03.06.2013 Views

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1868<br />

1869<br />

1870<br />

1871<br />

1872<br />

1873<br />

1874<br />

1875<br />

1876<br />

1877<br />

1878<br />

1879<br />

1880<br />

1881<br />

1882<br />

1883<br />

1884<br />

1885<br />

1886<br />

1887<br />

1888<br />

1889<br />

1890<br />

1891<br />

1892<br />

1893<br />

1894<br />

Anterior nasal<br />

Posterior nasal,<br />

pharynx, larynx<br />

Bronchial<br />

Bronchiolar<br />

Alveolarinterstitial<br />

Extrathoracic<br />

LNTH<br />

Thoracic<br />

0.001<br />

0.001<br />

0.001<br />

0.00003<br />

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />

Figure 6. Revised compartment model representing time-dependent particle transport from<br />

each respiratory tract region. Rates shown alongside arrows are reference values in units <strong>of</strong><br />

d –1 . It is assumed that 0.2% <strong>of</strong> material deposited in regions ET2, BB and bb is retained in the<br />

airway wall (ETseq, BBseq and bbseq respectively).<br />

<strong>Part</strong>icle transport: extrathoracic airways<br />

BBseq<br />

bbseq<br />

(102) The Publication 66 model assumed that <strong>of</strong> material deposited in the ET<br />

airways, about 50% deposits in ET1 (Figure 5), which is cleared by nose blowing at a<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 1 d –1 , and the rest deposits in ET2, which clears to the GI tract at a rate <strong>of</strong> 100<br />

d –1 . However, there was little information available to quantify clearance from ET1. It<br />

was recognised that the fraction deposited in ET1 was generally greater than that in<br />

ET2 and that there was slow transfer from ET1 to ET2, but insufficient information<br />

was available to quantify these factors and transfer rates. In experiments intended to<br />

address this deficiency, subjects inhaled 1.5-, 3- or 6-µm aerodynamic diameter (dae)<br />

radiolabelled insoluble particles through the nose while sitting at rest or performing<br />

light exercise (Smith et al, 2002, 2011). Retention in the nasal airways and clearance<br />

by voluntary nose blowing were followed until at least 95% <strong>of</strong> the initial ET deposit<br />

(IETD) had cleared (typically about 2 days). On average, 19% IETD was cleared by<br />

nose blowing (geometric mean time for 50% clearance was 8 hours), and the rest was<br />

cleared to the alimentary tract: 15% within a few minutes, 21% between a few<br />

minutes and an hour, and 45% on a similar time-scale to the fraction cleared by noseblowing.<br />

Measurements in this study, and the previous studies on which the original<br />

model was based, indicate that most particles that have not cleared within an hour are<br />

retained in the anterior nasal passage.<br />

54<br />

INT<br />

0.001<br />

1.5<br />

10<br />

0.2<br />

0.002<br />

ET1<br />

LNET ETseq ET’2<br />

BB’<br />

bb’<br />

ALV<br />

0.6<br />

100<br />

Environment<br />

Oesophagus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!