the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth - Greenpeace
the toxic truth - Greenpeace
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
116 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpeAce ne<strong>the</strong>rlAnds<br />
Chapter 9<br />
of foreseeable risks to <strong>the</strong> right to health in<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r state, and take action if <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong><br />
legal and technical capacity to do so. As <strong>the</strong><br />
previous sections of this chapter have shown,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Dutch authorities not only had sufficient<br />
information to indicate that <strong>the</strong> material being<br />
carried by <strong>the</strong> Probo Koala was hazardous<br />
and that exposure to <strong>the</strong> material could<br />
trigger negative health impacts, <strong>the</strong>y had legal<br />
obligations and <strong>the</strong> capacity to act to stop <strong>the</strong><br />
material leaving <strong>the</strong>ir territory in order to prevent<br />
harm to health of people outside <strong>the</strong>ir territory.<br />
Both <strong>the</strong> Basel and MARPOL conventions<br />
specifically deal with waste that is being moved<br />
across territorial jurisdictions by ship.<br />
The overriding concern that underpins<br />
MARPOL, <strong>the</strong> Basel Convention, and EU<br />
and Dutch law on both ships’ waste and<br />
movement of waste, is <strong>the</strong> prevention of harm<br />
to <strong>the</strong> environment and human health due to<br />
improper disposal of waste. Despite <strong>the</strong> lack<br />
of certainty about which laws applied, <strong>the</strong><br />
Dutch authorities acted in complete disregard<br />
of this objective. Regardless of any confusion,<br />
this core objective should have prompted<br />
more action.<br />
International and European law on waste<br />
control and management, including both<br />
Basel and MARPOL regimes, are premised on<br />
action by states o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> state where<br />
waste may ultimately be delivered. If sole<br />
responsibility for <strong>the</strong> harmful impacts of <strong>toxic</strong><br />
waste dumping are seen as resting only with<br />
<strong>the</strong> state where delivery occurs or where <strong>the</strong><br />
impacts are felt, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> central rationale for<br />
international law in this area would be eroded.<br />
The government of Côte d’Ivoire bears<br />
responsiblity for <strong>the</strong> violations of <strong>the</strong> right<br />
to health of <strong>the</strong> people of Côte d’Ivoire<br />
because of its failures to comply with its<br />
obligation to enforce laws to prevent <strong>the</strong><br />
import of hazardous waste into <strong>the</strong> country.<br />
However, as <strong>the</strong>se violations of <strong>the</strong> right to<br />
health resulted from <strong>the</strong> forseeable failure of<br />
one or more states to discharge <strong>the</strong>ir legal<br />
obligations under <strong>the</strong> Basel and MARPOL<br />
regimes to prevent <strong>the</strong> export and transit of<br />
hazardous waste, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r states also bear<br />
responsibility for <strong>the</strong>ir failure to comply with<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir international obligations in relation to<br />
Article 12 of <strong>the</strong> ICESCR. The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands,<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore, has breached its obligation under<br />
Article 12 of <strong>the</strong> ICESCR to protect <strong>the</strong> right to<br />
health in o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />
After <strong>the</strong> dumping, <strong>the</strong>re was intense public debate in <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, involving various officials and agencies. Officials and<br />
representatives from agencies involved in <strong>the</strong> decision-making in<br />
Amsterdam in July 2006 engaged in this public debate.<br />
toP LeFt: Lodewijk Asscher, assistant mayor for Port Affairs in<br />
Amsterdam and Marijke Vos, assistant mayor for Environment, Human<br />
Resources, Public Space and Green in Amsterdam. © ANP/eVert eLZiNGA<br />
bottom LeFt: Karla Peijs, minister of Transport. © ANP/SuZANNe VAN De KerK