the toxic truth - Greenpeace

the toxic truth - Greenpeace the toxic truth - Greenpeace

greenpeace.org
from greenpeace.org More from this publisher
01.06.2013 Views

the toxic truth Failure to prevent the dumping – responsibility oF Côte d’ivoire Côte d’Ivoire is a party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Basel Convention, the MARPOL Convention and the Bamako Convention. Under all of these treaties, the government is required to regulate traffic in, and arrangements for, handling or disposal of hazardous waste to ensure that it does not pose a threat to the rights to health, life and other human rights of communities who may be exposed to it. Côte d’Ivoire has in place a legal framework that reflects the provisions of international treaties on hazardous waste. The importation of wastes and hazardous wastes into Côte d’Ivoire is prohibited by Law No. 88-651 of 7 July 1988 (Article 1) and framework Law No. 96-766 of 3 October 1996 (Article 99 and 101). 436 Under these laws, the unauthorized importion of hazardous wastes and noxious substances is a criminal offence. In 2006 the government set up a National Commission of Enquiry to investigate the dumping of the toxic waste, and to identify those who may have been involved and their degree of responsibility. 437 The National Commission of Enquiry found that various authorities in Côte d’Ivoire had not properly August 2007: A man points at an area where toxic waste has been dumped in Abidjan. August 2007. © ANP/AFP/IssouF sANogo implemented or enforced Ivorian laws. Some of the main failures on the part of the Ivorian authorities, which enabled toxic waste to be illegally trafficked and dumped in Côte d’Ivoire, are detailed below. Failure to enforce licence requirements Compagnie Tommy’s flawed licence The National Commission of Enquiry found that Compagnie Tommy had been granted a licence as a “maritime chandler specialising in the emptying, maintenance and refuelling” of ships, but that this licence had been granted without following the required procedures and there had been errors in the ambit of the licence. 438 Compagnie Tommy’s licence as a maritime chandler (avitailleur maritime) was granted by the Ministry of Transport on 12 July 2006. A maritime chandler is described as “any subsidiary maritime transport body responsible for all provision of a ship’s supplies”. 439 The National Commission noted that, in addition to refuelling, a maritime chandler may also deliver motor oils and spare parts, which may require them to replace used oils and rotting pieces. 440 However this was a 99 Chapter 8

100 Amnesty internAtionAl And greenpeAce netherlAnds Chapter 8 separate category from operators who were authorized to remove “used waters and oils” from ships to “treat and ‘condition’ them”, for which a licence is granted “exclusively by the Environment Ministry”. 441 Under Law No. 96-766 dated 3 October 1996 concerning the Environmental Code, the Department for the Environment is the only body competent to issue licences for “garbage” (removal of garbage on board ships), for the recovery of waste, garbage, used oils, junk and other things on board ships. 442 The licence that Compagnie Tommy held was not, therefore, the one required for them to remove and treat waste from ships. The National Commission of Enquiry even found that the procedure for granting a licence as a maritime chandler had been incorrectly followed by the Ministry of Transport. 443 Under the law, 444 all such requests for licences should be referred to a Licence Commission, but Compagnie Tommy’s licence was issued without being either referred to or checked by the Licence Commission. 445 It was noted that the administration had not convened a single meeting of the Licence Commission since 2004. The licence was also processed without any investigation. The inspection of Compagnie Tommy’s place of business by the Head of the “Avitaillement” Office took place only after Tommy’s application had been sent to the Minister of Transport 446 for final approval, and, although the inspection revealed the inadequacy of Compagnie Tommy’s equipment, no action was then taken to withdraw or amend the licence. 447 The National Commission of Enquiry found that the Minister for Transport had approved the licence without a statement from the Licence Commission and he was aware that the Licence Commission had not met since 2004. 448 The Enquiry also noted that the terms used to identify the activities authorized under the licence were irregular and led to confusion about the scope of the licence. The Ministry had incorrectly used the terms “specialized in waste collection and maintenance” in the licence, and this had led to confusion between the activities permitted by a maritime chandler as compared with more specialist waste collection and treatment operations, which required licences from the Ministry of Environment. 449 Tommy granted additional permit by the Port Authority The catalogue of failings continued when, on 9 August 2006, just 10 days before the dumping, the Port Authority granted Compagnie Tommy “authorization for the recovery of used oils and domestic waste on board the ships docked at Port Abidjan”. 450 The National Commission of Enquiry found that this authorization exceeded the licence granted to Compagnie Tommy by the Ministry of Transport and included activities (recovery of waste and used oils) that were not permitted under the regulations governing maritime chandlers. 451 As noted above, licences to remove waste, including garbage on board ships and used oils, have to be granted by the Ministry of Environment, not the Ministry of Transport. 452 Despite having an obligation to ensure that Compagnie Tommy had the relevant qualifications and necessary equipment for the work, the Port Authority undertook no further investigation into the company’s application before granting the authorization. 453 The National Commission of Enquiry later found that it was this extension of the scope of Compagnie Tommy’s activity that permitted it to carry out the removal of waste from the Probo Koala, “something that a maritime chandler is not able to do”. 454 The Port Authority told Trafigura’s subsidiary, Puma Energy, that Compagnie Tommy’s papers were in order. 455 Customs officials fail to check Compagnie Tommy’s licence Compagnie Tommy then applied to the Customs Authority for permission to unload the waste. This application was also approved without enquiry. 456 The Director of the

<strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> <strong>truth</strong><br />

Failure to<br />

prevent <strong>the</strong><br />

dumping –<br />

responsibility<br />

oF Côte d’ivoire<br />

Côte d’Ivoire is a party to <strong>the</strong> International<br />

Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural<br />

Rights, International Covenant on Civil<br />

and Political Rights, <strong>the</strong> Basel Convention,<br />

<strong>the</strong> MARPOL Convention and <strong>the</strong> Bamako<br />

Convention. Under all of <strong>the</strong>se treaties, <strong>the</strong><br />

government is required to regulate traffic in,<br />

and arrangements for, handling or disposal of<br />

hazardous waste to ensure that it does not<br />

pose a threat to <strong>the</strong> rights to health, life and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r human rights of communities who may<br />

be exposed to it.<br />

Côte d’Ivoire has in place a legal framework<br />

that reflects <strong>the</strong> provisions of international<br />

treaties on hazardous waste. The importation<br />

of wastes and hazardous wastes into Côte<br />

d’Ivoire is prohibited by Law No. 88-651 of 7<br />

July 1988 (Article 1) and framework Law No.<br />

96-766 of 3 October 1996 (Article 99 and<br />

101). 436 Under <strong>the</strong>se laws, <strong>the</strong> unauthorized<br />

importion of hazardous wastes and noxious<br />

substances is a criminal offence.<br />

In 2006 <strong>the</strong> government set up a National<br />

Commission of Enquiry to investigate <strong>the</strong><br />

dumping of <strong>the</strong> <strong>toxic</strong> waste, and to identify<br />

those who may have been involved and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

degree of responsibility. 437 The National<br />

Commission of Enquiry found that various<br />

authorities in Côte d’Ivoire had not properly<br />

August 2007: A man points at an area where <strong>toxic</strong> waste has been<br />

dumped in Abidjan. August 2007. © ANP/AFP/IssouF sANogo<br />

implemented or enforced Ivorian laws. Some<br />

of <strong>the</strong> main failures on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> Ivorian<br />

authorities, which enabled <strong>toxic</strong> waste to be<br />

illegally trafficked and dumped in Côte d’Ivoire,<br />

are detailed below.<br />

Failure to enforce<br />

licence requirements<br />

Compagnie Tommy’s flawed licence<br />

The National Commission of Enquiry found<br />

that Compagnie Tommy had been granted a<br />

licence as a “maritime chandler specialising<br />

in <strong>the</strong> emptying, maintenance and refuelling”<br />

of ships, but that this licence had been<br />

granted without following <strong>the</strong> required<br />

procedures and <strong>the</strong>re had been errors in <strong>the</strong><br />

ambit of <strong>the</strong> licence. 438<br />

Compagnie Tommy’s licence as a maritime<br />

chandler (avitailleur maritime) was granted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Transport on 12 July<br />

2006. A maritime chandler is described as<br />

“any subsidiary maritime transport body<br />

responsible for all provision of a ship’s<br />

supplies”. 439 The National Commission noted<br />

that, in addition to refuelling, a maritime<br />

chandler may also deliver motor oils and spare<br />

parts, which may require <strong>the</strong>m to replace used<br />

oils and rotting pieces. 440 However this was a<br />

99<br />

Chapter 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!