the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth - Greenpeace
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> <strong>truth</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> criminal acts that resulted in <strong>the</strong> human<br />
rights abuses committed in Côte d’Ivoire.<br />
Criminal charges were only ever brought<br />
against employees of <strong>the</strong> Trafigura Group in<br />
Côte d’Ivoire, but not against <strong>the</strong> corporate<br />
group. Gaps in Ivorian law meant that <strong>the</strong>re<br />
was no option to prosecute <strong>the</strong> company<br />
itself. Options to prosecute officials who acted<br />
in a decision-making capacity were also not<br />
properly exercised because of <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong><br />
settlement reached between <strong>the</strong> government<br />
and Trafigura and <strong>the</strong> departure of <strong>the</strong><br />
concerned individuals from <strong>the</strong> country. No o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
state has pursued prosecutions against any of<br />
<strong>the</strong> corporate entities involved in <strong>the</strong> criminal<br />
acts in Côte d’Ivoire.. This means that, up to<br />
now, <strong>the</strong> Trafigura Group, including <strong>the</strong> foreignbased<br />
Trafigura Beheer BV and Trafigura Ltd, are<br />
yet to be prosecuted for <strong>the</strong>ir involvement in <strong>the</strong><br />
illegal acts that unfolded in Côte d’Ivoire.<br />
The terms of <strong>the</strong> Ivorian settlement make<br />
it very unlikely (it not impossible) for any<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r prosecutions against members of <strong>the</strong><br />
Trafigura Group to be brought in <strong>the</strong> state of<br />
Côte d’Ivoire. This means that, should <strong>the</strong><br />
corporate members of <strong>the</strong> Trafigura Group ever<br />
be brought to account for <strong>the</strong> commission of<br />
crimes in Côte d’Ivoire, this must happen in<br />
one of <strong>the</strong> home states. In <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands,<br />
Trafigura Beheer BV was charged with<br />
committing domestic offences but not for <strong>the</strong><br />
full chain of events culminating in <strong>the</strong> dumping<br />
of <strong>the</strong> waste by its agent in Côte d’Ivoire and<br />
<strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> illegal transport and dumping<br />
of <strong>toxic</strong> waste on people in Abidjan. To <strong>the</strong><br />
contrary, <strong>the</strong> Public Prosecutor has refused to<br />
pursue charges against two corporate entities<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Trafigura Group for illegal acts committed<br />
in Côte d’Ivoire, and this decision has been<br />
upheld by <strong>the</strong> Dutch Court of Appeal. In <strong>the</strong><br />
United Kingdom, no prosecution has yet been<br />
brought against UK-based Trafigura Ltd, despite<br />
its executives making key decisions which led<br />
to <strong>the</strong> dumping of <strong>the</strong> waste in Côte d’Ivoire.<br />
These reflect failures by both states to<br />
fulfil <strong>the</strong>ir duty to protect and to properly<br />
investigate <strong>the</strong> role played by <strong>the</strong> corporate<br />
members of <strong>the</strong> Trafigura Group with respect<br />
to <strong>the</strong> acts committed in Côte d’Ivoire. Without<br />
coordinated action by states to investigate<br />
and hold multinational companies to account,<br />
impunity will prevail.<br />
In this case, three possible levels of<br />
accountability existed. Where domestic laws<br />
permit, corporate entities should be held<br />
accountable for causing or contributing to<br />
criminal acts. In addition (or in instances where<br />
it may not be possible to hold <strong>the</strong> corporate<br />
entity to account), individuals in decisionmaking<br />
positions or positions of control and<br />
influence should be held accountable for<br />
allowing <strong>the</strong> illegal acts to occur. Moreover,<br />
employees found to be directly involved in <strong>the</strong><br />
commission of illegal acts carried out during<br />
corporate operations should be legally held<br />
to account. Evidence exists which could have<br />
been used to tap into international channels<br />
to investigate <strong>the</strong> involvement of foreign-based<br />
actors in criminal activity relating to <strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong><br />
waste dumping.<br />
In Côte d’Ivoire, charges against <strong>the</strong> three<br />
Trafigura executives, Dauphin, Valentini<br />
and Kablan, were dropped, with <strong>the</strong> judge<br />
citing “insufficient evidence”. This occurred<br />
despite evidence existing that <strong>the</strong>re were<br />
viable grounds for pursuing <strong>the</strong> charges. The<br />
reality is that this was a result of <strong>the</strong> tradeoff<br />
reached between <strong>the</strong> Ivorian government<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Trafigura Group in light of <strong>the</strong><br />
Ivorian settlement reached one year earlier<br />
which, effectively, provided legal immunity<br />
to all Trafigura associated individuals and<br />
corporate entities. In <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, both<br />
Trafigura Ltd’s Naeem Ahmed and <strong>the</strong> Probo<br />
Koala’s Captain Chertov received suspended<br />
sentences and Ahmed was fined €25,000 by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Dutch court. Appeals related to <strong>the</strong> case<br />
are ongoing. In France, <strong>the</strong> public prosecutor<br />
decided not to pursue investigations into<br />
French nationals, Dauphin and Valentini,<br />
due to reasons including <strong>the</strong> prosecution in<br />
Côte d’Ivoire. This is despite <strong>the</strong> prosecution<br />
173<br />
Chapter 14