02.06.2013 Views

study on economic partnership projects

study on economic partnership projects

study on economic partnership projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 6-2 Comparis<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g Alternatives of C<strong>on</strong>tract Packages<br />

Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Item Alternative No. 1 Alternative No. 2 Alternative No. 3<br />

Schematic Plan<br />

View<br />

No. of<br />

Packages<br />

Manageability<br />

Interference<br />

between<br />

packages<br />

Qualificati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />

Attractiveness<br />

of packages<br />

Evaluati<strong>on</strong><br />

Source: Study Team<br />

Approach Road<br />

1,260m<br />

Approach<br />

Bridge<br />

720m<br />

Package No.1<br />

Main bridge<br />

1,030m<br />

Approach<br />

Bridge<br />

720m<br />

C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> schedule can be managed<br />

comprehensively, which is good for overall<br />

project implementati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The problems c<strong>on</strong>cerning interference can be<br />

solved as part of the scope of <strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>tractor.<br />

Only the c<strong>on</strong>sortiums of big general c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />

could qualify.<br />

Attractive <strong>on</strong>ly for big general c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />

because of large c<strong>on</strong>tract amount.<br />

Approach<br />

Road<br />

320m<br />

6-4<br />

Approach Road<br />

1,260m<br />

Approach<br />

Bridge<br />

720m<br />

Main bridge<br />

1,030m<br />

Package No.1 Package No.2<br />

One (1) Three (3) Three (3)<br />

○<br />

○<br />

△<br />

△<br />

It is difficult to c<strong>on</strong>trol the overall c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />

schedule as the completi<strong>on</strong> of each package<br />

varies.<br />

Interference of c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> works with<br />

Package No. 2 is expected in case a comm<strong>on</strong><br />

temporary road is used<br />

Only c<strong>on</strong>sortiums of big general c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />

could qualify; however, amount of Package<br />

No. 2 under this alternative is expected to be<br />

less than that in Alternative No. 3.<br />

All packages have reas<strong>on</strong>able c<strong>on</strong>tract<br />

amounts in terms of road and bridge works<br />

△<br />

△<br />

△<br />

○<br />

Approach<br />

Bridge<br />

720m<br />

Approach<br />

Road<br />

320m<br />

Package No.3<br />

It is difficult to c<strong>on</strong>trol the overall c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />

schedule as the completi<strong>on</strong> of each package<br />

varies.<br />

Interference of c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> works with<br />

Package No. 2 is expected in case a comm<strong>on</strong><br />

temporary road is used<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tractors specializing in the type of<br />

c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> works could qualify. Only big<br />

general c<strong>on</strong>tractors of big c<strong>on</strong>sortiums could<br />

be qualified for Package No. 2.<br />

Package No. 1 and No. 3 are not attractive for<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tractors to bid because of relatively small<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tract amounts. They will also avoid high<br />

risks due to resettlement issues.<br />

Most Recommended ○ Recommended ○ Not Recommended △<br />

△<br />

△<br />

△<br />

×

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!