03.06.2013 Views

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides Part 1 - ICRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3819<br />

3820<br />

3821<br />

3822<br />

3823<br />

3824<br />

3825<br />

3826<br />

3827<br />

3828<br />

3829<br />

3830<br />

3831<br />

3832<br />

3833<br />

3834<br />

3835<br />

3836<br />

3837<br />

3838<br />

3839<br />

3840<br />

3841<br />

3842<br />

3843<br />

3844<br />

3845<br />

3846<br />

3847<br />

3848<br />

3849<br />

3850<br />

3851<br />

3852<br />

3853<br />

3854<br />

3855<br />

3856<br />

3857<br />

3858<br />

3859<br />

3860<br />

3861<br />

3862<br />

3863<br />

3864<br />

5.3.1 Routine Monitoring<br />

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION<br />

(278) Routine monitoring programmes may involve only one type <strong>of</strong> measurement<br />

or a combination <strong>of</strong> techniques, depending on the sensitivity that can be achieved. For<br />

some radionuclides, only one measurement technique is practical, e.g. urine<br />

monitoring for assessment <strong>of</strong> intakes <strong>of</strong> tritium. For radionuclides such as plutonium<br />

isotopes that present difficulties for both measurement and interpretation, various<br />

techniques may have to be employed. If different methods <strong>of</strong> adequate sensitivity are<br />

available, the general order <strong>of</strong> preference (highest first) in terms <strong>of</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

interpretation is:<br />

body activity measurements;<br />

excreta analysis;<br />

exposure monitoring in the workplace.<br />

(279) These techniques are, in general, complementary and not mutually exclusive.<br />

For example, results <strong>of</strong> monitoring <strong>of</strong> the working environment (area monitoring) can<br />

provide early indication <strong>of</strong> worker exposure, and can therefore be used to trigger<br />

special bioassay monitoring, or they may provide information that assists in<br />

interpreting the results <strong>of</strong> individual monitoring, e.g. information on airborne activity,<br />

particle size, chemical form and solubility, and time <strong>of</strong> intake.<br />

(280) Urine monitoring provides a measure <strong>of</strong> systemic uptake to organs and tissues<br />

after inhalation and ingestion for those elements for which urine excretion rates are<br />

sufficiently high. It can also be used to determine the fraction <strong>of</strong> activity deposited in<br />

a wound site that transfers to the systemic circulation.<br />

(281) Caution should be exercised in using urine monitoring for materials that are<br />

absorbed relatively slowly from the respiratory tract (i.e. 'insoluble' materials). In<br />

these circumstances, it is usually the lung dose that makes the greatest contribution to<br />

effective dose, and uncertainties on the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the absorption characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the material can result in significant errors in assessed dose. For insoluble materials,<br />

significant improvements in sensitivity can be achieved by using faecal monitoring in<br />

addition to urine monitoring. This is because significant fractions <strong>of</strong> insoluble<br />

material deposited in both the extrathoracic airways and the lungs are cleared via the<br />

gastro-intestinal tract to faeces.<br />

(282) Interpretation <strong>of</strong> faecal monitoring data needs to take account <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong><br />

factors that are specific to the faecal excretion pathway. Excretion <strong>of</strong> faeces is a<br />

discrete process (even though it is usually modelled using first-order kinetics), and so<br />

it is advisable to sum the amounts excreted over a 3-day period to obtain a daily<br />

excretion rate.<br />

(283) In the workplace, individuals may be exposed to a variety <strong>of</strong> radionuclides,<br />

such as those that occur in fuel reprocessing or manufacturing plants. In such<br />

circumstances it may be feasible to use a radionuclide that is readily detectable to<br />

assess the potential for exposure to other radionuclides in the plant. For example<br />

screening for 144 Ce could be used to assess the potential for exposure to actinides<br />

(Doerfel et al, 2008).<br />

(284) The results <strong>of</strong> workplace monitoring for air contamination may sometimes be<br />

used to estimate individual intakes if individual monitoring is not feasible. However<br />

the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> air sampling measurements in terms <strong>of</strong> intake is<br />

subject to much greater uncertainty and bias.<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!