02.06.2013 Views

ludUO

ludUO

ludUO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128<br />

Freedom of expression<br />

in December, a move that received mixed response from different quarters of<br />

society. The Act would allow security agencies in Pakistan to tap into private<br />

communications of citizens in order to catch terrorists. The federal cabinet<br />

defended the law by claiming that security agencies needed modern techniques<br />

and devices for investigation and to be able to track electronic communications.<br />

However, human rights organisations slammed the move as a serious<br />

curtailment of citizen’s right to privacy. The Act gave security agencies the<br />

right to tap phones, calls, emails, SMS, internet connection and even conduct<br />

human intelligence on suspicious individuals. Such powers carried huge potential<br />

for misuse by security agencies for personal or political purposes. The Act<br />

also failed to define the term terrorism which could potentially be used vaguely<br />

for personal gains. The opposition tried to limit the applicability of the Act only<br />

to proceedings before the Anti-Terrorism Court but could not persuade the<br />

treasury benches.<br />

Social media and the web<br />

An ever increasing number of Pakistanis gained access to social media<br />

and the Internet. According to official Facebook statistics, the number of<br />

Facebook users in Pakistan grew from 1.8 million at the end of 2011 to 3.6<br />

million in 2012 alone. Millions of young adults took to Twitter and Facebook<br />

to share information. The flow of information on the Internet is considered to<br />

be free and unrestricted but this was not the case in Pakistan. The video<br />

sharing website YouTube was banned in Pakistan in September as a<br />

consequence of a video uploaded there that was widely considered to be<br />

denigrating Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The video triggered mass protests<br />

and condemnation all across the Muslim world but the tensions simmered<br />

away within a month or so. In Pakistan, however, the ban on YouTube was<br />

imposed with the condition that it shall stay in place till the video was taken<br />

down. YouTube failed to comply and, consequently, the ban was in place until<br />

the end of 2012. Numerous<br />

artists, civil society and citizens<br />

protested against this ban,<br />

labeling it a gross violation of<br />

the right of freedom of<br />

expression and access to<br />

information for the citizens of<br />

Pakistan.<br />

Banning websites was not<br />

a new phenomenon in Pakistan<br />

though. The government had<br />

been accused for many years<br />

for banning websites of Baloch<br />

nationalists. Baloch Hal, the first<br />

The plug was pulled on YouTube.<br />

English language Baloch news

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!