the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth - Greenpeace the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth A heAlth And environmentAl disAster “ Since Saturday 19 August 2006, Côte d’Ivoire is confronted by a humanitarian and environmental tragedy following the dumping of 523m 3 of toxic waste liquids from the Probo Koala. ” SAfIAtou BA-NdAw then Deputy Director of the Office of the Prime Minister of Côte d’Ivoire 182 Waking up to disaster On 20 August 2006, people living in and around Abidjan, particularly those living in the vicinity of the sites where the toxic waste had been dumped, noticed an extremely strong smell. Various individuals described the smell as “rot, gas and onion”, 183 “a stench that smells like motor oil or garlic or rotten petroleum residue,” 184 and “an unbearable stench”. 185 A doctor living in close proximity to a prison in the district of Yopougon, where some of the waste was dumped, stated that he and his family “had not yet gone to bed, when we were struck by a heavily sulfurous chemical smell.” 186 Victims of the toxic waste dumping around Abidjan wait to consult doctors at the main hospital of Cocody in Abidjan, 7 September 2006. © Greenpeace If the very strong smell caused concern, the accompanying physical symptoms triggered alarm. People living in different parts of Abidjan consistently described the smell as “suffocating”, and stated that their eyes, nose or skin began to sting. 187 One doctor described the stinging sensation as “if you had put your hand in chilli and rubbed your face”. 188 People exposed to the smell also consistently reported experiencing headaches, nausea, abdominal pains, diarrhoea and skin eruptions, amongst other symptoms. A doctor who had been out of the city at the time of the dumping but was recalled to help with the medical response told Amnesty International: “ on arriving in the city that day [29 August 2006] 189 I smelled an overpowering odour. I live in Riviera Palmeraie, an area located near one of the dumpsites. My immediate concern was for my children, which is why I went home first. when I arrived, I noticed that my children were suffering from ocular irritation, cough and thoracic pain. the odours were quite simply oppressive. they burned my throat and caused abdominal pain. My eyes itched, and I very quickly began to suffer the same symptoms as my family. ” dR A 190 51 Chapter 5
52 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpeAce netherlAnds Chapter 5 Rachel Gogoua, resident of Akouédo where large quantities of toxic waste was dumped. Photo taken during an Amnesty International research mission to Abidjan, February 2009. © amnesty InternatIonal Over the next few days and weeks, medical centres and hospitals were flooded with tens of thousands of people suffering from neurological, digestive, respiratory, ear, nose and throat (ENT), ophthalmological, cutaneous, and other health problems. 191 The National Institute for Public Hygiene recorded that 82 people were hospitalized because they were suffering from more severe symptoms linked to exposure to the waste. 192 The Ivorian authorities also recorded a number of deaths resulting from exposure to the waste. Official reports documented that between 15 and 17 deaths were caused by exposure to the toxic waste. 193 In the first few hours of 20 August 2006, the smell was so strong and all pervading that many people were frightened and distressed, triggering public panic. At this point people had no idea of the cause. As news of the nature of the waste emerged over the next few days, confusion and anxiety turned to anger, generating protests and violent demonstrations across the city. 194 Those who could left the city and many businesses and schools were shut down for days. 195 People who could not afford to leave their homes, though, had to continue to live and work close to the sites where the waste had been dumped. Lack of information about the composition of the waste and its potential effects also contributed to people’s anxiety and hampered the medical response. 196 There were also fears about contamination of food and water, since the initial analysis of the waste by the national authorities indicated that it contained organochlorines. 197 These are organic pollutants that can accumulate in the food chain and reach people through multiple pathways (such as drinking water and seafood), and may also be acutely toxic. 198 The government prohibited farming, fishing and small commercial activities in areas next to the contaminated sites. 199 The Ministry of Agriculture destroyed fruit and vegetable crops. It also ordered the destruction of livestock and fish, and the closure of slaughterhouses near the affected sites. 200 People’s access to their livelihoods and work was undermined by these government orders, and some people have claimed that they have only been partially compensated for the losses that they suffered. Local communities have also pointed out that, because of the financial pressures that small farmers and fishermen were under, or because of the lack of information, these orders were not fully implemented, which led to further concerns about people eating food from contaminated sites. 201 All of these concerns were exacerbated by delays in fully cleaning up the sites where dumping occurred. These issues are discussed in greater detail in this chapter.
- Page 1 and 2: the toxic truth About A compAny cAl
- Page 3 and 4: 2 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpe
- Page 5 and 6: 4 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpe
- Page 7 and 8: 6 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpe
- Page 9 and 10: 8 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpe
- Page 11 and 12: 10 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 13 and 14: 12 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 15 and 16: 14 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 17 and 18: 16 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 19 and 20: 18 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 21 and 22: 20 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 23 and 24: 22 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 25 and 26: 24 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 27 and 28: 26 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 29 and 30: 28 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 31 and 32: 30 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 33 and 34: 32 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 35 and 36: 34 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 37 and 38: 36 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 39 and 40: 38 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 41 and 42: 40 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 43 and 44: 42 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 45 and 46: 44 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 47 and 48: 46 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 49 and 50: 48 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 51: 50 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 55 and 56: 54 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 57 and 58: 56 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 59 and 60: 58 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 61 and 62: 60 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 63 and 64: 62 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 65 and 66: 64 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 67 and 68: gon d 66 Amnesty internAtionAl And
- Page 69 and 70: 68 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 71 and 72: 70 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 73 and 74: 72 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 75 and 76: 74 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 77 and 78: 76 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 79 and 80: 78 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 81 and 82: 80 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 83 and 84: 82 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 85 and 86: 84 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 87 and 88: 86 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 89 and 90: 88 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 91 and 92: 90 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 93 and 94: 92 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 95 and 96: 94 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 97 and 98: 96 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 99 and 100: 98 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenp
- Page 101 and 102: 100 Amnesty internAtionAl And green
<strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> <strong>truth</strong><br />
A heAlth And<br />
environmentAl<br />
disAster<br />
“ Since Saturday 19 August 2006, Côte<br />
d’Ivoire is confronted by a humanitarian and<br />
environmental tragedy following <strong>the</strong> dumping<br />
of 523m 3 of <strong>toxic</strong> waste liquids from <strong>the</strong><br />
Probo Koala. ”<br />
SAfIAtou BA-NdAw<br />
<strong>the</strong>n Deputy Director of <strong>the</strong> Office<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Prime Minister of Côte d’Ivoire 182<br />
Waking up to disaster<br />
On 20 August 2006, people living in and<br />
around Abidjan, particularly those living in <strong>the</strong><br />
vicinity of <strong>the</strong> sites where <strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> waste had<br />
been dumped, noticed an extremely strong<br />
smell. Various individuals described <strong>the</strong><br />
smell as “rot, gas and onion”, 183 “a stench<br />
that smells like motor oil or garlic or rotten<br />
petroleum residue,” 184 and “an unbearable<br />
stench”. 185 A doctor living in close proximity<br />
to a prison in <strong>the</strong> district of Yopougon, where<br />
some of <strong>the</strong> waste was dumped, stated that<br />
he and his family “had not yet gone to bed,<br />
when we were struck by a heavily sulfurous<br />
chemical smell.” 186<br />
Victims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> waste dumping around Abidjan wait to consult doctors at<br />
<strong>the</strong> main hospital of Cocody in Abidjan, 7 September 2006. © <strong>Greenpeace</strong><br />
If <strong>the</strong> very strong smell caused concern, <strong>the</strong><br />
accompanying physical symptoms triggered<br />
alarm. People living in different parts of<br />
Abidjan consistently described <strong>the</strong> smell as<br />
“suffocating”, and stated that <strong>the</strong>ir eyes,<br />
nose or skin began to sting. 187 One doctor<br />
described <strong>the</strong> stinging sensation as “if you<br />
had put your hand in chilli and rubbed your<br />
face”. 188 People exposed to <strong>the</strong> smell also<br />
consistently reported experiencing headaches,<br />
nausea, abdominal pains, diarrhoea and skin<br />
eruptions, amongst o<strong>the</strong>r symptoms.<br />
A doctor who had been out of <strong>the</strong> city at <strong>the</strong><br />
time of <strong>the</strong> dumping but was recalled to help<br />
with <strong>the</strong> medical response told Amnesty<br />
International:<br />
“ on arriving in <strong>the</strong> city that day [29 August<br />
2006] 189 I smelled an overpowering odour. I<br />
live in Riviera Palmeraie, an area located near<br />
one of <strong>the</strong> dumpsites. My immediate concern<br />
was for my children, which is why I went home<br />
first. when I arrived, I noticed that my children<br />
were suffering from ocular irritation, cough and<br />
thoracic pain. <strong>the</strong> odours were quite simply<br />
oppressive. <strong>the</strong>y burned my throat and caused<br />
abdominal pain. My eyes itched, and I very<br />
quickly began to suffer <strong>the</strong> same symptoms as<br />
my family. ”<br />
dR A 190<br />
51<br />
Chapter 5