03.06.2013 Views

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2093<br />

2094<br />

2095<br />

2096<br />

2097<br />

2098<br />

2099<br />

2100<br />

2101<br />

2102<br />

2103<br />

2104<br />

2105<br />

2106<br />

2107<br />

2108<br />

2109<br />

2110<br />

2111<br />

2112<br />

2113<br />

2114<br />

2115<br />

2116<br />

2117<br />

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />

Table 4 Sources <strong>of</strong> data on thoracic retention used in Figure 7<br />

COBALT URANIUM PLUTONIUM<br />

Co1 Newton and Rundo<br />

(1971)<br />

U1 Ronen (1969) Pu1 Newton et al (1983)<br />

Co2 Gupton and Brown<br />

(1972)<br />

U2 Saxby et al (1964) Pu2 Ramsden (1976)<br />

Co3 Raghavendran et al U3 Rundo (1965) Pu3 Ramsden et al (1978);<br />

(1978)<br />

Ramsden (1984)<br />

Co4 Ramsden (1984) U4 Schultz (1966) Pu4 Bihl et al (1988a,b,c)<br />

Co5 Davis et al (2007) U5 Scott and West (1967) Pu5 Foster (1991)<br />

U6 West and Scott (1966) Pu6 ORAUT (2007)<br />

CERIUM U7 West and Scott (1969) Pu7 Carbaugh and La Bone<br />

(2003)<br />

Ce1 Tyler and Lister<br />

(1973)<br />

U8 West et al (1979)<br />

U9 Crawford-Brown and<br />

Wilson (1984)<br />

AMERICIUM<br />

TANTALUM U10 Kvasnicka (1987) Am1 Fry (1976)<br />

Ta1 Newton (1977) U11 Price (1989) Am2 Toohey and Essling<br />

(1980)<br />

Am3 Newton et al (1983)<br />

195<br />

Au-LABELLED<br />

Am4 Wernli and Eikenberg<br />

TEFLON<br />

T1 Philipson et al (1996)<br />

(2007)<br />

(123) A review <strong>of</strong> long-term lung retention data has therefore been conducted<br />

(Gregoratto et al, 2010). Three other major relevant studies were identified that were<br />

published since the HRTM was finalised. Their results, together with those on which<br />

the HRTM was based, were used to develop a new compartment model <strong>of</strong> particle<br />

transport from the AI region.<br />

(124) Philipson et al (1996) followed lung retention in 10 volunteers for about 3<br />

years after inhalation <strong>of</strong> 195 Au-labelled Teflon particles. The duration <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

was about three times longer than for the experiments available when the HRTM was<br />

developed, and it seems likely that there was less leakage <strong>of</strong> the radioactive label from<br />

the test particles. Lung retention has been followed for over thirty years in workers<br />

who inhaled plutonium oxide during a fire at the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) in October<br />

1965 (Mann and Kirchner, 1967; ORAUT 2007): another group who should be<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> nuclear industry workers (Gregoratto et al, 2010). Kuempel et al<br />

(2001) developed a model <strong>of</strong> particle retention in the AI region that is both<br />

physiologically more realistic and simpler than that in the original HRTM. Instead <strong>of</strong><br />

the three AI compartments in the HRTM, it has an alveolar compartment which clears<br />

both to the bronchial tree and to an interstitial compartment which clears to lymph<br />

nodes. This model was applied to a group <strong>of</strong> U.S. coal miners with exposure histories<br />

from which particle mass deposition rates could be assessed, and autopsy<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> dust concentration in lung (and also for lymph nodes in about 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> cases). The model was considered to be the simplest consistent with the data and<br />

no evidence was found for impaired clearance at high lung loadings over the range<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!