Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3819<br />
3820<br />
3821<br />
3822<br />
3823<br />
3824<br />
3825<br />
3826<br />
3827<br />
3828<br />
3829<br />
3830<br />
3831<br />
3832<br />
3833<br />
3834<br />
3835<br />
3836<br />
3837<br />
3838<br />
3839<br />
3840<br />
3841<br />
3842<br />
3843<br />
3844<br />
3845<br />
3846<br />
3847<br />
3848<br />
3849<br />
3850<br />
3851<br />
3852<br />
3853<br />
3854<br />
3855<br />
3856<br />
3857<br />
3858<br />
3859<br />
3860<br />
3861<br />
3862<br />
3863<br />
3864<br />
5.3.1 Routine Monitoring<br />
DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />
(278) Routine monitoring programmes may involve only one type <strong>of</strong> measurement<br />
or a combination <strong>of</strong> techniques, depending on the sensitivity that can be achieved. For<br />
some radionuclides, only one measurement technique is practical, e.g. urine<br />
monitoring for assessment <strong>of</strong> intakes <strong>of</strong> tritium. For radionuclides such as plutonium<br />
isotopes that present difficulties for both measurement and interpretation, various<br />
techniques may have to be employed. If different methods <strong>of</strong> adequate sensitivity are<br />
available, the general order <strong>of</strong> preference (highest first) in terms <strong>of</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />
interpretation is:<br />
body activity measurements;<br />
excreta analysis;<br />
exposure monitoring in the workplace.<br />
(279) These techniques are, in general, complementary and not mutually exclusive.<br />
For example, results <strong>of</strong> monitoring <strong>of</strong> the working environment (area monitoring) can<br />
provide early indication <strong>of</strong> worker exposure, and can therefore be used to trigger<br />
special bioassay monitoring, or they may provide information that assists in<br />
interpreting the results <strong>of</strong> individual monitoring, e.g. information on airborne activity,<br />
particle size, chemical form and solubility, and time <strong>of</strong> intake.<br />
(280) Urine monitoring provides a measure <strong>of</strong> systemic uptake to organs and tissues<br />
after inhalation and ingestion for those elements for which urine excretion rates are<br />
sufficiently high. It can also be used to determine the fraction <strong>of</strong> activity deposited in<br />
a wound site that transfers to the systemic circulation.<br />
(281) Caution should be exercised in using urine monitoring for materials that are<br />
absorbed relatively slowly from the respiratory tract (i.e. 'insoluble' materials). In<br />
these circumstances, it is usually the lung dose that makes the greatest contribution to<br />
effective dose, and uncertainties on the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the absorption characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
the material can result in significant errors in assessed dose. For insoluble materials,<br />
significant improvements in sensitivity can be achieved by using faecal monitoring in<br />
addition to urine monitoring. This is because significant fractions <strong>of</strong> insoluble<br />
material deposited in both the extrathoracic airways and the lungs are cleared via the<br />
gastro-intestinal tract to faeces.<br />
(282) Interpretation <strong>of</strong> faecal monitoring data needs to take account <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong><br />
factors that are specific to the faecal excretion pathway. Excretion <strong>of</strong> faeces is a<br />
discrete process (even though it is usually modelled using first-order kinetics), and so<br />
it is advisable to sum the amounts excreted over a 3-day period to obtain a daily<br />
excretion rate.<br />
(283) In the workplace, individuals may be exposed to a variety <strong>of</strong> radionuclides,<br />
such as those that occur in fuel reprocessing or manufacturing plants. In such<br />
circumstances it may be feasible to use a radionuclide that is readily detectable to<br />
assess the potential for exposure to other radionuclides in the plant. For example<br />
screening for 144 Ce could be used to assess the potential for exposure to actinides<br />
(Doerfel et al, 2008).<br />
(284) The results <strong>of</strong> workplace monitoring for air contamination may sometimes be<br />
used to estimate individual intakes if individual monitoring is not feasible. However<br />
the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> air sampling measurements in terms <strong>of</strong> intake is<br />
subject to much greater uncertainty and bias.<br />
109