02.06.2013 Views

1987 Wetland Delineation Manual - The Wetlands Regulation Center

1987 Wetland Delineation Manual - The Wetlands Regulation Center

1987 Wetland Delineation Manual - The Wetlands Regulation Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Wetland</strong> Delination <strong>Manual</strong>, <strong>1987</strong> 111<br />

6.Q. Is there a map that goes with the regional indicators?<br />

A. Yes, the regional indicators of soil saturation continue to be developed and are being<br />

proposed for use with the manual for the four Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation<br />

Service main regions; Northeast, South, Midwest and West (see enclosed map).<br />

7.Q. Can the soils list be used as corroborative information with a secondary indicator for<br />

verification that the hydrology criterion is met?<br />

A. No, only the information listed can be used. Comments on the appropriateness of the<br />

information and suggestions for others should be provided during the comment period.<br />

8.Q. Can blackened leaves be used as hydrology indicator?<br />

A. No, only those listed in the list of hydrology indicators.<br />

9.Q. Must three transects always be evaluated for the methodology described to determine the<br />

prevalence index?<br />

A. No, in most cases, only 1 transect is required for purposes of these tests. <strong>The</strong> following<br />

guidance provides the exact circumstances under which options concerning the number of<br />

transects are permitted before proceeding to Step 11 and repeating the two transects: - If the<br />

prevalence index value determined for the first transect is less than 2.5 or more than 3.5, and, in<br />

the professional judgment of the investigators repeated transects are likely to provide the same<br />

result, the investigators need not repeat the transect. In cases where this shortened method is<br />

used, this should be reflected in the results. While the agencies recognize that this change in<br />

protocol does not strictly adhere to the method contained in the revised manual, it is nevertheless<br />

a practical step to reduce the demands of using the comprehensive method.<br />

10.Q. How are the frost-free dates determined under the proposed revisions which the field<br />

testing should utilize?<br />

A. <strong>The</strong> frost-free dates are to be determined by using the summary of growing season data<br />

developed by NOAA referred to on the first page of the Interagency Protocol. This information<br />

is available for each state and will be provided to the Divisions for distribution to the field in the<br />

near future.<br />

11.Q. Must sites visited and data collected prior to the recently released revised data sheets be<br />

redone using the new forms?<br />

A. No, both versions collect essentially the same data. Sections I (Background) and VI (<strong>Wetland</strong><br />

Evaluation) of the revised data sheets are identified as sections that will generally apply to the<br />

entire site, and in most cases will not have to be repeated for each individual transect. Besides<br />

25 February 1997 Environmental Techncal Services Co. 834 Castle Ridge Rd Austin, Texas 78746

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!