Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4805<br />
4806<br />
4807<br />
4808<br />
4809<br />
4810<br />
4811<br />
4812<br />
4813<br />
4814<br />
4815<br />
4816<br />
4817<br />
4818<br />
4819<br />
4820<br />
4821<br />
4822<br />
4823<br />
4824<br />
4825<br />
4826<br />
4827<br />
4828<br />
4829<br />
4830<br />
4831<br />
4832<br />
4833<br />
4834<br />
4835<br />
4836<br />
4837<br />
4838<br />
4839<br />
4840<br />
4841<br />
4842<br />
4843<br />
4844<br />
4845<br />
4846<br />
4847<br />
4848<br />
4849<br />
4850<br />
DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />
experimental and statistical problems in the data as well as the logical basis for<br />
extrapolation <strong>of</strong> those particular data to humans. Relatively high confidence might be<br />
placed in a model value based on animal data if fairly extensive interspecies<br />
comparisons have been made and include observations on the species expected to be<br />
most human-like; these comparisons suggest a strong basis for interspecies<br />
extrapolation, either because the data are species-invariant or because the<br />
physiological processes governing the biokinetics <strong>of</strong> the element in different species<br />
have been reasonably well established; the model structure allows meaningful<br />
extrapolation to man, usually on the basis <strong>of</strong> physiological processes; and such<br />
processes have been well quantified in humans (i.e., the central value for humans has<br />
been reasonably well established). A fairly wide uncertainty interval is indicated if<br />
data are available only for species that frequently exhibit qualitative differences from<br />
man (e.g., if data were available only for rats) or if no meaningful basis for<br />
extrapolation to man has been established with regard to the quantity <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
Whatever the quality <strong>of</strong> the animal data, the uncertainty interval should reflect the fact<br />
that some confidence in the predictive strength <strong>of</strong> the data is lost when the data are<br />
extrapolated across species.<br />
Uncertainty in inter-element extrapolation <strong>of</strong> biokinetic data<br />
(385) Biokinetic models for elements <strong>of</strong>ten are constructed partly or wholly from<br />
data for chemically similar elements, on the basis <strong>of</strong> empirical evidence that chemical<br />
analogues <strong>of</strong>ten exhibit close physiological similarities. For example, the alkaline<br />
earth elements, calcium, strontium, barium, and radium, exhibit many physiological<br />
as well as chemical similarities (<strong>ICRP</strong>, 1993, 1995a), and the alkali metals rubidium<br />
and caesium closely follow the movement <strong>of</strong> their chemical analogue, potassium.<br />
(386) There are, however, counterexamples to the premise that chemical analogues<br />
are also physiological analogues. For example, the alkali metals potassium and<br />
sodium share close physical and chemical similarities but exhibit diametrically<br />
opposite behaviours in the body, with potassium being primarily an intracellular<br />
element and sodium being primarily an extracellular element.<br />
(387) Moreover, chemically similar elements that behave in a qualitatively similar<br />
fashion in the body may exhibit quite different kinetics. For example, caesium<br />
appears to follow the behaviour <strong>of</strong> potassium in the body in a qualitative sense but is<br />
distributed somewhat differently from potassium at early times after intake and<br />
exhibits a substantially longer whole-body retention time.<br />
(388) The level <strong>of</strong> confidence that can be placed in a model value based on human<br />
data for a chemically similar element depends on the quality and completeness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
data for the analogue, as well as the expected strength <strong>of</strong> the analogy for the given<br />
situation. Whatever the quality <strong>of</strong> the data for the chemical analogue, the confidence<br />
interval should reflect the fact that some confidence in the predictive strength <strong>of</strong> the<br />
data is lost when the data are extrapolated across elements.<br />
(389) The strength <strong>of</strong> the chemical analogy for a given element depends largely on<br />
the extent to which the chemically similar elements have also been found to be<br />
physiologically similar. That is, the analogy would be considered strong for a pair <strong>of</strong><br />
elements if a relatively large set <strong>of</strong> experimental data indicate that these elements<br />
have essentially the same qualitative behaviour in the body and their quantitative<br />
132