02.06.2013 Views

ludUO

ludUO

ludUO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

epatriation. While voluntary repatriation is the preferred durable solution for<br />

refugees worldwide, it certainly is not the only one. Other acknowledged<br />

durable solutions include integration in the host country, or resettlement. Few<br />

Afghans in Pakistan had a shot at either of the two options or at a more<br />

permanent form of relief in the short term.<br />

The incentive<br />

Under the UNHCR’s repatriation assistance programme, registered refugees<br />

coming back to Afghanistan received an average of US $150 per person to<br />

cover transportation as well as the initial cost of settling back home. In late<br />

October, UNHCR boosted incentives for registered Afghans returning to their<br />

homeland from Pakistan during the months of November and December. The<br />

enhanced return package included non-food items (jerry cans, heavy duty<br />

plastic buckets, soap, mosquito nets, sleeping mats, thermal fleece blankets,<br />

kitchen sets, plastic tarpaulins, quilts and sanitary cloth) and free transportation<br />

from the Voluntary Repatriation Centre (VRC) in Pakistan to the Encashment<br />

Centres in Afghanistan. But despite the incentives and pressure to return, the<br />

vast majority remained reluctant to return because of conflict and poverty. By<br />

repatriating, registered Afghans gave up their protected status in Pakistan. If<br />

they returned to Pakistan without a visa afterwards they were to be treated as<br />

illegal immigrants, in the same manner as around one million unregistered<br />

Afghans in Pakistan. Some Afghans were reported to have told media<br />

organisations that they did not want to risk whatever little they had in Pakistan<br />

for an uncertain future in Afghanistan. Other stated that they would stay in<br />

Pakistan until the government expelled them.<br />

‘The undesirables’<br />

The public sentiment seemed to have turned against the Afghans’ continued<br />

presence in Pakistan and amid rising lawlessness and instances of terrorism<br />

demands grew for Afghans’ return, particularly from communities and from<br />

authorities in areas where large Afghan settlements were located. Instances of<br />

demonisation of the Afghans as a threat to national security continued to<br />

surface. The demand for repatriation of the Afghans was not always because<br />

of perceived involvement of Afghans in acts of terrorism and crime, but also<br />

amid reports of any mistreatment or violence that Pakistani workers faced in<br />

Afghanistan at the hands of the Afghan authorities.<br />

A large number of residents in Mansehra district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa<br />

held a demonstration in December to demand that the Afghan refugees should<br />

be repatriated immediately. They said that while Pakistan had offered shelter<br />

to millions of Afghan refugees, Pakistani labourers were being killed in<br />

Afghanistan. They accused the Afghans of occupying businesses and not<br />

paying taxes. They demanded that the government should restrict the refugees<br />

to their camps until the schedule for their departure was announced. They<br />

277<br />

State of Human Rights in 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!