a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
60 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />
conduct in contravention of this Act or to take actions<br />
to comply with this Act, and shall specify the<br />
time for compliance with the order and the duration<br />
of the order. The FCC may make an interim<br />
compliance order pending a proper consideration<br />
of a matter if the Commission is of the opinion that<br />
there is an imminent danger of substantial damage<br />
to a person if a threatened or likely offence<br />
is committed or there are other good reasons for<br />
making such an order 65 .<br />
Under Section 58(5), the FCC has the powers to<br />
<br />
a person has acquired shares or other assets in<br />
breach of section 11(1) on mergers, the Commission<br />
may make an order at anytime within three<br />
years after the acquisition: requiring the acquirer<br />
to dispose of some or all of the shares or assets<br />
<br />
the order; or declaring the acquisition to be void,<br />
requiring the acquirer to transfer some or all of the<br />
shares or assets back to the person from whom<br />
the acquirer acquired the shares or assets and requiring<br />
the vendor to refund to the acquirer some<br />
or all of the amounts received by the vendor in respect<br />
of the acquisition, as the Commission speci-<br />
<br />
FCC entered into one Compliance Agreement<br />
with East Africa Breweries Limited which in-<br />
<br />
This Compliance agreement involved a merger<br />
transaction between East African Breweries<br />
Limited (EABL) and Serengeti Breweries<br />
<br />
its shares within Tanzania Breweries Limited<br />
before it would consummate its merger. This<br />
condition took a longer time to be implemented<br />
thus led to FCC and EABL entering<br />
into an agreement whereby a time was speci-<br />
<br />
condition.<br />
<br />
has committed an offence against this Act (other<br />
than under Parts VI and VII dealing with implied<br />
conditions in consumer contracts and manufacturer’s<br />
obligations respectively), the Commission<br />
may order that person to publish, in such manner<br />
and within such time as the Commission sees<br />
<br />
appropriate relating to the offence. A compliance<br />
order is made in writing specifying the grounds for<br />
making the order. In Case 2 of 2009 66 , the Commission<br />
ruled thus:<br />
That pursuant to Section 58(1) and (3) Tanzanian<br />
Breweries is hereby ordered to immediately refrain<br />
from removing its competitor’s point of sale materials<br />
at the outlets and entering into anticompetitive<br />
branding agreements with outlet owners.<br />
Further, in Fair Competition Commission v. Bank of<br />
Africa, the Commission issued a compliance order<br />
to Bank of Africa for failure to notify a merger. The<br />
compliance order entailed the bank publishing a<br />
notice of compliance to the public (in a newspaper)<br />
a <strong>report</strong> expressing to the public how failure<br />
to notify their merger was inconsistent with the<br />
Act 67 .<br />
The Commission may enter into an agreement in<br />
writing, i.e. a “compliance agreement’, whereby<br />
a person undertakes to the Commission to refrain<br />
from conduct in contravention of this Act<br />
<br />
the compliance agreement or for the disposal of<br />
shares or assets and other matters, on such terms<br />
and conditions as the Commission deems appropriate.<br />
A compliance order shall be enforceable as<br />
an order of the High Court.<br />
2.5.2 Compensatory Orders<br />
Under Section 59, any person who suffers loss or<br />
damage as a result of an offence against this Act<br />
(other than under Parts VI or VII dealing with implied<br />
conditions in consumer contracts and manufacturer’s<br />
obligations respectively 68 ) may apply to<br />
the Commission for compensatory orders under<br />
this section against the person who committed the<br />
offence and any person involved in the offence,<br />
whether or not they have been convicted of the<br />
offence. Such application may be made at any<br />
time within three years after the loss or damage<br />
was suffered or the applicant became aware of the<br />
offence, whichever is the later 69 . This is in contrast<br />
to the substantive provision under Section 60(8) of<br />
the Act which gives the Commission the leeway to<br />
act upon an offence any time within six years after<br />
the commission of the offence.<br />
The law is silent about whether the Commission<br />
can at its own initiative, issue a compensatory order.<br />
For deterrent purposes and in the event that<br />
the case under review was commenced by the