budgetary implementation
budgetary implementation
budgetary implementation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
It should be noted that the 2010-2012 closure de-commitments can be:<br />
a) final closure de-commitments when the final commitment is brought to zero, any balance<br />
due is paid and therefore the programmes closed from the <strong>budgetary</strong> point of view; the<br />
Commission has already analysed the certified expenditure (see also chapter 3.1 above) or<br />
b) preliminary closure de-commitments representing the difference between the outstanding<br />
commitments and the amount of the certified expenditure declared together with the closure<br />
documents. The Commission is still in the process of analysing the certified expenditure; in<br />
the situation of a partial approval of the certified expenditure, the amount not approved will<br />
also be de-committed later.<br />
In order to measure the effect of de-commitments, the performance indicator used is the share<br />
of total accumulated n+2 de-commitments (from 2003 to 2008) on top of which are added the<br />
2010, 2011 and 2012 closure de-commitments, in the value of total commitments (2000-<br />
2006).<br />
The average de-commitments so far are equivalent to 1.59% of the total commitments of the<br />
period 2000-06, (n+2: 0.56%, closure: 1.03%). In absolute terms the cumulative amount of<br />
decommitments has reached EUR 3.6 billion so far (of which EUR 1.3 billion were n+2<br />
decommitments and another EUR 2.3 billion were closure decommitments).<br />
Using the indicator of decommitments relative to total commitments, the following 3 charts<br />
give the (cumulative) situation by Member State, Fund and Objective, respectively.<br />
Chart 16: Relative significance of the cumulative de-commitments up to the end of 2012, by Member State<br />
33