study on economic partnership projects
study on economic partnership projects
study on economic partnership projects
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 6-2 Comparis<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g Alternatives of C<strong>on</strong>tract Packages<br />
Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Item Alternative No. 1 Alternative No. 2 Alternative No. 3<br />
Schematic Plan<br />
View<br />
No. of<br />
Packages<br />
Manageability<br />
Interference<br />
between<br />
packages<br />
Qualificati<strong>on</strong> of<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />
Attractiveness<br />
of packages<br />
Evaluati<strong>on</strong><br />
Source: Study Team<br />
Approach Road<br />
1,260m<br />
Approach<br />
Bridge<br />
720m<br />
Package No.1<br />
Main bridge<br />
1,030m<br />
Approach<br />
Bridge<br />
720m<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> schedule can be managed<br />
comprehensively, which is good for overall<br />
project implementati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The problems c<strong>on</strong>cerning interference can be<br />
solved as part of the scope of <strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>tractor.<br />
Only the c<strong>on</strong>sortiums of big general c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />
could qualify.<br />
Attractive <strong>on</strong>ly for big general c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />
because of large c<strong>on</strong>tract amount.<br />
Approach<br />
Road<br />
320m<br />
6-4<br />
Approach Road<br />
1,260m<br />
Approach<br />
Bridge<br />
720m<br />
Main bridge<br />
1,030m<br />
Package No.1 Package No.2<br />
One (1) Three (3) Three (3)<br />
○<br />
○<br />
△<br />
△<br />
It is difficult to c<strong>on</strong>trol the overall c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
schedule as the completi<strong>on</strong> of each package<br />
varies.<br />
Interference of c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> works with<br />
Package No. 2 is expected in case a comm<strong>on</strong><br />
temporary road is used<br />
Only c<strong>on</strong>sortiums of big general c<strong>on</strong>tractors<br />
could qualify; however, amount of Package<br />
No. 2 under this alternative is expected to be<br />
less than that in Alternative No. 3.<br />
All packages have reas<strong>on</strong>able c<strong>on</strong>tract<br />
amounts in terms of road and bridge works<br />
△<br />
△<br />
△<br />
○<br />
Approach<br />
Bridge<br />
720m<br />
Approach<br />
Road<br />
320m<br />
Package No.3<br />
It is difficult to c<strong>on</strong>trol the overall c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
schedule as the completi<strong>on</strong> of each package<br />
varies.<br />
Interference of c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> works with<br />
Package No. 2 is expected in case a comm<strong>on</strong><br />
temporary road is used<br />
C<strong>on</strong>tractors specializing in the type of<br />
c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> works could qualify. Only big<br />
general c<strong>on</strong>tractors of big c<strong>on</strong>sortiums could<br />
be qualified for Package No. 2.<br />
Package No. 1 and No. 3 are not attractive for<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tractors to bid because of relatively small<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tract amounts. They will also avoid high<br />
risks due to resettlement issues.<br />
Most Recommended ○ Recommended ○ Not Recommended △<br />
△<br />
△<br />
△<br />
×