01.06.2013 Views

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

a tripartite report - Unctad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />

conduct in contravention of this Act or to take actions<br />

to comply with this Act, and shall specify the<br />

time for compliance with the order and the duration<br />

of the order. The FCC may make an interim<br />

compliance order pending a proper consideration<br />

of a matter if the Commission is of the opinion that<br />

there is an imminent danger of substantial damage<br />

to a person if a threatened or likely offence<br />

is committed or there are other good reasons for<br />

making such an order 65 .<br />

Under Section 58(5), the FCC has the powers to<br />

<br />

a person has acquired shares or other assets in<br />

breach of section 11(1) on mergers, the Commission<br />

may make an order at anytime within three<br />

years after the acquisition: requiring the acquirer<br />

to dispose of some or all of the shares or assets<br />

<br />

the order; or declaring the acquisition to be void,<br />

requiring the acquirer to transfer some or all of the<br />

shares or assets back to the person from whom<br />

the acquirer acquired the shares or assets and requiring<br />

the vendor to refund to the acquirer some<br />

or all of the amounts received by the vendor in respect<br />

of the acquisition, as the Commission speci-<br />

<br />

FCC entered into one Compliance Agreement<br />

with East Africa Breweries Limited which in-<br />

<br />

This Compliance agreement involved a merger<br />

transaction between East African Breweries<br />

Limited (EABL) and Serengeti Breweries<br />

<br />

its shares within Tanzania Breweries Limited<br />

before it would consummate its merger. This<br />

condition took a longer time to be implemented<br />

thus led to FCC and EABL entering<br />

into an agreement whereby a time was speci-<br />

<br />

condition.<br />

<br />

has committed an offence against this Act (other<br />

than under Parts VI and VII dealing with implied<br />

conditions in consumer contracts and manufacturer’s<br />

obligations respectively), the Commission<br />

may order that person to publish, in such manner<br />

and within such time as the Commission sees<br />

<br />

appropriate relating to the offence. A compliance<br />

order is made in writing specifying the grounds for<br />

making the order. In Case 2 of 2009 66 , the Commission<br />

ruled thus:<br />

That pursuant to Section 58(1) and (3) Tanzanian<br />

Breweries is hereby ordered to immediately refrain<br />

from removing its competitor’s point of sale materials<br />

at the outlets and entering into anticompetitive<br />

branding agreements with outlet owners.<br />

Further, in Fair Competition Commission v. Bank of<br />

Africa, the Commission issued a compliance order<br />

to Bank of Africa for failure to notify a merger. The<br />

compliance order entailed the bank publishing a<br />

notice of compliance to the public (in a newspaper)<br />

a <strong>report</strong> expressing to the public how failure<br />

to notify their merger was inconsistent with the<br />

Act 67 .<br />

The Commission may enter into an agreement in<br />

writing, i.e. a “compliance agreement’, whereby<br />

a person undertakes to the Commission to refrain<br />

from conduct in contravention of this Act<br />

<br />

the compliance agreement or for the disposal of<br />

shares or assets and other matters, on such terms<br />

and conditions as the Commission deems appropriate.<br />

A compliance order shall be enforceable as<br />

an order of the High Court.<br />

2.5.2 Compensatory Orders<br />

Under Section 59, any person who suffers loss or<br />

damage as a result of an offence against this Act<br />

(other than under Parts VI or VII dealing with implied<br />

conditions in consumer contracts and manufacturer’s<br />

obligations respectively 68 ) may apply to<br />

the Commission for compensatory orders under<br />

this section against the person who committed the<br />

offence and any person involved in the offence,<br />

whether or not they have been convicted of the<br />

offence. Such application may be made at any<br />

time within three years after the loss or damage<br />

was suffered or the applicant became aware of the<br />

offence, whichever is the later 69 . This is in contrast<br />

to the substantive provision under Section 60(8) of<br />

the Act which gives the Commission the leeway to<br />

act upon an offence any time within six years after<br />

the commission of the offence.<br />

The law is silent about whether the Commission<br />

can at its own initiative, issue a compensatory order.<br />

For deterrent purposes and in the event that<br />

the case under review was commenced by the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!