Abstracts - International Initiative for Georgian Cultural Studies
Abstracts - International Initiative for Georgian Cultural Studies Abstracts - International Initiative for Georgian Cultural Studies
ANCIENT GEORGIA the fourth arch (pl.I-1b) is Pan. The figure illustrated in the fifth arch (pl.I-1f) expresses the mad Lycurgus. The second vessel is divided in two scenes. In the first scene Belerophon is sitting on Pegasus (pl.I-c, pl.II-2) while fighting the chimera (pl.I-2b). The other scene (pl.I-2d) depicts a woman sitting on the knees of a man. The kneeling figure can be identified as Belerophon and the woman must be interpreted as princess Phylonoe.An exact parallel of the ewers is kept at the Corning Museum of Glass. Its shape and painting technology is fully analogous to the Khovle vessels and contains the same inscription on the neck. A fragment in white glass and painted with the same technology was found in Dura Europos and at Tanais excavations. It is assumed these vessels were made in the same workshop, even by the same master around the end of the second or beginning of the third century AD in Antioch-on-Orontes. Notwithstanding whether the hypothesis concerning their place of production is right or wrong, it is proved with confidence that the five vessels from Khovle, Kerch, Tanais and Dura Europos were produced at the same workshop, if not by one single master. Tamaz Sanikidze G. Chubinashvili National Center of Georgian Art History and Monuments Protection. Georgia About the Main Stages in the History of the Rock-Carved Town of Uplistsikhe The first sign of human activity on the cliff of Uplistsikhe can be traced to the beginning of the first millennium BC. It was at that time that the formation of a theocratic community, later to reach hegemony in Shida (Inner) Kartli, began (it is assumed that before Mtskheta, Uplistsikhe had been the capital of Kartli). At the end of the fourth and the beginning of the third century BC, this long process was culminated by the construction of the capital, the overall appearance and separate structures of which have been discovered after excavating and cleaning the area. The city was divided into three parts. Its urban and functional structure fully agrees with Strabo’s note, which stated that one of the theocratic communities in the South Caucasus consisted of pagan priests, theophorites (free servants of the cult) and hierodules (temple slaves). On the west, the city was guarded by a steep cliff and on the east and the north by a strong wall. It had four gates, a tunnel leading down to the Mtkvari River and a defensive ditch with a broad platform. The caves made in the period of Antiquity can be classified into three distinct typological groups: i) temples with a vaulted portico, characterized by a semi-circular vault topped by an open portico with closed room(s) behind and an open yard-hall in front, of which simple and complex variants exist; ii) halltype temples characterized by a hall with a flat ceiling and an open yard-hall in its front; iii) round, domed temples. Rock-carved temples followed the rules of aboveground (stone and timber) architecture. Pillars, pilasters, bases, capitals, arches, vaults, beams, and caissons were widely used. Thus, a wide repertoire of building art was employed. During its six to seven hundred years of existence, the city lived a continuously vibrant life, which can be evidenced by written records and rich archaeological material uncovered on the site. But with the adoption of Christianity in the country, the role and significance of Uplistsikhe reduced significantly. In the sixth century, however, a new revival of the site began. A large three-nave basilica, partly carved in cliff, was constructed and former temples were converted into dwellings, some of which were double-storied. In the ninth to tenth century, Uplistsikhe became a prominent city and a citadel, which united all the 45
forces fighting for the unification of the country. A three-nave basilica in honor of the prince was constructed in the centre of the city in the 10 th century. The 1230s saw the end of this long period of advancement in Uplistsikhe. ”And it was a city until Genghis,” said the 18 th century historian and geographer, Prince Vakushti Bagrationi. This period was followed by an irrevocable decline. In the late Middle Ages, the city’s structures became a monastery belonging to Svetitskhoveli at Mtskheta, and were later passed on from one king or feudal lord to another. Beginning in the 19 th century, the city was finally deserted. Regular archaeological investigations of the site commenced in 1957 and continue to the present day. Mariam Gvelesiani Georgian National Museum. Georgia For the Interpretation of an Anthropomorphic Figure from Katlanikhevi The Great Mother of Nature or the female deity associated with femininity used to be worshipped as the “Great Mother Nana” in Georgia. “Nana”, which derives from the Sumerian goddess “Innana”, as well as its transliterated forms-Nano, Ana, Nena, Nino, Nina and Nane- means “mother” in Persian, Armenian, Tatar, Tajik, Turkish as well as west Georgian dialects. That this cult was worshipped in the Chalcolithic Age (fifth millennium BC) is evidenced by female anthropomorphic, so-called “naturalistic”, figurines from Khramis Didi-Gora, which are considered to be images of the Great Mother, guardian of nature. They find parallels with contemporaneous figurines unearthed in Mesopotamia, Persia, Asia Minor, and Armenia. It has been accepted in scientific literature that the hypostasis of the Sun-woman, which ranks second in the triad of ancient Georgian deities (God – the moon, the Sun-Woman and Kviria) is the Great Mother Nana. Consequently, the latter is perceived as a female deity associated with the Sun. Therefore according to archaeological inventory, worship of its cult is linked to solar attributes (circular shrines, spindleweights, cart wheels, disco-shaped items, etc). The theory of sameness of the cult of Nana and the Sun deity was developed based on the findings of a mono-disciplinary study, namely the analysis of ethnographic evidence, and without the consideration of a systemic line of the genesis, development, transformation and synchronization of Mother Nana in a broader context of culture and civilizations. Such approach has therefore yielded results different from those adopted in international scholarly circles, where the correlation between this well-known female deity and the Moon, rather than the Sun, is supported by sound arguments. The supposition that Nana/Innana (the same as Ishtar) is the female deity associated with the Moon in the civilizations neighboring Georgia is backed by the iconography of Nana/Innana’s Persian correlate Anahita, her Greek correlate during the Hellenic period, Artemid, and her Central Asian correlate, the deity Nano, in the form of a crescent above the heads of the figures of these divinities. Clay hot-reliefs with female heads found in the first structure of Katlanikhevi at the ancient settlement of Uplistsikhe are considered by Prof. D. Khakhutaishvili as works of ritual fine arts. The scholar makes particular note of the Great Mother Nana in his analysis of the disco-shaped items unearthed together, which he associates with the material manifestation of the solar cult. Of special note is a small ox figurine found nearby, which offers evidence suggesting an entirely different interpretation of the identification of the figurine as the Great Mother Nana (identification with the moon). 46 ANCIENT GEORGIA
- Page 2 and 3: vaxtang beriZis saxelobis qarTuli x
- Page 4 and 5: Sinaarsi misalmeba nikoloz vaCeiSvi
- Page 6 and 7: maria lidova. liturgiuli sivrcis Se
- Page 8 and 9: CONTENTS Preface Nikoloz Vacheishvi
- Page 10 and 11: Irine Abesadze. From Georgian Moder
- Page 12 and 13: keTili iyos Tqveni mobrZaneba saqar
- Page 14 and 15: I would like to wish you all a warm
- Page 16 and 17: simpoziumi madlobas uxdis saqarTvel
- Page 18 and 19: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Organizational Com
- Page 20 and 21: 1974 wels italiis qalaq, bergamoSi,
- Page 22 and 23: In 1974, in Bergamo, Italy, an inte
- Page 24 and 25: nino jayeli saqarTvelos erovnuli mu
- Page 26 and 27: uZvelesi saqarTvelo Suabrinjaos xan
- Page 28 and 29: uZvelesi saqarTvelo saqarTvelos ”
- Page 30 and 31: uZvelesi saqarTvelo mis Tanadroul C
- Page 32 and 33: uZvelesi saqarTvelo mamakacis muxle
- Page 34 and 35: uZvelesi saqarTvelo Teimuraz bibilu
- Page 36 and 37: uZvelesi saqarTvelo dasavleT xmelTa
- Page 38 and 39: I SECTION ANCIENT GEORGIA
- Page 40 and 41: ANCIENT GEORGIA Nino Shanshashvili,
- Page 42 and 43: ANCIENT GEORGIA Mikheil Abramishvil
- Page 44 and 45: ANCIENT GEORGIA Nino Gomelauri G. C
- Page 48 and 49: ANCIENT GEORGIA Teimuraz Bibiluri M
- Page 50 and 51: ANCIENT GEORGIA Merab Khalvashi Bat
- Page 52 and 53: II seqcia Sua saukuneebis saqarTvel
- Page 54 and 55: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo xiluli d
- Page 56 and 57: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo SeiZleba
- Page 58 and 59: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo irine ma
- Page 60 and 61: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo am relie
- Page 62 and 63: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo jon vilk
- Page 64 and 65: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo daviT xo
- Page 66 and 67: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo mxat vru
- Page 68 and 69: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo adreqris
- Page 70 and 71: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo ufro ber
- Page 72 and 73: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo Tavis wa
- Page 74 and 75: Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelo izolda m
- Page 76 and 77: Christopher Haas Villanova Universi
- Page 78 and 79: from the 15th-18th c compare with i
- Page 80 and 81: define the place of action and emph
- Page 82 and 83: MEDIEVAL GEORGIA masters: Sometimes
- Page 84 and 85: MEDIEVAL GEORGIA the different Poly
- Page 86 and 87: Markus Bogisch University of Copenh
- Page 88 and 89: Edith Neubauer University of Leipzi
- Page 90 and 91: carving. The study of Georgian repo
- Page 92 and 93: MEDIEVAL GEORGIA Nino Kavtaria Nati
- Page 94 and 95: sastendo moxsenebebi / Poster Prese
<strong>for</strong>ces fighting <strong>for</strong> the unification of the country. A three-nave basilica in honor of the prince was constructed<br />
in the centre of the city in the 10 th century.<br />
The 1230s saw the end of this long period of advancement in Uplistsikhe. ”And it was a city until<br />
Genghis,” said the 18 th century historian and geographer, Prince Vakushti Bagrationi. This period was<br />
followed by an irrevocable decline. In the late Middle Ages, the city’s structures became a monastery<br />
belonging to Svetitskhoveli at Mtskheta, and were later passed on from one king or feudal lord to another.<br />
Beginning in the 19 th century, the city was finally deserted.<br />
Regular archaeological investigations of the site commenced in 1957 and continue to the present day.<br />
Mariam Gvelesiani<br />
<strong>Georgian</strong> National Museum. Georgia<br />
For the Interpretation of an Anthropomorphic Figure from Katlanikhevi<br />
The Great Mother of Nature or the female deity associated with femininity used to be worshipped as the<br />
“Great Mother Nana” in Georgia. “Nana”, which derives from the Sumerian goddess “Innana”, as well as<br />
its transliterated <strong>for</strong>ms-Nano, Ana, Nena, Nino, Nina and Nane- means “mother” in Persian, Armenian, Tatar,<br />
Tajik, Turkish as well as west <strong>Georgian</strong> dialects. That this cult was worshipped in the Chalcolithic Age<br />
(fifth millennium BC) is evidenced by female anthropomorphic, so-called “naturalistic”, figurines from<br />
Khramis Didi-Gora, which are considered to be images of the Great Mother, guardian of nature. They find<br />
parallels with contemporaneous figurines unearthed in Mesopotamia, Persia, Asia Minor, and Armenia.<br />
It has been accepted in scientific literature that the hypostasis of the Sun-woman, which ranks second<br />
in the triad of ancient <strong>Georgian</strong> deities (God – the moon, the Sun-Woman and Kviria) is the Great Mother<br />
Nana. Consequently, the latter is perceived as a female deity associated with the Sun. There<strong>for</strong>e according<br />
to archaeological inventory, worship of its cult is linked to solar attributes (circular shrines, spindleweights,<br />
cart wheels, disco-shaped items, etc).<br />
The theory of sameness of the cult of Nana and the Sun deity was developed based on the findings of a<br />
mono-disciplinary study, namely the analysis of ethnographic evidence, and without the consideration of a<br />
systemic line of the genesis, development, trans<strong>for</strong>mation and synchronization of Mother Nana in a broader<br />
context of culture and civilizations. Such approach has there<strong>for</strong>e yielded results different from those adopted<br />
in international scholarly circles, where the correlation between this well-known female deity and the<br />
Moon, rather than the Sun, is supported by sound arguments. The supposition that Nana/Innana (the same<br />
as Ishtar) is the female deity associated with the Moon in the civilizations neighboring Georgia is backed by<br />
the iconography of Nana/Innana’s Persian correlate Anahita, her Greek correlate during the Hellenic period,<br />
Artemid, and her Central Asian correlate, the deity Nano, in the <strong>for</strong>m of a crescent above the heads of the<br />
figures of these divinities.<br />
Clay hot-reliefs with female heads found in the first structure of Katlanikhevi at the ancient settlement<br />
of Uplistsikhe are considered by Prof. D. Khakhutaishvili as works of ritual fine arts. The scholar makes<br />
particular note of the Great Mother Nana in his analysis of the disco-shaped items unearthed together,<br />
which he associates with the material manifestation of the solar cult. Of special note is a small ox figurine<br />
found nearby, which offers evidence suggesting an entirely different interpretation of the identification of<br />
the figurine as the Great Mother Nana (identification with the moon).<br />
46<br />
ANCIENT GEORGIA