Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2546<br />
2547<br />
2548<br />
2549<br />
2550<br />
2551<br />
2552<br />
2553<br />
2554<br />
2555<br />
2556<br />
2557<br />
2558<br />
2559<br />
2560<br />
2561<br />
2562<br />
2563<br />
2564<br />
2565<br />
2566<br />
2567<br />
2568<br />
2569<br />
2570<br />
2571<br />
2572<br />
2573<br />
2574<br />
2575<br />
2576<br />
2577<br />
2578<br />
2579<br />
2580<br />
2581<br />
2582<br />
2583<br />
2584<br />
2585<br />
2586<br />
2587<br />
2588<br />
2589<br />
2590<br />
2591<br />
DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />
similar to the fraction <strong>of</strong> 228 Th escaping by recoil, and therefore presumably similar to<br />
the fraction <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn escaping by recoil, since the recoil ranges <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn and 228 Th are<br />
similar (Griffith et al, 1980).<br />
(164) Johnson and Peterman (1984) developed a model to describe the emanation <strong>of</strong><br />
220<br />
Rn from ThO2 particles by alpha-particle recoil, and its exhalation from the lungs.<br />
They calculated that the fraction <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn atoms produced that escaped from particles<br />
(density 10 g cm –3 ) by recoil decreased from ~1.0 at 1 nm to ~0.5 at 10 nm and ~0.1<br />
at 0.5 µm diameter. The average fraction for an aerosol <strong>of</strong> AMAD 1 µm was<br />
calculated to be 0.2, which seems to be broadly consistent with the results derived by<br />
Griffith et al (1980).<br />
(165) Thus it seems that recoil is a mechanism that is at least as important as<br />
diffusion for emanation <strong>of</strong> radon from particles. It seems possible that it is the<br />
dominant mechanism, in which case for aerosols <strong>of</strong> AMAD about 1 µm there would<br />
be a release to lung air <strong>of</strong> ~10% <strong>of</strong> 222 Rn, 220 Rn or 219 Rn formed in particles in the<br />
lungs. Furthermore, alpha-particle recoil applies not only to radon formed as a decay<br />
product, but also to other decay products formed by alpha emission. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />
decay chains, this will result in successively lower activities <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the chain<br />
compared to the parent retained in relatively insoluble particles. There is some<br />
experimental evidence confirming this (see thorium inhalation section). However, it<br />
was considered impractical to implement loss <strong>of</strong> decay products by alpha recoil in the<br />
calculation <strong>of</strong> dose coefficients and bioassay functions in this series <strong>of</strong> documents.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the fractional loss for representative workplace aerosols would be<br />
complex, because it depends on the alpha decay energy, the size distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
deposited particles, and their shape and density: simplifying assumptions would be<br />
needed for practical implementation. Investigations conducted at by the Task Group<br />
into the effect <strong>of</strong> recoil on doses for inhaled 232 U and its decay products following<br />
inhalation in relatively insoluble particles found, as expected, that doses to the<br />
respiratory tract decreased and doses to tissues resulting from systemic uptake<br />
increased. However, there was little impact on effective dose in this example. The<br />
computational effort involved in identifying radionuclides formed by alpha decay, and<br />
partitioning the decay product atoms between a fraction remaining in the particle and<br />
a fraction escaping to lung fluids would be considerable, and was considered<br />
disproportionate to the benefit gained on a routine basis as in these documents. For<br />
calculation purposes the assumption that radon formed as a decay product within the<br />
respiratory tract escapes from the body at a rate <strong>of</strong> 100 d –1 is retained in this series <strong>of</strong><br />
documents. Nevertheless, this phenomenon should be borne in mind, especially when<br />
using decay products to monitor intakes and doses <strong>of</strong> the parent radionuclide.<br />
Soluble (dissociated) material<br />
(166) The behaviour <strong>of</strong> soluble or dissolved material (specifically the rate <strong>of</strong> uptake<br />
to blood) <strong>of</strong> decay products formed in the respiratory tract can be expected to depend<br />
on the element <strong>of</strong> which the decay product formed is an isotope. As discussed above,<br />
for soluble (Type F) materials the rapid dissolution rate, sr, represents the overall<br />
absorption from the respiratory tract to blood and is element-specific for many<br />
elements. Hence, when a Type F material is deposited in the respiratory tract, the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> sr for a decay product formed would be expected to be that <strong>of</strong> the element<br />
formed ('independent kinetics'), rather than following that <strong>of</strong> the parent ('shared<br />
72