02.06.2013 Views

ludUO

ludUO

ludUO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 had been closed.<br />

Administration of justice<br />

NRO case & PM’s conviction<br />

On the third day of the year 2012 the Supreme Court launched the process<br />

of ensuring implementation of its verdict on the National Reconciliation<br />

Ordinance (NRO) of December 16, 2009, which led to Yousaf Raza Gilani’s<br />

conviction for contempt and his exit from the office of the Prime Minister. His<br />

successor, Raja Pervez Ashraf, escaped a similar fate as a result of a last<br />

minute compromise.<br />

The main issue in the case turned out to be the direction to the Prime<br />

Minister, as the federation’s chief executive, to write a letter to the Swiss<br />

authorities for reopening the cases against President Asif Ali Zardari.<br />

On January 03 the Supreme Court (a 5-member bench headed by Justice<br />

Asif Saeed Khosa) told the government to implement its order by January 10,<br />

failing which the court would itself determine its course of action. On the next<br />

hearing (January 10) the court passed a short order whereby the Chief Justice<br />

was requested to create a larger bench to consider what action should be<br />

taken against those who had wilfully defied the court’s order of 2009.<br />

The whole case against the Prime Minister rested on paragraph 178 of the<br />

Supreme Court judgment of December 16, 2009 in Mobashir Hassan vs<br />

Federation. This paragraph ordered the federal government and other concerned<br />

authorities to take immediate steps to seek revival of the case in Switzerland<br />

against Asif Ali Zardari that had been closed on the basis of a letter written by<br />

Malik Mohammad Qayyum, the then Attorney-General.<br />

The court observed that “In such a case of a brazen failure or refusal of<br />

the federal government to obey… the buck stops at the office of the chief<br />

executive of the federation, i.e., the Prime Minister.”<br />

The court said six options were<br />

available to it:<br />

1. Hand down a declaration<br />

that may affect the Prime Minister’s<br />

qualification to be chosen as a member<br />

of parliament. Similar action possible for<br />

apparent breach of oath against the<br />

President and the Law Minister.<br />

2. Initiate contempt of court<br />

proceeding against the Prime Minister,<br />

the law minister and the law secretary<br />

for failing or refusing to implement the<br />

NRO judgment.<br />

3. Appoint a commission to<br />

Gilani: ousted for contempt.<br />

execute the relevant parts of the NRO

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!