of several testimonies pointing to the active presence of <strong>Georgian</strong> monks on<br />
Sinai in the Middle Byzantine period. The <strong>Georgian</strong> origin of these images is confirmed not only by a particularly<br />
expressive style that still awaits detailed analysis and comparison with <strong>Georgian</strong> paintings, but also<br />
by bilingual inscriptions (every Greek name is complemented by its <strong>Georgian</strong> equivalent). A short <strong>Georgian</strong><br />
inscription under the throne of Redeemer in the scene of the Last Judgment records the priest Ioannes Tsohabi<br />
as a commissioner of the icon. The same name, Ioannes, is cited in four large Greek epigrams that decorate<br />
the reverses of the icons. These Greek inscriptions are a work of a master poet, a great connoisseur of Greek<br />
texts and literature.<br />
Though these icons have already been discussed by various art historians, several problems remain unresolved.<br />
Previous studies have generally treated the icons individually. In this paper, I will analyze the icons<br />
as a single and coherent project. In my view, it is quite probable that all six were displayed together and thus<br />
created and defined a particular liturgical space. Their unity is confirmed by the sophisticated Greek epigrams,<br />
their original iconographic programs, and their stylistic and typological similarity. Through a comparison<br />
with illuminated manuscripts and monumental paintings, it is possible to demonstrate that the Sinai complex<br />
of icons had specific liturgical meanings. Finally, these icons are of great importance <strong>for</strong> understanding the<br />
mutual relations between <strong>Georgian</strong> and Byzantine art.<br />
Nana Burchuladze<br />
<strong>Georgian</strong> National Museum. Georgia<br />
MEDIEVAL GEORGIA<br />
<strong>Georgian</strong> Icons at St. Catherine’s Monastery on Mount Sinai (To <strong>Georgian</strong>-Byzantine<br />
Interrelations)<br />
The Mount Sinai and the monastery of St. Catherine are among the most important spiritual centers<br />
of the Christian East. <strong>Georgian</strong>s were always attracted to this sacred site – traces of their presence can be<br />
detected from the 6 th century.<br />
The activities of <strong>Georgian</strong>s were especially intense between the ninth and tenth centuries as evident<br />
from the amount of translated ecclesiastic literature and icons painted by <strong>Georgian</strong> monks. The Sinai collection<br />
of icons also comprised these relics brought from Georgia. Recently <strong>Georgian</strong> scholars were given<br />
the opportunity to study <strong>Georgian</strong> manuscripts kept on the Mount Sinai. The catalogue of this treasure was<br />
89