03.06.2013 Views

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2501<br />

2502<br />

2503<br />

2504<br />

2505<br />

2506<br />

2507<br />

2508<br />

2509<br />

2510<br />

2511<br />

2512<br />

2513<br />

2514<br />

2515<br />

2516<br />

2517<br />

2518<br />

2519<br />

2520<br />

2521<br />

2522<br />

2523<br />

2524<br />

2525<br />

2526<br />

2527<br />

2528<br />

2529<br />

2530<br />

2531<br />

2532<br />

2533<br />

2534<br />

2535<br />

2536<br />

2537<br />

2538<br />

2539<br />

2540<br />

2541<br />

2542<br />

2543<br />

2544<br />

2545<br />

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />

(160) Generally the assumption applied to the slowly-dissolving fractions <strong>of</strong> Type M<br />

and Type S materials is that the dissolution <strong>of</strong> a decay product is determined by<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the particle matrix in which it is formed. Thus its dissolution parameter<br />

values should be those <strong>of</strong> the inhaled material.<br />

Emanation <strong>of</strong> radon and alpha recoil<br />

(161) In applying the HRTM, general exceptions have been made for noble gases<br />

formed as decay products (<strong>ICRP</strong>, 1994b, 1995c). Radioisotopes <strong>of</strong> xenon formed<br />

from the decay <strong>of</strong> iodine are assumed to escape from the body without decay, as in<br />

Publication 30 <strong>Part</strong> 1 (<strong>ICRP</strong>, 1979). This includes xenon formed in the respiratory<br />

tract. For calculation purposes it is assumed that radon formed as a decay product<br />

within the respiratory tract escapes from the body at a rate <strong>of</strong> 100 d -1 , in addition to<br />

other routes <strong>of</strong> removal (<strong>ICRP</strong>, 1995c). This rate was set as a convenient, arbitrary,<br />

rapid rate. The underlying assumption is that loss <strong>of</strong> radon (for example) is a<br />

continuous process such as diffusion. The three radon isotopes in the natural decay<br />

series: 222 Rn (radon), 220 Rn (thoron), and 219 Rn (actinon) have half-lives <strong>of</strong> about 3.8<br />

days, 56 seconds and 4 seconds, and therefore decay rates <strong>of</strong> about 0.18, 1100 and<br />

15,000 d –1 , respectively. Hence the assumption <strong>of</strong> a rate <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> 100 d –1 implies that<br />

nearly all 222 Rn escapes from the particles before it decays, about 10% <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn<br />

escapes, and nearly all 219 Rn decays within the particles. As described in the thorium<br />

inhalation section, studies which have compared thorium lung contents with exhaled<br />

thoron seem broadly consistent with the assumption that about 10% <strong>of</strong> thoron formed<br />

within particles in the lungs escapes, but measurements <strong>of</strong> emanation <strong>of</strong> radon ( 222 Rn)<br />

from uranium ore dust give values much lower than 100%.<br />

(162) Griffith et al (1980) developed a model to describe the retention <strong>of</strong> 232 U and<br />

its decay products (which include 228 Th) in the lungs following inhalation <strong>of</strong> ThO2 or<br />

UO2 particles. In addition to chemical dissolution, they considered emanation <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn<br />

from particles by diffusion, and emanation <strong>of</strong> decay products, including 220 Rn, as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the recoil <strong>of</strong> nuclei formed in alpha-particle decay. They presented equations<br />

to calculate fractional losses by diffusion and recoil as functions <strong>of</strong> particle size (but<br />

only for spherical particles). They calculated recoil ranges <strong>of</strong> about 0.05 µm for the<br />

decay products, (assuming a particle density <strong>of</strong> 10 g cm –3 ) and fractional losses by<br />

recoil emanation in the range 0.3 – 0.1, for aerosols with AMAD in the range 1 – 10<br />

µm. The calculated loss <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn from particles by diffusion emanation was difficult<br />

to predict, ranging from 0.03 to 0.7 depending on the assumed diffusion coefficient<br />

(10 –15 - 10 –11 cm 2 s –1 ).<br />

(163) Coombs and Cuddihy (1983) measured the fraction <strong>of</strong> 228 Th escaping by<br />

recoil, and the fraction <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn escaping by diffusion, from size-fractionated samples<br />

<strong>of</strong> ThO2 and uranium oxide (mixture <strong>of</strong> UO2.2 and U3O8) containing 1% 232 U. The<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> 228 Th escaping increased from ~0.07 for particles with AMAD 2.5 µm<br />

(count median diameter, CMD, ~1 µm) to ~0.3 for particles with AMAD 0.65 µm<br />

(CMD ~0.1 µm). This was in reasonable agreement with the model <strong>of</strong> Griffith et al<br />

(1980). Calculated recoil range was expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> recoil range multiplied by<br />

density, with values <strong>of</strong> ~20 µg cm –2 . The fraction <strong>of</strong> 220 Rn escaping by diffusion<br />

increased from ~0.07 for particles with AMAD 2.5 µm, to ~0.35 for particles with<br />

AMAD 0.65 µm, and gave a diffusion coefficient <strong>of</strong> ~3x10 –14 cm 2 s –1 . This was<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!