a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
154 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />
Table 6: Restrictive Business Practices Closed by the Commission During the Period 2006-2010<br />
Commission Decision<br />
No. of Cases<br />
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006<br />
Case closed for lack of serious competition concerns 4 7 6 5 5 27<br />
Case closed on grounds of no breach of the<br />
Competition Act<br />
3 4 5 5 5 22<br />
Case closed for lack of competition concerns 2 1 1 0 2 6<br />
Imposition of cease-and-desist order 1 3 0 5 4 13<br />
Totals 10 15 12 15 16 68<br />
Source: ZCC and CCPC Annual Reports<br />
None of the competition cases involving restrictive<br />
business practices that were closed during the period<br />
2006-2010 were terminated through the im-<br />
<br />
ing<br />
and proving cartel activity. It is hoped that the<br />
introduction of a leniency programme in the new<br />
Act will expose such anticompetitive conduct and<br />
behaviour. It is also noted that most cases were<br />
No merger transaction was prohibited by the<br />
Commission during the period 2006-2010. Instead,<br />
the Commission unconditionally approved<br />
<br />
cent of the determined cases. The conditions that<br />
were imposed on the relatively few conditionally<br />
authorized mergers were of a behavioural<br />
nature. 170 All the conditions were accepted by the<br />
merging parties. The other cases were closed either<br />
for absence of merger transaction, i.e., lack of<br />
<br />
<br />
Total<br />
closed for lack of serious competition concerns, or<br />
for no breach of the country’s competition law, indicative<br />
of lack of adequate competition education<br />
in the country. The most effective remedial action<br />
taken by the Commission was the imposition of<br />
cease-and-desist orders.<br />
Table 7 shows the Commission’s determination of<br />
competition cases involving mergers and acquisitions<br />
during the period 2006-2010.<br />
Table 7: Determination of Mergers and Acquisitions by the Commission During the Period<br />
2006-2010<br />
Commission Determination<br />
No. of Cases<br />
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006<br />
Unconditional authorization 10 9 15 13 9 46<br />
Conditional authorization 1 2 1 3 10 17<br />
Case closed for absence/cancellation of merger transaction 5 5 1 2 8 21<br />
Totals 16 16 17 18 27 94<br />
Source: ZCC and CCPC Annual Reports<br />
Total<br />
Table 8 shows consumer cases involving unfair<br />
trading practices that were closed by the Commission<br />
during the period 2007-2010.<br />
Most unfair trading practices cases that were<br />
closed by the Commission during the period 2007-<br />
2010 (over 62 per cent of the cases) ended with<br />
refunds, or replacement of the defective products.<br />
A number of cases were also referred to other authorities<br />
for resolution, such as the Zambia Bureau<br />
of Standards and other relevant sector regulators,<br />
the Police, and institution of court proceedings.