the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth - Greenpeace
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
152 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpeAce ne<strong>the</strong>rlAnds<br />
Chapter 12<br />
However, such anecdotal evidence is<br />
insufficient to draw conclusions, and clearly a<br />
robust system should have been put in place<br />
to monitor <strong>the</strong> affected population over time.<br />
“ Now after <strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> waste dumping we<br />
are even more worried that we are having to<br />
eat <strong>the</strong> contaminated foodstuffs. Despite<br />
<strong>the</strong> prohibition on cultivating, people are still<br />
growing produce (such as bananas) in <strong>the</strong><br />
affected areas and this stuff must end up in <strong>the</strong><br />
local market. We also drink <strong>the</strong> water but we are<br />
anxious about it. We don’t have any information<br />
about <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> waste on <strong>the</strong> water<br />
table. ”<br />
raChEl GoGoua<br />
President of <strong>the</strong> Association of <strong>the</strong> victims of Akouédo<br />
Extension 670<br />
The UN Special Rapporteur on Toxic Waste<br />
and Human Rights called on <strong>the</strong> government<br />
of Côte d’Ivoire, after his mission to <strong>the</strong><br />
country, to engage in a broad consultative<br />
process on <strong>the</strong> “outstanding issues and<br />
measures required to address possible<br />
long-term human health and environmental<br />
effects of <strong>the</strong> incident”; “conducting a health<br />
survey in affected areas and a mapping of<br />
outstanding health issues and providing<br />
adequate medical assistance to victims,<br />
including treatment of new and long-term<br />
manifestations of illnesses as a result of<br />
<strong>the</strong> dumping”; and “[e]nsure full access to<br />
information for those affected on measures<br />
taken to address possible long-term adverse<br />
effects on health and <strong>the</strong> environment of <strong>the</strong><br />
incident”. 671<br />
Victims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> waste dumping have a<br />
right to know whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> waste can<br />
have long-term impacts, and, if so, what <strong>the</strong>se<br />
are and how <strong>the</strong>y can receive treatment.<br />
Ongoing monitoring of <strong>the</strong> population<br />
would provide some reassurance. Amnesty<br />
International and <strong>Greenpeace</strong> have asked<br />
<strong>the</strong> government of Côte d’Ivoire why this was<br />
not done, using <strong>the</strong> compensation secured<br />
through <strong>the</strong> settlement with Trafigura, but at<br />
<strong>the</strong> time of writing, no response has been<br />
received.<br />
Trafigura has claimed that <strong>the</strong> waste could not<br />
have serious or long-term impacts. However,<br />
<strong>the</strong> company has refused to make public<br />
scientific data that it holds, so that this can be<br />
subject to independent scrutiny (this issue is<br />
discussed in greater detail in <strong>the</strong> Annex to this<br />
report ).