budgetary implementation
budgetary implementation budgetary implementation
Chart 2: Execution of commitments and payments (outturn, including of appropriations carried forward) from 1994 to 2012 (EUR million) Chart 3 shows the evolution of the overall RAL for the Structural Funds (all periods combined) since 1994 resulting from the evolution of commitments and payments over the years. Chart 3: Implementation of commitments and payments and outstanding commitments at the end of each year (EUR million) - 48 -
ANNEX 5: HISTORIC ANALYSIS OF MEMBER STATES PAYMENT FORECASTS Table 1 gives an overview of the aggregate results of the forecasting exercise since 2001 thus showing the evolution of the forecasting performance over time. Up to 2011 the forecast error was expressed as a percentage of payment execution while from 2012 onwards, following the change in methodology due to the lack of payment appropriations (see Chapter 2.5), the forecast error will be expressed as a percentage of claims submitted. Thus, in 2012 the total relative forecast error for the 2007-2013 programmes is 15%. This means that for every EUR 100 of payments claims actually submitted in 2012, the Member States had forecasted they would claim EUR 115. In absolute terms, the error was EUR 7.8 billion. - 49 -
- Page 1: Analysis of the budgetary implement
- Page 4 and 5: NOTE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BUDGET IMPLEMEN
- Page 8 and 9: 1 BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION IN 2012 1.1
- Page 10 and 11: 1.2 OUTSTANDING COMMITMENTS IN 2012
- Page 12 and 13: 1.3 TRANSFERS MADE IN 2012 In 2012
- Page 14 and 15: Chart 4: Monthly pattern of cumulat
- Page 16 and 17: Financial Framework. Implementation
- Page 18 and 19: second half of December. The high p
- Page 20 and 21: Chart 6: Cumulative execution of ad
- Page 22 and 23: The EU-12 countries accounted for 5
- Page 24 and 25: Any amounts at risk, calculated as
- Page 26 and 27: counterbalanced the general trend o
- Page 28 and 29: 3 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2000-2006 P
- Page 30 and 31: Chart 10: Progress of closure of to
- Page 32 and 33: allocation. Nine EU-15 Member State
- Page 34 and 35: Chart 15: Total EU-10 execution at
- Page 36 and 37: By Fund, as of the end of 2012, the
- Page 38 and 39: Table 10: Outstanding commitments f
- Page 40 and 41: 4.2 Clearance of outstanding commit
- Page 42 and 43: OVERVIEW OF CHARTS Chart 1: Outstan
- Page 44 and 45: ANNEXES ANNEX 1: IMPLEMENTATION BY
- Page 46 and 47: ANNEX 1 : IMPLEMENTATION BY BUDGET
- Page 48 and 49: ANNEX 3: N+2/N+3 DECOMMITMENTS IN 2
- Page 52 and 53: Table 1: Overall forecasting errors
- Page 54: ANNEX 7: REFERENCES More informatio
ANNEX 5: HISTORIC ANALYSIS OF MEMBER STATES PAYMENT FORECASTS<br />
Table 1 gives an overview of the aggregate results of the forecasting exercise since 2001 thus<br />
showing the evolution of the forecasting performance over time.<br />
Up to 2011 the forecast error was expressed as a percentage of payment execution while from<br />
2012 onwards, following the change in methodology due to the lack of payment<br />
appropriations (see Chapter 2.5), the forecast error will be expressed as a percentage of claims<br />
submitted.<br />
Thus, in 2012 the total relative forecast error for the 2007-2013 programmes is 15%. This<br />
means that for every EUR 100 of payments claims actually submitted in 2012, the Member<br />
States had forecasted they would claim EUR 115. In absolute terms, the error was EUR 7.8<br />
billion.<br />
- 49 -
Change language