the toxic truth - Greenpeace

the toxic truth - Greenpeace the toxic truth - Greenpeace

greenpeace.org
from greenpeace.org More from this publisher
01.06.2013 Views

the toxic truth The dumping in AbidjAn “ The day of Monday 21st August 2006 was long and difficult because of the persisting odours, which had caused me sudden eye irritation. Other colleagues complained of sore throats, which had appeared immediately after inhalation of the odours. We all carried on working because we were unaware of the danger and the nature of the odours. … Over the following week I also suffered from intense headache, a runny nose, dizziness and a sore throat. The workers at my company, as well as those from neighbouring companies, developed symptoms such as: eye irritation in the form of itching, stinging and red patches; bloating accompanied by flatulence; alternate diarrhoea and constipation; mouth sores like cuts in the cheeks and nosebleeds. ” Member of the workers’ union, Collectif des Travailleurs de Vridi 153 On 17 August 2006, two days before the arrival of the Probo Koala in Abidjan, Jorge Marrero, a senior executive at Trafigura, emailed Puma Energy, its Ivorian subsidiary, to inform it of the imminent arrival of the ship and that it needed to discharge 528m 3 of slops. 154 In that email Trafigura informed its subsidiary that, due to the chemical oxygen demand (COD) being greater than 2000mg/l, “these are not to be consider [sic] as ‘MARPOL slops, but ‘Chemical slops’.” 155 The email also Akouédo dump site, February 2009. People live and work close to the site. © Amnesty InternAtIonAl referred to the slops as “a mix of Gasoline, with caustic Soda and a high concentration of Mercaptan Sulphur”, and stated: “ Due to the high concentration of Mercaptan Sulphur the mix is very smelly and have to be removed from the vessel and disposed properly to avoid any environmental concerns or problems with authorities. ” 156 Puma received the email at 1.46pm local time. Shortly after that, a senior Puma company executive, N’zi Kablan, 157 telephoned a port agent called WAIBS (West African International Business Services) to request the telephone number of Ivorian Energy Technicians (ITE), 158 an established waste processing company in Abidjan. 159 However, within minutes, N’zi Kablan called WAIBS back and asked for contact details for another company. He reportedly explained that he could not reach the relevant people at ITE by telephone, as the ITE office was closed for the next half hour. 160 No explanation has ever been provided as to why the executive from Trafigura’s subsidiary company was unwilling to wait 30 minutes to speak with an established waste processing company with whom Trafigura had worked before. 161 WAIBS gave Puma the contact details of a newly licensed company – Compagnie Tommy – but it is unclear why they suggested this company. 162 45 Chapter 4

46 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpeAce netherlAnds Chapter 4 A meeting was then held on 18 August 2006 between the head of Compagnie Tommy, Salomon Ugborogbo, Kablan from Puma, and a WAIBS employee. 163 At the meeting Ugborogbo gave Kablan a contract in the form of a handwritten letter. As can be seen from the letter (reproduced above), the headed notepaper clearly showed that Compagnie Tommy had only received its licence the previous month, on 12 July 2006. The contract states that Compagnie Tommy will “discharge” the waste in a place called “Akouédo”. Akouédo is an open dumpsite for domestic waste, located in a residential district of Abidjan. It does not have facilities for storing or processing hazardous waste. Arguably, Puma, a local company, should have known what Akouédo dump was. In any case, it would have been very easy for either Puma or Trafigura to check this, and, as the owner of the waste, Trafigura had a responsibility to undertake appropriate due diligence with regard to the proper treatment and disposal of the waste. 164 The contract provided for the discharge of “MARPOL slops” at US$30 per m 3 and “Chemical Slops” at US$35 per m 3 . This contrasted sharply with the quote of €1,000 per m 3 quoted by APS to dispose of the waste in the Netherlands. On Saturday 19 August 2006, the Probo Koala arrived at the Port of Abidjan. Trucks and drivers hired by Compagnie Tommy were waiting to offload the waste, and work started the same afternoon. 165 During the offloading process at the Port of Abidjan, one of the customs officials who was present reported feeling ill due to the smell from the waste. In a later court case in Côte d’Ivoire, the customs official stated that the smell had been so unbearable that he and his colleagues had posted themselves upwind to avoid breathing it in, and that he had later sought medical treatment through his line manager. 166 Despite this, the customs officials took no further action to prevent the waste from being offloaded or to raise the alert about a potential problem with it. Customs officers accepted the explanation offered by Salomon Ugborogbo that the waste had been certified by a chemist as safe. 167 However, there is no evidence that a chemist ever looked at the material.

<strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> <strong>truth</strong><br />

The dumping<br />

in AbidjAn<br />

“ The day of Monday 21st August 2006 was<br />

long and difficult because of <strong>the</strong> persisting<br />

odours, which had caused me sudden eye<br />

irritation. O<strong>the</strong>r colleagues complained of<br />

sore throats, which had appeared immediately<br />

after inhalation of <strong>the</strong> odours. We all carried<br />

on working because we were unaware of <strong>the</strong><br />

danger and <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> odours. … Over<br />

<strong>the</strong> following week I also suffered from intense<br />

headache, a runny nose, dizziness and a sore<br />

throat. The workers at my company, as well as<br />

those from neighbouring companies, developed<br />

symptoms such as: eye irritation in <strong>the</strong> form<br />

of itching, stinging and red patches; bloating<br />

accompanied by flatulence; alternate diarrhoea<br />

and constipation; mouth sores like cuts in <strong>the</strong><br />

cheeks and nosebleeds. ”<br />

Member of <strong>the</strong> workers’ union,<br />

Collectif des Travailleurs de Vridi 153<br />

On 17 August 2006, two days before <strong>the</strong><br />

arrival of <strong>the</strong> Probo Koala in Abidjan, Jorge<br />

Marrero, a senior executive at Trafigura,<br />

emailed Puma Energy, its Ivorian subsidiary,<br />

to inform it of <strong>the</strong> imminent arrival of <strong>the</strong> ship<br />

and that it needed to discharge 528m 3 of<br />

slops. 154 In that email Trafigura informed its<br />

subsidiary that, due to <strong>the</strong> chemical oxygen<br />

demand (COD) being greater than 2000mg/l,<br />

“<strong>the</strong>se are not to be consider [sic] as ‘MARPOL<br />

slops, but ‘Chemical slops’.” 155 The email also<br />

Akouédo dump site, February 2009. People live and work close to <strong>the</strong> site.<br />

© Amnesty InternAtIonAl<br />

referred to <strong>the</strong> slops as “a mix of Gasoline,<br />

with caustic Soda and a high concentration of<br />

Mercaptan Sulphur”, and stated:<br />

“ Due to <strong>the</strong> high concentration of<br />

Mercaptan Sulphur <strong>the</strong> mix is very smelly<br />

and have to be removed from <strong>the</strong> vessel and<br />

disposed properly to avoid any environmental<br />

concerns or problems with authorities. ” 156<br />

Puma received <strong>the</strong> email at 1.46pm local time.<br />

Shortly after that, a senior Puma company<br />

executive, N’zi Kablan, 157 telephoned a port<br />

agent called WAIBS (West African International<br />

Business Services) to request <strong>the</strong> telephone<br />

number of Ivorian Energy Technicians (ITE), 158<br />

an established waste processing company in<br />

Abidjan. 159 However, within minutes, N’zi Kablan<br />

called WAIBS back and asked for contact<br />

details for ano<strong>the</strong>r company. He reportedly<br />

explained that he could not reach <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />

people at ITE by telephone, as <strong>the</strong> ITE office was<br />

closed for <strong>the</strong> next half hour. 160 No explanation<br />

has ever been provided as to why <strong>the</strong> executive<br />

from Trafigura’s subsidiary company was<br />

unwilling to wait 30 minutes to speak with an<br />

established waste processing company with<br />

whom Trafigura had worked before. 161 WAIBS<br />

gave Puma <strong>the</strong> contact details of a newly<br />

licensed company – Compagnie Tommy – but it<br />

is unclear why <strong>the</strong>y suggested this company. 162<br />

45<br />

Chapter 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!