the toxic truth - Greenpeace

the toxic truth - Greenpeace the toxic truth - Greenpeace

greenpeace.org
from greenpeace.org More from this publisher
01.06.2013 Views

the toxic truth By ratifying the Convention, states accept specific obligations, including: not allowing the export of waste to countries that have prohibited the import of such waste; 12 prohibiting trade in Basel wastes between Parties and non-Parties unless there is a special agreement; 13 prohibiting the export of waste without prior notification and consent from the state of import; 14 prohibiting the export of waste if there is reason to believe the waste cannot be managed in an environmentally sound manner. 15 An “environmentally sound manner” is defined as “taking all practicable steps to ensure that hazardous wastes or other wastes are managed in a manner which will protect human health and the environment.” 16 The Basel Convention identifies, in annexes to the Convention, certain categories of waste (hazardous and “other” waste) for which movement between states is restricted, and requires the prior informed consent of the recipient state. The Basel Convention makes illegal traffic in hazardous wastes or other wastes a criminal offence, and each state party is obliged to take “appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to implement and enforce the provisions of [the] Convention, including measures to prevent and punish conduct in contravention of the Convention.” 17 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL Convention) The Basel Convention applies to waste and hazardous waste but does not apply to the “wastes which derive from the normal operations of a ship”. 18 These wastes are covered by the 1973/78 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL Convention). 19 The purpose of the MARPOL Convention is to stop pollution of the marine environment by oil and other harmful substances. Harmful substances must be discharged to a “reception facility”. 20 Toxic waste and human rights Exposure to hazardous wastes can impact on a range of human rights including the rights to food, water, health and work. This can be due to direct contact with hazardous material or when soil, water, air, or the foodchain are contaminated. In some circumstances exposure to hazardous wastes can lead to a violation of the right to life. Under international human rights law, states have a duty to protect people from exposure to dangerous substances. It is imperative that states act to ensure that substances that are dangerous to human health, or which would contaminate food or water, are properly regulated and managed. In the absence of such action by a state, people would be unlikely to be able to take precautions as they may be unaware that they are in contact with waste or know what the properties of the waste are. In the 1980s and 1990s a specific dimension of the issue of dangerous waste material gained prominance: the role of private actors in shipping dangerous waste from developed to developing countries and dumping the waste without ensuring the safety of the environment or population. Several highprofile cases of dumping toxic waste in Africa prompted international condemnation and resulted in the creation of both the Basel and Bamako conventions. Recognizing the human rights dimensions in 1995, the then UN Commission on Human Rights (now Human Rights Council) appointed an independent expert (known as a Special Rapporteur) with a mandate to examine the issue. The mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the adverse effects of the movement and dumping of toxic and dangerous products and wastes on the enjoyment of human rights recognized that wastes generated in developed countries were often illegally dumped in developing countries. In 2011 the Human Rights Council expanded the scope of 17 kEy faCTS Of ThE CaSE

18 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpeAce netherlAnds kEy faCTS Of ThE CaSE the mandate to look at the whole life-cycle of hazardous products, from their manufacture to their final disposal. The right to health Article 12.1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) guarantees “the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health…”. 21 The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the Committee), the expert body that monitors the implementation of the Covenant, has clarified that the right to health, as defined in Article 12.1, “is an inclusive right extending not only to timely and appropriate health care but also to the underlying determinants of health, such as access to safe and potable water and adequate sanitation, an adequate supply of safe food, nutrition and housing, healthy occupational and environmental conditions, and access to health-related education and information.” 22 The Committee has also stated that the “right to treatment includes the creation of a system of urgent medical care in cases of accidents, epidemics and similar health hazards, and the provision of disaster relief and humanitarian assistance in emergency situations”. 23 The obligations of states parties to protect the right to health include requirements for “the prevention and reduction of the population’s exposure to harmful substances such as ... harmful chemicals or other detrimental environmental conditions that directly or indirectly impact upon human health.” 24 Violations of the obligation to protect the right to health follow from the failure of a state to take all necessary measures to safeguard people from infringements of the right to health by third parties. “This category includes such omissions as the failure to regulate the activities of individuals, groups or corporations so as to prevent them from violating the right to health of others; … and the failure to enact or enforce laws to prevent the pollution of water, air and soil by extractive and manufacturing industries.” 25 The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights also recognizes in Article 24 the right of all peoples to a “general satisfactory environment favourable to their development.” This right is more widely known as the right to a healthy environment. 26

18 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpeAce ne<strong>the</strong>rlAnds<br />

kEy faCTS Of ThE CaSE<br />

<strong>the</strong> mandate to look at <strong>the</strong> whole life-cycle of<br />

hazardous products, from <strong>the</strong>ir manufacture<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir final disposal.<br />

The right to health<br />

Article 12.1 of <strong>the</strong> International Covenant on<br />

Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)<br />

guarantees “<strong>the</strong> right of everyone to <strong>the</strong><br />

enjoyment of <strong>the</strong> highest attainable standard<br />

of physical and mental health…”. 21 The UN<br />

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural<br />

Rights (<strong>the</strong> Committee), <strong>the</strong> expert body that<br />

monitors <strong>the</strong> implementation of <strong>the</strong> Covenant,<br />

has clarified that <strong>the</strong> right to health, as<br />

defined in Article 12.1, “is an inclusive right<br />

extending not only to timely and appropriate<br />

health care but also to <strong>the</strong> underlying<br />

determinants of health, such as access<br />

to safe and potable water and adequate<br />

sanitation, an adequate supply of safe food,<br />

nutrition and housing, healthy occupational<br />

and environmental conditions, and access to<br />

health-related education and information.” 22<br />

The Committee has also stated that <strong>the</strong> “right<br />

to treatment includes <strong>the</strong> creation of a system<br />

of urgent medical care in cases of accidents,<br />

epidemics and similar health hazards, and <strong>the</strong><br />

provision of disaster relief and humanitarian<br />

assistance in emergency situations”. 23<br />

The obligations of states parties to protect <strong>the</strong><br />

right to health include requirements for “<strong>the</strong><br />

prevention and reduction of <strong>the</strong> population’s<br />

exposure to harmful substances such as<br />

... harmful chemicals or o<strong>the</strong>r detrimental<br />

environmental conditions that directly or<br />

indirectly impact upon human health.” 24<br />

Violations of <strong>the</strong> obligation to protect <strong>the</strong><br />

right to health follow from <strong>the</strong> failure of a<br />

state to take all necessary measures to<br />

safeguard people from infringements of <strong>the</strong><br />

right to health by third parties. “This category<br />

includes such omissions as <strong>the</strong> failure to<br />

regulate <strong>the</strong> activities of individuals, groups<br />

or corporations so as to prevent <strong>the</strong>m from<br />

violating <strong>the</strong> right to health of o<strong>the</strong>rs; … and<br />

<strong>the</strong> failure to enact or enforce laws to prevent<br />

<strong>the</strong> pollution of water, air and soil by extractive<br />

and manufacturing industries.” 25<br />

The African Charter on Human and Peoples’<br />

Rights also recognizes in Article 24 <strong>the</strong> right<br />

of all peoples to a “general satisfactory<br />

environment favourable to <strong>the</strong>ir development.”<br />

This right is more widely known as <strong>the</strong> right to<br />

a healthy environment. 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!