03.06.2013 Views

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2546<br />

2547<br />

2548<br />

2549<br />

2550<br />

2551<br />

2552<br />

2553<br />

2554<br />

2555<br />

2556<br />

2557<br />

2558<br />

2559<br />

2560<br />

2561<br />

2562<br />

2563<br />

2564<br />

2565<br />

2566<br />

2567<br />

2568<br />

2569<br />

2570<br />

2571<br />

2572<br />

2573<br />

2574<br />

2575<br />

2576<br />

2577<br />

2578<br />

2579<br />

2580<br />

2581<br />

2582<br />

2583<br />

2584<br />

2585<br />

2586<br />

2587<br />

2588<br />

2589<br />

2590<br />

2591<br />

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />

similar to the fraction <strong>of</strong> 228 Th escaping by recoil, and therefore presumably similar to<br />

the fraction <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn escaping by recoil, since the recoil ranges <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn and 228 Th are<br />

similar (Griffith et al, 1980).<br />

(164) Johnson and Peterman (1984) developed a model to describe the emanation <strong>of</strong><br />

220<br />

Rn from ThO2 particles by alpha-particle recoil, and its exhalation from the lungs.<br />

They calculated that the fraction <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn atoms produced that escaped from particles<br />

(density 10 g cm –3 ) by recoil decreased from ~1.0 at 1 nm to ~0.5 at 10 nm and ~0.1<br />

at 0.5 µm diameter. The average fraction for an aerosol <strong>of</strong> AMAD 1 µm was<br />

calculated to be 0.2, which seems to be broadly consistent with the results derived by<br />

Griffith et al (1980).<br />

(165) Thus it seems that recoil is a mechanism that is at least as important as<br />

diffusion for emanation <strong>of</strong> radon from particles. It seems possible that it is the<br />

dominant mechanism, in which case for aerosols <strong>of</strong> AMAD about 1 µm there would<br />

be a release to lung air <strong>of</strong> ~10% <strong>of</strong> 222 Rn, 220 Rn or 219 Rn formed in particles in the<br />

lungs. Furthermore, alpha-particle recoil applies not only to radon formed as a decay<br />

product, but also to other decay products formed by alpha emission. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

decay chains, this will result in successively lower activities <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the chain<br />

compared to the parent retained in relatively insoluble particles. There is some<br />

experimental evidence confirming this (see thorium inhalation section). However, it<br />

was considered impractical to implement loss <strong>of</strong> decay products by alpha recoil in the<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> dose coefficients and bioassay functions in this series <strong>of</strong> documents.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the fractional loss for representative workplace aerosols would be<br />

complex, because it depends on the alpha decay energy, the size distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

deposited particles, and their shape and density: simplifying assumptions would be<br />

needed for practical implementation. Investigations conducted at by the Task Group<br />

into the effect <strong>of</strong> recoil on doses for inhaled 232 U and its decay products following<br />

inhalation in relatively insoluble particles found, as expected, that doses to the<br />

respiratory tract decreased and doses to tissues resulting from systemic uptake<br />

increased. However, there was little impact on effective dose in this example. The<br />

computational effort involved in identifying radionuclides formed by alpha decay, and<br />

partitioning the decay product atoms between a fraction remaining in the particle and<br />

a fraction escaping to lung fluids would be considerable, and was considered<br />

disproportionate to the benefit gained on a routine basis as in these documents. For<br />

calculation purposes the assumption that radon formed as a decay product within the<br />

respiratory tract escapes from the body at a rate <strong>of</strong> 100 d –1 is retained in this series <strong>of</strong><br />

documents. Nevertheless, this phenomenon should be borne in mind, especially when<br />

using decay products to monitor intakes and doses <strong>of</strong> the parent radionuclide.<br />

Soluble (dissociated) material<br />

(166) The behaviour <strong>of</strong> soluble or dissolved material (specifically the rate <strong>of</strong> uptake<br />

to blood) <strong>of</strong> decay products formed in the respiratory tract can be expected to depend<br />

on the element <strong>of</strong> which the decay product formed is an isotope. As discussed above,<br />

for soluble (Type F) materials the rapid dissolution rate, sr, represents the overall<br />

absorption from the respiratory tract to blood and is element-specific for many<br />

elements. Hence, when a Type F material is deposited in the respiratory tract, the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> sr for a decay product formed would be expected to be that <strong>of</strong> the element<br />

formed ('independent kinetics'), rather than following that <strong>of</strong> the parent ('shared<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!