02.06.2013 Views

ludUO

ludUO

ludUO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

318 Furthermore, in view of the charged environment in the province these things<br />

must not be seen as mere law and order issues. HRCP welcomes the<br />

government’s decision to hold a judicial probe and very much hopes that<br />

unlike earlier probes the findings of this one would be made public.”<br />

HRCP stands<br />

Political participation<br />

February 27: HRCP expressed alarm at the deviations from normal sensible<br />

behaviour that were witnessed during by-elections held in ten constituencies<br />

and said that those had pointed to the dangers that could haunt the country<br />

during the general election in 2013. The Commission pointed out in particular<br />

preventing women from voting, violence upon polling staff, unrestricted display<br />

of firearms and firing around polling booths and employment of police personnel<br />

for interference in legitimate balloting. “All these events reported during this<br />

limited exercise must be thoroughly probed and no quarters given to any<br />

offender party, otherwise the dream of free and fair elections would forever<br />

remain elusive. The remedy lies not only with the Election Commission—<br />

although it has the first responsibility in the presence of abundant evidence of<br />

the infractions—but also with the government and the political parties and<br />

above all with the people who have to demonstrate responsibility and<br />

commitment to the democratic principle rather than to petty interests or clan<br />

loyalty,” the Commission added.<br />

Democratic rights and political conditions<br />

April 26: While commenting on the Supreme Court verdict in the contempt<br />

case against the Prime Minister, HRCP called for an end to confrontation<br />

between the state organs. In a statement the commission said: “While it is<br />

gratifying to note that the Supreme Court held its hand while sentencing Prime<br />

Minister Gilani, nobody can be happy that matters came to the point that the<br />

head of an elected government was convicted of and sentenced for contempt<br />

of court and that the court could not avoid making its decision controversial.<br />

That the situation resulted from the maximal and rigid positions taken by the<br />

two essential pillars of the state – the executive and the judiciary – can only be<br />

regretted. The executive earned no credit by apparently defying the apex court’s<br />

orders, which must be accepted even when they do not seem to be correct or<br />

sound, and only time will tell what cause has been promoted by the judiciary<br />

by belabouring the executive, out of the hundreds of issues on which it is<br />

liable to be chastised, on the issue of its own contempt. It is necessary to point<br />

out that Pakistan needs both justice and democracy in ample measure and that<br />

justice without democracy will be as inadequate a dispensation as democracy<br />

without justice. The people who have been kept on tenterhooks for week after<br />

week only wish to see the end of a confrontation that is looking more and<br />

more ungainly. They must not be disappointed.”<br />

June 20: HRCP called the removal of Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani<br />

a sad occasion in a country where democratic traditions have perpetually been

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!